PRODUCT INNOVATION AND PROFIT MODEL INNOVATION FOR MARKETING PERFORMANCE IN B2B

Jaesu Kim,Han-Sik Yu,Sin-Geun Song 글로벌지식마케팅경영학회 2018 Global Marketing Conference Vol.2018 No.07

Introduction This research was conducted in order to examine the influence of corporate innovation such as product innovation and profit model innovation towards sustainable competitive advantage and marketing performance. In B2B, the two biggest concerns of a manufacturing company are to provide products suitable for customer's business and to secure profitability of company business. Especially in an age when customer needs are diverse, companies need a lot of investment and effort to differentiate their products. Even though it is doubtful whether products that achieve such differentiation can achieve successful business results. Unless it is a monopoly, there are limitations in satisfying individualized and customized market trends and diverse customer needs with the technology and product competitiveness of companies alone. Therefore, corporate innovation requires a comprehensive approach in terms of product innovation and business model innovation. And product innovation and continuous profit model innovation for improving the company's profit is a very important factor. In order to achieve these two core values, the company conducts efficient operations internally to continuously develop products that meet customer needs and to conduct close customer relationship management to maintain a firm brand position in the market. Therefore, this study is designed to investigate how the innovation efforts of companies in B2B affect the sustainable competitive advantage development and market performance. Unlike previous researches on corporate innovation which included product innovation, this study included profit model innovation as corporate innovation to investigate the effects of profit model innovation on the actual marketing performance of firms. In addition, it is distinguished from the existing customer-oriented competitive advantage study (Porter, 1985) by studying the effects of sustainable competitive advantage on market performance by defining and applying sustainable competitive advantage variables from the perspective of internal marketing efforts. Theoretical Development Firms' needs and efforts for technological innovation and product innovation are very important for sustainable growth through securing economic benefits of firms (Hauser et al., 2006, Dave et al., 2013). In order to achieve competitive advantage (low cost, product differentiation), companies pursued technological innovation and product innovation through R & D investment. However, in terms of providing a total solution that satisfies the needs of various customers in the global competitive environment and improving the profitability of the company, it is difficult to explain the innovation area of the company only by technological innovation and product innovation. Therefore, in this study, it defines the corporate innovation including the business model innovation such as profit model from the perspective of the system operation to the innovation area of the company according to the claim that the business model mediates the firm and business performance (Markides, 2006; Baden -Fuller & Haefliger, 2013). And using sustainable competitive advantage in terms of product leadership, operational excellence, and customer intimacy, this study analyzes the effects of these firm innovations on the sustainable competitive advantage and business performance. Corporate innovation is broadly categorized into three categories: process innovation, product innovation, and operational management innovation (Lee et al., 2013). And the Oslo manual classifies them as product innovation, process innovation, marketing innovation, and organizational innovation (OECD, 2005). In the past, where product-centered markets and external competition were stable, changes in product technology made business models largely changeable, so corporate innovation could be described as technological innovation and product innovation. However, the development of advanced technologies such as information and communication technology (ICT) requires that the field of corporate innovation activities be analyzed from a new business model perspective. This is because existing product innovation, process innovation, marketing innovation, and organizational innovation are insufficient to explain the birth and change of new business types occurring in the same industry. In addition, we can find examples of business model innovation as a type of corporate innovation in existing studies (Christensen, 1997; Christensen and Raynor, 2003; Markides, 2006; Taylor et al., 2012). Therefore, this study reflects these changes and includes business model innovation such as profit model as a type of corporate innovation. In addition, Porter (1985)'s traditional competitive strategy (low cost, product differentiation) has limitations in evaluating the impact of corporate innovation and analyzing its relationship with business performance. In order to compensate for this, we introduce three main variables: product leadership, operational excellence, and customer intimacy, which can segment the value domain of sustainable competitive advantage and measure strategic performance capability, as a sustainable competitive advantage (Treacy and Wiersema, 1995). Research Design In previous researches, it has focused on technological innovation and product innovation to achieve the competitive advantage of product for better business performance in competitive market. However, these studies do not adequately suggest corporate innovation direction for corporate’s sustainable growth in complex and evolving business environment. Therefore, this study redefines the domain of corporate innovation and sustainable competitive advantage and then analyzes the effect of corporate innovation and sustainable competitive advantage on business performance. The hypothesis to be analyzed through the research model is as follows: H1. Product innovation has a positive impact on sustainable competitive advantage. H2. Profit model innovation in Business model has a positive impact on sustainable competitive advantage. H3. Sustainable competitive advantage has a positive impact on marketing performance. H4. Product innovation has a positive impact on marketing performance. H5. Profit model innovation in Business model has a positive impact on marketing performance. <Figure 1 research model> To analyze this hypothesis, it surveyed 300 machinery manufacturing companies producing intermediate goods in Korea through questionnaires with 5 point Likert scale. And the results were analyzed using SPSS (ver. 24.0) and AMOS (ver. 24.0). Result and Conclusion The findings show that profit model innovation of business model has a positive effect on the sustainable competitive advantage. However, product innovation has only a positive effect on product leadership of sustainable competitive advantage. And the sustainable competitive advantage has had a positive impact on market performance. Profit model innovation of business model also has an impact on market performance but product innovation has not a positive effect on market performance. It is meaningful that the company has confirmed the importance of the profit model innovation as well as the existing product innovation as the corporate innovation direction to pursue continuously. A practical implication of this study is that rapid technological advances, market changes, and globalization, as Bashir and Verma (2017) argue, should change profit model of a business model in order to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage in B2B of manufacturing industry. In order to maintain a sustainable competitive advantage, business model innovation with a clear profit model is highly needed as a new management strategy for the future. The theoretical implication of this study is that the existing studies on corporate innovation are focused on technology innovation, and the effect of product innovation on business performance is relatively small. In particular, empirical studies on the effect of business profit model innovation on marketing performance were not enough. Therefore, it can be said that the fact that product innovation and business profit model innovation have an influence on market performance expands empirical research.

