http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : 최고재판관 국민심사제 (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
정혜인 ( Hae In Jeong ) 서울대학교 법학연구소 2013 서울대학교 法學 Vol.54 No.3
The trial proceedings should be open to the public, and the opportunities for the public to positively and actively participate in such proceedings should be expanded Also, the establishment of principles of law interpretation (the grounds for justices’ judge and its preposition) should reflect civic societies` diverse values, and accordingly amended and changed In South Korea, compared with the legislative branch and the administrative branch, characterized by weaker democratic legitimacy, the judicial branch should be reinforced with such values Japanese Constitution provides the National Review for Judges of Supreme Court (Japanese Constitution Article 79 Sections 2, 3, and 4) Under this system, if, appointed by the cabinet, the judge of Supreme Court, may be put to direct national vote, they will be fired when the disapproval vote reaches a majority of the votes cast This system is designed to grant, by the principle of the sovereignty of the people, democratic legitimacy to the judicial agency This paper examines Japanese National Review for Judges of Supreme Court in which the people, through direct voting, participate in the composition of the Supreme Court, in a bid to find a new clue to reforming the composition of Korean Constitutional Court with vulnerable democratic legitimacy
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
