http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : Syntactic Structure of Resultatives (검색결과 5 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
The Causal Link Analysis of Resultatives
( Young Han Chung ) 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2010 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.49
To account for the syntactic and argument structures of resultatives, many analyses have been presented, including the binary SC (Small Clause) analysis, the ternary analysis, and the constructional approach. In the present study, the “causal link (CL) analysis” is proposed, which suggests that the cause part and the result part of a resultative are linked by the null causative verb CHANGE, which takes a resultative SC as its complement. CHANGE denotes either a change of state (CHANGES) or a change of location (CHANGEL). This new approach will reveal the different underlying syntactic and argument structures of various resultative constructions which appear to have the same structures.
-
Against Semantic Derivation of DOR Effects
Lee, Chang-Su 한국중앙영어영문학회 2006 영어영문학연구 Vol.48 No.4
As noted by Simpson (1983), a resultative predicate can only be predicated of the underlying object. Levin and Rappaport Hovav (1995) generalized it as the Direct Object Restriction (DOR). Recently, Wechsler (1997, 2001) argues that the DOR is factually incorrect by citing some counter-examples to the DOR, and that this phenomenon turns out to be purely semantic after all. Despite Wechsler’s (1997, 2001) claims to the contrary, this paper aims to show the validity of syntactic approach to the DOR effects. Particularly, this paper concentrates on showing that Wechsler’s (1997, 2001) counter-examples are correctly explained under the DOR without relying on his semantic constraints. Rather, this paper argues that the DOR effects can be captured by proposing a proper syntactic structure. This paper proposes that a resultative is formed by a verb’s taking of a resultative SC complement, which is composed of a resultative predicate and its semantic subject DP. This proposal is based on another proposal that, in a resultative, the postverbal DP is a derived object just like an ECM object, and it is derived by movement from the resultative SC complement to the Spec of VP.
-
Syntactic Structure of Resultatives
서수현 公州敎育大學 敎育硏究所 1997 公州敎大論叢 Vol.34 No.1
We purpose to make clear what position a resultative occupies at syntactic level. For this purpose, we have surveyed various properties of resultatives mentioned up to now. We have concluded that a resultative is an argument and not an adjunct. Assuming VP-shell structure, we propose to treat it the same with datives, particles, and so on. We support our proposal by explaining why re- like elements are not compatible with each other As a result, this proposal contribute to simplify the grammar by eliminating ACH.
-
Reassessing Syntactic Accounts of English Resultative Constructions
최문홍 한국영어학회 2011 영어학 Vol.11 No.1
Korean Journal of English Language and Linguistics 11-1, 151-191. This study reviews the previous syntactic analyses of English resultatives and proposes an alternative account. English resultatives are generally categorized into two varieties:transitive and intransitive ones. That the two are construed similarly has led many linguists to assume that they are uniformly represented in the syntax. However, this fails to reflect the fact that their argument structures differ significantly from each other. In the transitive resultative, the pair of the postverbal NP and the result predicate appears to be verb-internal. On the other hand,intransitive verbs do not extend it in their own right. For example,they forbid adverbs to take place when passivized and for the postverbal NP to shift to the sentence-final position. Drawing on a range of theoretical and empirical survey, I propose that the structural aspects of the transitive resultative may as well be illustrated by a configuration wherein the resultative small clause is base-generated at the specifier of the V with the causative v heading the VP, but those of the intransitive resultative by a small clause adjoining to the v which conveys an additional event caused by the matrix VP.
-
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
