RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        코퍼스 기반 중학교 영어 교과서 be 동사 부정 축약 분석

        강혜선 ( Kang Hye-sun ),김민경 ( Kim Minkyung ),신창원 ( Shin Changwon ) 글로벌영어교육학회(구 호남영어교육학회) 2019 Studies in English education Vol.24 No.1

        When be-verb negation is contracted, either verb contraction or negative contraction can be selected, based on the types of preceding subjects. Thus, a pronoun subject tends to be with verb contraction more frequently (e.g. She’s not/They’re not), while a full noun subject is more likely to occur with negative contraction (e.g. The classroom isn’t). In this regard, the current study aims to investigate if middle school English textbooks provide sufficient examples of English native speakers’ preference in using be-verb negative contraction. To this end, a small corpus was compiled, comprising all the listening materials from 14 middle school English textbooks. From this corpus, all the sentences including verb contraction and negative contraction each were extracted using a concordancer program to see what type of subject each contraction form occurs with more frequently. The results of this analysis showed that when the subject is a pronoun, verb contraction is favored over negative contraction, whereas negative contraction is more likely to be with a full noun phrase, suggesting that the English textbook present language input similar to English native speakers’ preference in using be-verb negative contraction.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