지속가능한 주거단지 계획모형 개발

박원규 한국조경학회 2002 韓國造景學會誌 Vol.30 No.5

There have been endeavors for sustainable development all over the world after the Rio World Summit and the idea of sustainable development has become common paradigm. Now, Korea has come to a situation where we need to apply the concept of sustainable development inevitably. Especially housing estate development must be preliminary change for sustainable development. Therefore, the objectives of this study were to establish sustainable planning element system of housing estate, and to propose a sustainable planning model compatible with the Korean situation. The scope of this study focused on typical multi-family housing estates in Korea and the environmental sustainable planning model. The model was developed from the evaluation of the important level and extra costs of planning elements for sustainable development of housing estate. The important level of planning principles and elements was analyzed by conducting a survey to experts. As the results of this study, four planning section ('land use and transport', 'pollution and waste', 'energy', and 'natural resource') and twelve planning items were identified. Twenty-one planning principles and fifty-five planning elements were found. Synthetically, the sustainable planning element system is composed of four planning sections, twelve planning items, twenty-one planning principles, and fifty-five planning elements. Based on survey to experts, $\ulcorner$The short-term strategic model$\lrcorner$ was developed for the social implosion of sustainable development, which is composed of ten basic elements, eighteen necessary elements, twelve optional elements, and seven arbitrary elements. $\ulcorner$The long-term future model$\lrcorner$was developed for application to from 10 to 15 years later. It is composed of fifteen basic elements, thirty-three necessary elements, and seven optional elements. The planning model proposed by this study can be used as a prototype for the development of a sustainable housing estate and can provide a practical tool for developers and planners who are not familiar with the concept of sustainable development.

