http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : Ratification of the Conventions No. 87 and No. 98 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
이승욱 이화여자대학교 법학연구소 2019 法學論集 Vol.24 No.1
ILO 제87호 협약, 제98호 협약은 ILO의 기본협약으로서 우리나라가 수차례에 걸쳐 국제사회에 비준을 약속하였으나, 아직 비준하지 못한 상황이다. 이에 경제사회노동위원회 소속 의제별위원회인 노사관계제도・관행개선위원회에서는 제87호 협약및 제98호 협약 비준에 수반한 국내 법제도・관행을 위한 논의를 하였으나 노사정위원 사이에 합의를 보지 못하고, 결국 공익위원안이 제시되는 데 그쳤다. 그러나 공익위원안은 그간의 위원회 논의를 반영한 것이기 때문에 독자적인 의미가 있다고 평가할 수 있다. 이 논문은 추상적인 내용으로 되어 있는 공익위원안을 중심으로 하여 선택가능한 구체적인 입법방안을 제시하는 것을 목적으로 한다. 특히 이 논문은 유럽연합(EU)이 우리나라에 자유무역협정 위반을 이유로 공식적인 분쟁해결절차에 따라전문가패널 소집을 요구한 현 상황에서 국제노동기준과 EU와의 자유무역협정에 기한 노동기준을 감안하면서 현실적으로 실현가능한 입법방안을 모색하고 있다. Although over decades Korea has promised to ratify the International Labour Organization(‘ILO’)’s fundamental Conventions including Conventions No. 87 and No. 98, these Conventions are not ratified yet. Considering the urgent and persistent pressures from the international community, the ‘Committee for the Improvement of Laws, Measures, and Practices for Labor Relations Development’ was launched in ‘Economic, Social and Labor Council’, a presidential advisory body composed by tripartite members as well as public members, to make social dialogue and consultation between tripartite members in order to identify the obstacles to the ratification of the ILO Conventions No. 87 and No. 98 and to seek consensus for the amendment of labor relations law. However, as it failed to reach an agreement, the public members made their own recommendations for fulfillment of the mandate. Based on these recommendations, this article tries to suggest several concrete methods and ways in order to amend labor legislation which does not seem to comply fully to the above ILO fundamental Conventions. In doing so, this article considers broad context of international labor standards as well as the complaint made by the European Commission based on the Korea-European Union Free Trade Agreement.
-
이승욱 한국노동법학회 2019 노동법학 Vol.0 No.71
Among the fundamental Conventions in the International Labour Organization(‘ILO’), Korea has not yet ratified the Freedom of Association and Protection of the Right to Organise Convention, 1948 (No. 87) and the Right to Organise and Collective Bargaining Convention, 1949 (No. 98) in the field of the freedom of association. As the Korean Government appears to keep its promises for the ratification of these Conventions, the obstacles to the ratification needs to be identified in law as well as in practices in the light of international labour standards. For this purpose, firstly this article tries to focus on the implication of the ratification of fundamental Conventions to the Korean legislation and practices. After exploring the background of ‘core labour standards’ and the adoption of the ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work in 1998 which have played a significant role to clarify the international labour standards, this article identifies several legal and practical issues in Korean labour system presumably in conflict with the international labour standards. Lastly, it suggests several alternatives to resolves these conflicts and obstacles to the ratification of these fundamental conventions.
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
