RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        사비니(F. C. v. Savigny)와 역사법학

        이동희 ( Dong Hee Lee ) 단국대학교 법학연구소 2009 법학논총 Vol.33 No.1

        Historical jurisprudence came to prominence during the German debate between Anton Friedrich Justus Thibaut and F. C. v. Savigny over the proposed codification of German law. It emphasized the historical limitations of the law seeking to improving legal life through innovation of Jurisprudence. It stood in opposition to an earlier movement called rational Natural Law codifying non-historical and abstract speculation, and everlasting legal principal. Friedrich Carl von Savigny addressed historical study in the science of law based on the belief that the law originates with society evolved in an organic manner over time without interference from the authorities. He argued that law should be discovered in the judicial and social life as traditions, customs, language, practices and beliefs of the people. Historical jurisprudence, however, provoked criticism that it considered the source of law as the professional duty of lawyers to base their academic work on law on ascertaining the will of the people in the development of a legal system. The German Historical School has had considerable influence on the academic study of law in Germany continuing development of so called Pandektenwissenshaft and Begriffsjurisprudenz (conceptual jurisprudence) by Georg Friedrich Puchta and Bernhard Windscheid, and leading to the enactment of German Civil Law(1900).

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