THE SUSTAINABLE BRAND EQUITY MODEL. A RETAIL STUDY MEASURING SUSTAINABLE BRAND EQUITY

Tony Apéria,Christian Persson 글로벌지식마케팅경영학회 2018 Global Marketing Conference Vol.2018 No.07

Introduction Aim Research in the Swedish retail sector 2017, shows that 37% of the public in Sweden has attitudes and behavior that make them part of the Lifestyle of Health and Sustainability group (Lohas). Lohas is a method (see Lohas.se) to measure sustainable living in a global context (Swedish Sustainability Ranking 2017). This make Sweden in the forefront. Furthermore, the Swedish government has issued a new law (entered into force in 2017) that demands Swedish companies with more than 250 employees or a certain turnover to annually report their sustainability efforts and how it connects to their business model. This is the background for our study investigating different industry sectors in Sweden. In this environment, retailers such as IKEA, Apoteket, Max Burger, Clas Ohlson, and H&M, followed by others, have gained recognition regarding their strong brands as well as good practice within sustainability. Sustainability has recently become more relevant to study. In Sweden repeated surveys, (2004-2017), have shown that Swedish retailers are perceived as the most reputable and sustainable of all companies. What is the background that makes retailers so trusted and sustainable among the general public and customers in Sweden? The purpose of this paper is to present and analyze the underlying factors which give retailers in Sweden such a high sustainability scores over time i.e. what factors are important to achieve sustainable brand equity in the Swedish retail sector. A detailed comparison will be made of two large surveys carried out in 2016 and 2017. Design/methodology/approach This paper explores the branding framework Customer-Based Brand Equity as well as Points of Difference (POD) and Points of Parity (POP) in a projective retailer sustainability perspective, Keller, Apéria and Georgson (2012). The overall customer brand equity framework is developed by Keller (1993). PODs is defined as unique associations, strong and favorable, linked to a brand. POPs are associations that can be shared with other brands, Keller, Sternthal, and Tybout (2002). Ailawadi and Keller (2004) discuss the importance of measuring retailer brand equity. According to the researchers brand equity has been one of the most challenging and important issues for both academics and managers. The chosen framework and the analysis for the study is the corporate brand level. A sustainability index, developed by Apéria, has been developed and tested during the period 2015-2017. The sustainability index measures four dimensions of sustainability: environment/climate, society/ethics, longterm/future perspective, and openness (see figure 1). The index is inspired by the Triple bottom line approach. The data comes from the Swedish Sustainability Ranking, the largest survey on sustainability in Sweden. More than 18,000 online surveys were carried out in 2016 and 25,000 surveys carried out in 2017. The panelists participating in the survey were recruited in order to be representative of the Swedish general public, age 18-74 years. 190 well-known and visible consumer companies were measured in 2016 and 200 companies and organizations in 2017. These companies were selected because they are well-known, salient and represent important categories from a consumer point of view. Our view of salience is based on Ehrenberg, Barnard and Scriven (1997). A pre-study was carried out in 2015 in order to understand consumer criterias for choice of retailer. In 2016, 32 retailers where measured in a specific retailer frame of reference. 4,225 surveys where carried out among general public who participated in the study. In the 2017 survey, 35 retailers were measured and 3,416 surveys were carried out, also in a retailer frame of reference targeting the general public. All respondents taking part in the study initially ranked companies with product, brand, and sustainability attributes. The respondents ranked these retailers with approximately 35 brand- attitude questions (Likert scale from 1-7). In the second part of the interview each respondent also indirectly, through a projective approach, described the retailer. The perspective of reputation and sustainability metrics has traditionally been used in a strict rational point of view. One example of reputation metrics is the RepTrak model described by Fombrun, Ponzi, and Newburry (2015), and van Riel (2012). Chun and Davies (2004) and J. Aaker (1997) have also discussed corporate