http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : US Commercial Law (검색결과 3 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
김순석(Soon-Suk Kim) 한국기업법학회 2009 企業法硏究 Vol.23 No.4
Since the jurisdiction of US private laws belongs to each state, there basically exists no federal law with respect to private matters. Therefore the modernization and unification of commercial laws enacted by each state has become the major concern. The National Conference of Commissioners on Uniform State Laws and the American Law Institute, with the cooperation of the American Bar Association, enacted the Uniform Commercial Code(UCC) in 1952 and has revised it continuously thereafter. However, the UCC does not cover all corporate laws and its contents are only composed of some parts of Korean Civil Code and Commercial Code. Therefore, the Corporate Section of American Bar Association enacted the Model Business Corporation Act in 1950, which becomes the model law of state corporation laws. Regarding US insurance law, even though there is no model act, the New York Insurance Law and the California Insurance Law play major role in this field. As the jurisdiction of maritime law belongs to the federal government, several maritime laws are enacted as federal laws. This study analyzes US commercial laws in terms of general provision, corporation law, insurance law and maritime law by comparing Korean laws. It concludes that since the legal system of US commercial laws is quite different from that of Korean laws, it is not relevant to adopt US commercial law system to Korea.
-
이세인 한국상사법학회 2011 商事法硏究 Vol.30 No.1
The US law professors use various teaching methods for commercial law and corporations law classes. They tend to use traditional case-socratic method for first year courses and other basic courses. Problem method,seminar type of classes are used for upper-level classes. Legal Clinic is also an important way of providing practical experience to the students. Korean legal system can find its origin in the civil law system, where statutes and codes come before the cases, and the cases do not have binding force of law. Therefore using traditional case-socratic method as in the US for Korean law school subjects may not be appropriate. Instead, it will be helpful to use both statutes and cases in the class. Problem method seems to be a good way to provide Korean law school students opportunities to apply the learned legal principles to real-world situations. However it will require the professors’ as well as the students’ much time and preparation in order to make the class discussions meaningful. Practical seminar and academic seminar also seem to be good ways of teaching Korean law school students. Although the US legal education is mainly geared at raising legal practitioners, law schools also focus on producing legal scholars. In that regard, most US law schools have writing requirements for the students to graduate. It usually includes first year wiring requirement and upper-class writing requirement. Students generally satisfy the upper-class wiring requirement by submitting a 25∼50 page thesis paper through an academic seminar, or under supervision of a faculty member. Korean legal education is currently carried out in undergraduate and graduate law colleges and newly established law schools. It seems that graduate law colleges take academic approach to raise legal scholars, and law schools take practical approach to raise legal practitioners. Korean graduate law colleges may be able to find some ideas of training their students from the US law school’s academic approach focusing on writing requirements.
-
유인호 한국항공우주정책⋅법학회 2022 한국항공우주정책·법학회지 Vol.37 No.3
우주활동(space activity)의 중심이 국가에서 민간으로 재편되는 뉴스페이스(New Space) 시대에 있어서는 민간기업의 창의력과 혁신을 바탕으로 우주를 대상으로 하는 다양한 상품과 서비스가 민간과 정부에 공급될 수 있도록 하여 다양한 부가가치를 창출할 수 있는 시장중심의 분권형 우주활동의 모델이 대두되고 있다. 이 경우 다양한 형태의 민간기업의 수익모델을 국가안보에 부합되도록 시장을 형성하고 규제정책을 펼치기 위해서는 우주에 관한 조약들을 단순히 소개하는 것이 아니라, 규제정책의 방향과 형식, 규제기관의 권한배분과 예산정책 등을 종합적으로 이해하는 규제행정법적 방법론이 필요하다. 미국의 민간우주활동에 관한 규제 거버넌스를 살펴보면, 우주조약 등 국제우주법과는 큰 상관없이 미국의 국익을 우선하기 위한 방향으로 ⅰ) 연방헌법에 기초한 ⅱ) 의회의 제정법(statutes)과 예산승인(authorization), ⅲ) 대통령의 행정명령(executive order) 및 각종의 우주정책(policies)과 지침들(directives), ⅳ) 그에 따른 연방기관의 규정(regulations)과 규제권한(licensing)에 따라 이루어지는 것을 알 수 있다. 민간우주활동을 우주산업으로 장려하기 위하여 경제성과 효율성을 추구하되, 정부의 후견적 규제역할을 위하여 연방기관의 역할과 권한을 배분하였음을 알 수 있다. 대한민국 우주산업의 발전에 필요한 우주법학(宇宙法學)의 방향은 비교공법적 방법론으로 미국 연방우주법을 연구하고, 새롭게 조성되는 우주규제의 거버넌스에 있어 법경제학적 방법론(규제이론)에 입각하여 규제의 형성과 집행에 있어 이해관계를 적절하게 조율하는 절차주의적 방법론이 반영될 수 있도록 하는 것이어야 한다.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
