http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 주제어 : 非制度圈 文學 (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
申采浩 文學, 억압된 近代의 原史 -亡命 以後의 文學을 중심으로-
이정석 한국어문교육연구회 2010 어문연구(語文硏究) Vol.38 No.3
Sin Chae Ho’s works are characterized by strange and peculiar features of which origin cannot be found in modern literary history. However, it is necessary to activate plenty of possibilities within modern literature instead of criticizing it severely with certain criteria after the fact. As part of it, this article aims to consider ontological characteristics of Sin Chae Ho’s literature. Compared with institutional literature under Japanese Occupation when they had to accept some part of the political suppression forced by the ruling system, Sin Chae Ho’s literature is the product of considerably freed situation from political suppression. This acts as a decisive variable that determines the way of his literature’s existence. Looking into his criticism, you will find he established his own view of literature in the position to succeed to the traditional literary view of Muni-jedo(文以載道) progressively. Meanwhile, he constantly talks about the point of collapse and failure of historic reality. In other words, he provides a divine aura to the failure not to the winner and lets them experience the moment when the defeated and the suppressed feel desperate as present experience. From this, he intends to grope for the driving force of awakening and practice which enable the advent of a revolutionary event at the point of failure and collapse. In conclusion, the most important virtue which Sin Chae Ho’s narrative literature has is that it points to another path to modernism where Korean modern literature has never been. Perhaps, his literature contains a variety of possibilities so that we can even define it as the original history of Korean modern literature we have mistakenly neglected. 申采浩의 작품들은 近代文學史에서 그 유래를 찾아볼 수 없을 정도로 낯설고 기이한 모습을 하고 있다. 본고에서는 그 작업의 일환으로 申采浩 文學의 存在論的 特性을 고찰해 보는 자리를 마련해 보았다. 支配體制가 강요하는 일정한 政治的 抑壓을 수용해야만 했던 日帝 强占期의 制度圈 文學에 비한다면, 신채호의 문학은 정치적 압력에서 상당히 자유로운 상황의 산물인데, 이것은 신채호 문학의 존재방식을 좌우하는 결정적 변수로 작용한다. 한편, 그는 勝利者가 아닌 失敗者에게 神聖의 아우라를 부여하며, 패배한 자와 억눌린 자들이 패배하고 좌절한 바로 그 순간을 현재적 경험으로 체험케 하고, 그로부터 失敗와 破局의 地點에서 革命的 事件의 到來를 가능케 하는 覺醒과 實踐의 동력을 발굴해내려 하는 것이다. 申采浩의 敍事文學은 韓國 近代文學의 原史라 정의할 수 있을 정도로 다양한 가능성들을 내장하고 있다.
-
문학교육에서 바라본 일제강점의 기억과 체험 : 일제강점기 비제도권 문학교육의 양상 -독서,동인,동인지,멘토,문예강연,현상문예-
전봉관 ( Bong Gwon Jun ) 한국문학교육학회 2011 문학교육학 Vol.34 No.-
Modern literature was one of the newly emerging cultural forms, so it produced many youthful literary enthusiasts in the period of Japanese colonial rule of Korea. The fever of modern literature in that time was so hot that the society and educational institutes, which had to encourage the fever in ordinary time, however, had to cool it down. The fever of literature was so universal that it was useless to differentiate literary enthusiasts from ordinary students: almost all the students were absorbed in reading literary works and wrote them, not satisfied in passive reader, as to passing a night without sleeping. They organized literary coteries and published literary coterie magazines. Those activities was processed voluntarily by students which were eager to read and write literary works. It was true that literary education was imparted partially in formal education; in the course of Japanese, Korean, English etc. But most of literary education was imparted in fields of noninstitutional literary education such as reading, literary coteries, literary coterie magazines, mentors, public literary lectures, literary contests which were organized by newspapers and magazines etc. This thesis reconstituted diverse aspects of the noninstitutional literary education in the period of Japanese colonial rule of Korea through analyzing reminiscences on the days of learning literature of writers and poets in that time.
KCI
KISS연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