character and brand personality from a rational point of view. Ailawadi and Keller (2004) have pointed out that brand personality as an area deserves greater attention from research. The authors of this article argue that a complementary perspective is needed to fully understand how consumers evaluate corporate brands and sustainability and the complexity behind this process. The authors propose to add emotional components in the evaluation, as a complement to the traditional rational view. The proposed way to understand the emotional side of a corporate brand is to use projective techniques (Apéria 2001, Apéria and Back 2004, Keller, Apéria and Georgson 2012). An advantage of projective techniques is that they may elicit responses that respondents may be unwilling or unable to give by traditional interview methods. In this retailer study we used projective techniques in order to explore the more emotional aspects of the retailers. Findings The results from the analyze presents Swedish retailers as representing the most sustainable of all company categories in Sweden. During a period between 2004-2017 the retail category have been in top positions of the Swedish reputation and sustainability ranking, measured in a longitudinal study. Apoteket, The Body Shop and Clas Ohlson have been ranked as number one, one time each. While IKEA has been number one eleven times during the period. During the last two years, 2016 and 2017 IKEA was ranked as number one, based on the sustainability index. The analyze has shown that the highly sustainable retailers operating in the Swedish market primarily are characterized by strong brands as well as strong perceptions of sustainability. An interesting example is the local Swedish fast-food company Max Burgers that strongly outperforms McDonald´s both as a brand as well on sustainability. Successful retailers have different personalities, and archetypes compared with other corporate categories. The analysis reveals that the strongest retailers with a high sustainability index are characterized by having strong brand personalities. Furthermore, the analysis also reveals that the archetypes characterizing these retailers are we-oriented archetypes such as: ordinary/familiar, stable/down to earth, but also the ego-oriented archetype focused/specialist. Examples of retailers with a strong brand personality are IKEA, The Body Shop, Stadium, ICA, Zara and H&M. When we compare the data from the study 2016 with 2017 we see the same results. Our results from both studies indicate that local retailers are more positively evaluated than international. We-orientated brands score higher than ego-orientated. Some retail categories are perceived better than others are. Examples of strong retail categories are pharmacies, furniture, food, and sport stores and weak retailer categories are hamburger restaurants, consumer electronics and telecom stores. However, there is always an opportunity for a retailer to be stronger than the category they represent. One example, earlier mentioned is the local hamburger chain Max Burgers that strongly outperforms international competitors such as Burger King and McDonald´s, when we compare their sustainability indexes. The results indicate that both rational and emotional factors constitute an important part of the Sustainable Brand Equity Model. This new model (see figure 2) has been developed and tested during surveys 2015-2017 by one of the authors as a part of the Swedish Sustainability Ranking. Central components of the model are sustainability indexes, corporate brand personality, brand associations meeting need segments which lead to brand loyalty and trust capital. Finally, our survey shows that retailers needs to be strong in both brand and sustainability. It´s not enough to only excel in sustainability. Research limitations/implications The Sustainability survey was carried out both in 2016 and 2017 in a retailer frame of reference including different retailers from different sectors. The authors recognize that Swedes rank retailers as the most reputable and sustainable category of companies every year. In different countries the general public has different opinions about which companies they found most reputable (Apéria, Simcic Brønn, and Schultz, 2004). Originality/value The authors compares the chosen 32 retailers studied in 2016 with 35 retailers studied in 2017 with the same method. In both surveys we used both rational questions and emotional projective questions in order to understand the retailers in-depth. In both surveys a sustainability index was used in order to rank the retailers.

