http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : 필수 지명 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
사회과 지리 영역에서 지명교육의 현상과 필수지명의 선정
심정보 ( Jeong Bo Shim ) 한국지리환경교육학회 2007 한국지리환경교육학회지 Vol.15 No.2
본 연구는 사회과 지리 영역에서 지명교육의 현상과 문제점을 파악하고, 그 개선 방안을 모색하는데 목적이 있다. 중학교『사회』 교과서에는 1학년 지리 영역에서 가장 많은 지명이 취급되고 있다. 그러나 중학교 3학년을 대상으로 한국과 세계의 기초 지명에 대한 기억과 위치를 묻는 설문조사에서는 매우 낮은 결과가 나왔다. 이 사실은 국제화와 지구촌화 시대에 충격이 아닐 수 없다. 이러한 지리적 문맹을 근본적으로 해결하기 위한 과제의 하나로 국가 수준의 사회과 지리교육과정에「필수지명」을 선정해야 한다. 그것은 사회과 지리교육 및 생애학습 시대의 기초·기본이 되는 유용한 지식이기 때문이다. 본 연구에서는 그 기초 작업의 일환으로서 교과서 빈출 지명, 사회적 실용성, 지역적 균등성에 근거하여 한국과 세계의 지역상을 형성하기에 필요한 좌표축으로서 필수지명을 각각 사례로 제시했다. 이와 관련하여 더 다양한 논의와 연구가 필요하다. This study examines the current status and problems of geographical names education and seeks ways to improve geographical names education in middle school social studies geography field. In South Korea, most geographical names are taught in the first year of middle school. However, according to the result of a questionnaire survey which asked third year middle school students about fundamental geographical names in Korea and the world, the score turned out to be surprisingly low. In order to solve this problem of geographical illiteracy, it is necessary to select minimum essential geographical names in geography education because it is basic and useful to know minimum essential geographical names in geography field and in this age of globalization and life-long learning. This paper suggests an example of minimum essential geographical names, based on their frequency of appearance in textbooks, social use and regional balance. However, the issue of selection and determination of minimum essential geographical names requires more discussion and further research from various perspectives.
-
소송유지명령(訴訟留止命令) 및 집행금지명령에 대한 연구
이규호 ( Lee Gyooho ) 연세대학교 법학연구원 2020 法學硏究 Vol.30 No.3
On January 4, 2018, the Shenzhen Intermediate People’s Court (hereinafter “Chinese Court”) in China held a judgment in the Huawei v. Samsung standard essential patent (SEP) case. In this cease, the Chinese Court ruled in favor of Huawei, holding that Huawei had fulfilled its obligations under the fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (FRAND) provisions whereas Samsung did not. Hence, the Chinese Court issued an injunction against Samsung, banning any future infringement of Huawei’s SEPs from the distribution of Samsung’s Android devices. In response to the Chinese Court’s decision, Samsung moved for issuance of anti-enforcement injunction before the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, prohibiting Huawei from enforcing a couple of Chinese patent injunctions for the time being. Judge Orrick of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California issued an order that enjoins Huawei from enforcing an injunction on Chinese SEPs rendered by the Chinese Court. At the end, the world’s two largest makers of Android smartphones filed a joint motion to a U.S. appeals court on February 26, 2019 to halt court proceedings over their SEPs disputes because they have entered into a settlement agreement on February 25, 2019. This case shows the effectiveness of anti-enforcement injunction somehow foreign to legal community in civil law countries. Anti-enforcement injunction may be defined as a type of anti-suit injunction. In this regard, this Article aims in illustrating anti-enforcement injunction and anti-suit injunction. Courts in Western European countries are reluctant to issue anti-enforcement injunctions whereas courts in common law counties are more inclined to issue anti-enforcement injunctions. In this context, this Article explores how Korea, one of civil law countries, deals with anti-enforcement injunction. Also, this Article will delve into how Korea needs to touch upon anti-suit injunctions. Furthermore, this Article discusses ant-anti-suit injunction because a court of country A can issue anti-anti-suit injunction following issuance of anti-suit injunction made by a court of country B. In addition, anti-arbitration injunction and pro-arbitration injunction will de examined in that they needs to be scrutinized in cases where litigation is processed parallel with arbitration between same parties in terms of same claims.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