ERIS모델 기반 창업지속요인 분석: 조직 리질리언스를 중심으로

김인숙,양지희 한국벤처창업학회 2021 벤처창업연구 Vol.16 No.5

This study is based on ERIS model for start-up performance, and aims to derive the main reason for start-up sustainability centered on organizational resilience. To this end, systematic literature examination and modified Delphi method were used to investigate start-up sustainability factors based on ERIS Model focused on organizational resilience. The results showed that ERIS model-based entrepreneurial continuity factors were divided into four categories: entrepreneur, resource, industrial environment, strategy, subdivision 8 and detailed factors 54. In addition, the ERIS model-based continuity factors were structured around organizational resilience, and the continuity factors were structured according to ERIS model under five categories: leadership, culture, people, system and environment. The results of this study are as follows. First of all, the results of existing research and analysis show that the concept of successful start-up and sustainability of start-up are used in various fields. Second, it is confirmed that there are common factors of influence on start-up performance and start-up sustainability based on ERIS model. Third, Delphi method's results showed that the general characteristics of entrepreneurs, such as academic background, education level, gender, age, and business experience did not affect the sustainability of entrepreneurship. This study is significant in that it is based on ERIS model focused on organization resilience, and ERIS-R, which integrates Strategy into System and Organization resilience into R in the field of gradually expanding start-up development and support. It is expected that the results of this study will improve the sustainability of start-up that can predict, prevent, and overcome various crises at any time. 본 연구의 목적은 창업성과모델인 ERIS모델과 조직 리질리언스를 중심으로 창업지속요인을 도출하는 것이다. 이를 위해 체계적 문헌고찰과 수정된 델파이 기법을 활용하여 조직 리질리언스를 중심으로 한 ERIS모델 기반 창업지속요인을 분석하였다. 분석결과, ERIS모델 기반 창업지속요인은 창업가, 자원, 산업환경, 전략의 4가지 분류와 하위구분 8개, 세부요인 54개로 분석되었으며 수정된 델파이 기법을 통해 창업지속요인의 적합도를 확인하였다. 또한, 조직 리질리언스를 중심으로 ERIS모델 기반 창업지속요인을 구조화한 결과, 리더십, 문화, 사람, 시스템, 환경의 5가지 분류 아래 ERIS모델에 기반하여 창업지속요인을 구조화하여 통합 프레임웍(ERIS-R)으로 제시하였다. 본 연구의 결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 기존 선행연구 분석결과, 다양한 분야의 선행연구에서 창업성공과 창업지속성의 개념이 혼용되어 사용되고 있었다. 둘째, ERIS모델을 기반으로 한 창업성과와 창업지속성에 주요하게 영향을 미치는 요인이 공통적으로 존재함을 확인하였다. 셋째, 조직 리질리언스를 중심으로 창업지속요인에 대한 수정된 델파이 분석 결과, 창업가 개인과 기업의 일반적 특징은 실제로 창업지속성에는 영향을 미치지 않는 것으로 확인되었다. 본 연구는 조직 리질리언스 개념을 중심으로 창업지속요인을 ERIS모델에 기반하여 분석했다는 것과 점차 확장되고 있는 창업 육성·지원 분야에서 ERIS모델에 전략(Strategy)을 시스템(System)으로 포괄하여 조직 리질리언스(Organization resilience)를 R로 연결한 통합 프레임웍(ERIS-R)을 제시했다는 점에서 그 의의가 있다. 본 연구결과를 통해 창업기업에서는 수시로 직면하는 다양한 위기상황에 대해 예측, 예방 및 극복할 수 있는 창업기업 지속성을 높일 수 있으며, 창업기업 지원 기관에서는 창업기업의 지속가능한 경영을 지원할 수 있는 육성 및 지원 정책 개발, 성과관리 등의 기초자료로 활용할 것으로 기대된다.

지속가능발전 연구에서 Three Pillar Model의 재검토

이시경 한국정책개발학회 2023 정책개발연구 Vol.23 No.1

As sustainable development research has centered on the environmental, economic, and social pillars, various Three Pillar Models have been proposed. The Three Pillar Model has been a useful tool for conceptualizing sustainable development and achieving its goals. Although the Three Pillar Model is a mainstream paradigm in sustainable development, there has been no systematic study on the form of the model or how it is organized. This article examines the contents of the Three Pillar Model and identifies research issues for the integration of the pillars and the development of the model. To improve the model, it was found that further research is needed on changing the content of the model according to the ideological position, organizing the basic pillars and indicators, exploring the nature of the relationship between the pillars, and reflecting the passage of time. The contribution of this study is to compare the contents of the Three Pillar Model, which was lacking in previous studies, and to suggest major research issues for integration between the axes. This article will also contribute to the construction of the Three Pillar Model with high validity and relevance in sustainable development research. 지속가능발전 연구가 환경, 경제, 사회 축을 중심으로 이루어지면서, 다양한 Three Pillar Model이 제시되었다. 지속가능발전의 개념화와 목표 달성을 위해 Three Pillar Model은 유용한 도구가 되어 왔다. Three Pillar Model은 지속가능발전 연구의 주류 패러다임이지만, 모형의 형태나 구성 방식에 관한 체계적인 연구는 이루어지지 않았다. 이 글에서는 주요 선행연구에서 제시한 Three Pillar Model의 구성 내용을 살펴보고, 축 간 통합과 모형의 발전을 위한 연구과제를 도출해 보았다. 모형의 보완을 위해 사상적 입장에 따른 모형의 내용변화, 기본 축과 지표의 구성, 축 간 관계의 특성 탐구, 시간 흐름의 반영에 관한 후속 연구가 필요함을 밝혔다. 이 연구의 기여는 선행연구에서 부족했던 Three Pillar Model의 내용을 비교하고 모형의 발전을 위한 주요 연구과제를 제시한 것이다. 또한 이 글은 다양한 분야의 지속가능발전 연구에서 타당성과 적실성이 높은 Three Pillar Model 구성에 이바지할 것이다.

비즈니스 모델 관점에서 인터넷 신생기업의 지속성에 관한 연구: Amazon.com 사례 중심으로

김장훈 ( Janghoon Kim ),김주태 ( Jootae Kim ) 아시아.유럽미래학회 2013 유라시아연구 Vol.10 No.1

It has been interesting issues that find out the source of competitive advantage to create abnormal rate of return in strategic management. In other words, strategic management has been finding way to create sustain competitive advantage as a source of above-average rate of return. This study is to search for the source of sustainability of internet newcomer. In accordance with business model perspective, it was recognized that the sustainability could be resulted from business model evolution of dot.com player. According to the result of case analysis, Amazon.com could successfully extend online bookstore, online retailer, web service, and marketplace model to business model convergence, in due order. Early stage, online bookstore model is to sell books to target customers at a low price via Amazon.com site. The model could build favorable brand image as a result of carrying on viral marketing and cost reduction, i.e. first-mover advantage. Next, online retailer model is to build best practice as a low price, high volume that basic commodities, or consumer goods are heavily sold at cheap price. This one tried to apply online bookstore success formula to other product items. Unlike the first two models, Amazon Web Service(AWS) Model intends to rent its own IT assets like servers to external customers - individual and corporate. AWS could expand cloud computing which is a kind of sharing service to take out a lease on servers to corporate clients. Whereas, Amazon Marketplace is a unique business model in that agency service are offered to build, operate and sustain e-marketplace system for corporate clients to build e-Commerce platform. This model was designed to share business activities like buying, payment, shipping or after-service with external customers. At last, e-book business looks like simply business model to sell Amazon Kindle to the target customer. On the contrary, the model represents business convergence in that it was to sell digital hardware and contents simultaneously. Furthermore, it could lead to create business ecosystem to attract several participants such as customer, publisher, writer, manufacturer, retailer, and telecom service provider. However, business forecast of the e-Book is lingering issue to wait and see expected outcomes in the near future. Until now, as a result of business model evolution, Amazon.com has been capable of delivering individualized customer experience to target audience, integrating its own core competence into newly business model. That is, success or failure of business model evolution depends on resource building mechanism how to exploit existing competence or explore new resources. After all, internet newcomer can have ability to sustain competitive advantage to create total customer experience to individual customers. The study is to provide practical implications for firms or managers of e-business industry in Korea. Future research are required to carry on empirical study or multiple case studies in order to generalize the above results.

Sustainable Infrastructure Assessment Model: An Application to Road Projects

Thanachon Krajangsri,Jakrapong Pongpeng 대한토목학회 2019 KSCE JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING Vol.23 No.3

Sustainable infrastructure assessment models play an important role in sustainable development. However, the current infrastructure assessment models for road projects have several limitations; specifically, all the models do not support the involvement of various stakeholders. Most models do not consider the risk arising from uncertainty in the assessment, and are not flexible regarding changes needed for local project contexts. Accordingly, this study aims to develop a sustainable infrastructure assessment model that overcomes these limitations, which is the distinct contribution of this study. A utility function is used to address the risk, and the stakeholders’ involvement is taken into account by a social welfare function. To provide flexibility for changes, the model is programmed using Visual Basic for Application for interactive activities with stakeholders (as assessors) and Microsoft Excel for calculation activities. The model includes four phases: 1) assessor weight selection, 2) assessment criteria and weight selection, 3) sustainable infrastructure assessment, and 4) sustainability assessment report. The model was verified and validated with four actual road projects, and acceptable results were obtained. Thus, the proposed model, which reflects reality more accurately than other available sustainable infrastructure assessment models, can assist stakeholders by reducing the time and effort required for assessing the sustainability of road projects.

Sustainable Fashion Design Module Development for Higher Education : Adaptation of ADDIE Instructional Model

( Hye-won Lim ),( Elizabeth Burton ) 한국패션비즈니스학회 2021 패션 비즈니스 Vol.25 No.6

Due to the fashion industry taking responsibility for their garment manufacturing, a significant number of UK universities are focusing on combining sustainability in their curriculum to support future employees’ skills and knowledge in sustainable fashion. A proper understanding of educational and instructional theories is needed to develop effective teaching and learning materials and environments. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the Fashion Design module created with consideration of sustainability using ADDIE instructional model. For evaluation, the teaching materials, including the module brief and the PowerPoint slides for each session, were used. Ten students were interviewed and observed along with two tutors, also interviewed to analyze the strengths and weaknesses of the module from a variety of viewpoints. With sustainable fashion being embedded into specialized higher education courses, tutors decided to incorporate sustainability into the module as an introduction to this topical subject in order to build a stronger foundation of knowledge and challenge traditional ways of working. Results showed that combining sustainability into the design and technical sessions had a positive influence on students who built upon their existing knowledge. Tutors researched the need for change within the industry in line with the Sustainable Development Goals and aligned the content to inform the students of the current crisis. This study could provide a guideline to create instructional material for sustainable fashion design courses.

Research and Development of Korea B(Benefit)-impact Model for Sustainable Development - in Case of Construction Sector -

권성식,이명식 대한건축학회 2019 Architectural research Vol.21 No.2

The purpose of this study is to research and development of ‘Korea B(Benefit)-impact Model’ for Sustainable Development. A concept evaluation model is ‘B(Benefit)-impact model’ in U.S.A. We use the results of surveys that examined the importance of social value issues to stakeholders in Korea to implement the benefit-impact model in Korea. In particular, in this paper, we use the KSI(Korean Sustainability Index) survey data conducted by the Korea Standards Association to evaluate the social value of the construction industry for representative stakeholders in the construction industry. The social value pool and the activity indicator pool used for the survey are created based on relevant International Standards; ISO 26000, ISO 14001, ISO 37001. As a result, Korea B-impact model for construction industry included the following five core social value issues; Strengthen transparency of corporate management, Ensure fair employment and employment relations, Efforts to prevent corruption, Conduct fair competition, Efforts to prevent environmental pollution. In addition, the US B-impact model has three limitations. First, it is unclear whether the key indicators have been derived while considering all issues of social value. Second, US B-impact model indicators are developed by the social responsibility experts, so it is necessary to review by stakeholders in each industry. Finally, it would be more effective for companies to use the B-impact model index as a more detailed activity indicator. When developing a Korea B-impact model, the following methods are used to supplement it. First, we reviewed all social value issues using international standards. Secondly, we used the KSI(Korean Sustainability index) survey results to derive the importance of the social value issue of construction industry in Korea. Finally, we have clearly matched the activity indicators by social value core issues based on the GRI Standard so that companies can actually use the Korea B-impact model for the construction sector.

지속가능한 비즈니스모델 설계 도구: 소셜벤처 사례를 중심으로

박재환,전혜진 한국벤처창업학회 2019 벤처창업연구 Vol.14 No.1

성공적인 비즈니스를 위해서 지속가능성과 관련된 도전과 기회들을 이해하는 것이 중요하다. 기존의 비즈니스모델 캔버스는 사회에 미치는 장기적인 영향과 관계없이 ‘성공’으로 식별되는 비즈니스 모델을 만들 수 있다. 하지만 지속가능한 비즈니스모델에 대한 원칙과 지침이 추가되지 않으면 새로운 한계에 직면할 수 있다. 본 연구의 목적은 경제적인 미션뿐만 아니라 사회적, 환경적 미션을 함께 수행해야하는 소셜벤처를 중심으로 지속가능한 비즈니스 모델 설계를 위한 도구들을 살펴보고 활용도를 모색하는데 있다. 이러한 연구 목적을 달성하기 위해 소셜벤처 창업가들의 경영사례를 분석하여 경제적, 환경적, 사회적 세 가지 관점의 비즈니스 모델을 정립하여 지속가능성을 높일 수 있는 기회를 탐색했다. 본 연구는 기존 선행연구의 한계점을 극복하고자 TLBMC (Triple Layered Business Model Canvas)를 사용하여 소셜벤처가 지녀야할 경제적, 환경적, 사회적 관점으로 다양하게 분석하였다. 그 결과 다음과 같은 시사점을 가지고 있다. 첫째, 경제적 요소를 사회적, 환경적 요구와 연결가능한 기회를 살펴보았다. 둘째, 소셜벤처의 특성인 환경적·사회적 관점을 실무에 활용 할 수 있음을 확인했다. 셋째, 소셜벤처 비즈니스 모델의 경험 자료를 구축했다. 본 연구는 질적연구의 특징인 참여자의 관점, 참여자의 의미, 참여자의 다양한 주관적 견해에 초점을 맞추어 진행하여, 도출된 전반적인 의미에 대해 연구자의 주장으로 결론이 마무리되는 사례연구로서의 한계를 가지고 있다. 그러나 본 연구의 새로운 접근법은 향후 지속가능한 성공을 위한 새로운 비즈니스 모델 설계의 기회를 제공하고 있다. 또한 실증연구를 위한 기초단계로서 소셜벤처 비즈니스 모델연구에 기초가 될 수 있을 것이다. 지속가능한 비즈니스의 기회를 이해하기 위해 향후 더 많은 사례연구와 개선된 도구에 대한 검증과 피드백에 관련된 연구가 계속 되어야 할 것이다. The purpose of this study is to seek ways of utilizing TLBMC by understanding business model of social ventures that are accompanied by social and environmental as well as economic missions. In order to achieve this, business models from economic, environmental and social perspectives will be analyzed, and we seek to enhance sustainability of social venture entrepreneurs. As the analysis tool, TLBMC(Triple Layered Business Model Canvas) expands upon the business model canvas that is widely utilized and recognizes economical terms. The TLBMC is proposed by Joyce, A., & Paquin, R. L.(2016) to help achieve a holistic view with horizontal and vertical associations. The study tries to overcome limitations of previous studies and observe a variety of economic, environmental, and social perspectives that social ventures should have with the TLBMC. As a result, it has the following implications; Firstly, creating separate social, environmental and economic business model canvas helps a business to have a holistic approach. Secondly, it was found that social venture characteristics of environmental and social perspectives were applied in practice. Lastly, we have established experience data on social venture business model. This study focuses on the opinions, the meanings and the subjective views of the participants. As a result, conclusions are drawn by the researchers ' assertions and has limitations as a research on case studies. However, this study will help people who are preparing or studying social ventures to have economic, environmental, and social perspectives. Also, redefinition of the direction and value of entrepreneurs operating social ventures, such as vision and mission, will help clarify the roles and responsibility of organizations. As a fundamental step for future empirical studies, this study could be the base for social venture business model studies.