http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
조용준 ( Cho Yong-joon ) 한말연구학회 2016 한말연구 Vol.- No.41
This review article provides a brief historical sketch of general linguistic trends of the articles which have been published in Hanmal-yeongu from 2005 to March in 2016. A total of 481 papers have been published during that period, and among them only 10 articles directly deals with the issues of general linguistics. We compared the journal with other 3 journals, which have similar characteristics. They include Hangeul (727 articles), Kwukehak (685 articels), Hankwukehak (861 articles) and Wulimal Yenkwu (425 articles). The results of analysis based upon comparison of the bibliographies in each articles shows that foreign and/or general linguistic theories have had less influence on Hanmal-yeongu than other three journals, and the authors of the journal have cited fewer foreign articles than the ones of the other journals. In addition, the results reveals that research methodology adopted by the authors looks simpler. In that respect, new direction for future research is proposed based on the presented inadequacies of the existing research papers in the view point of general linguistics.
한명숙 한말연구학회 2018 한말연구 Vol.- No.50
This study attempt to investigate the pronunciation aspects of the /ㄴ ㄹ/ sequence in the neologism. To do this, a neologism list of /ㄴ ㄹ/ sequence was made and the list was from 『new word』 resource book by the National Institute of Korean language from 2000 to 2017. Then, a questionnaire survey was conducted to college students by using a neologism list. In previous studies, regressive lateralization and the application mechanism of nasalization have been explained in several ways. There are various explanations such as phonological perspectives, the differences of speaker perception about morphological separation possibility, analogy, differences in language consciousness between generations, expansion of nasalization language consciousness. Among the various mechanisms, morphological separability and analogy are examined to find out whether the previous mechanism in morphological separability and analogy applies to new language as well or not. An analysis of the surveys reveals several important points. First, it was found that the preference of nasalization was generally high according to morphological separation possibility based on affix classification. It is true that perception of form boundaries has some influence on the preference of nasalization and lateralization pronunciation. However, it is impossible to check whether language speakers recognize and pronounce separation possibility or not. In addition, existing headwords and new words were compared to see if the mechanism of 'analogy' applies equally to new words. As a result, there were some new words which had same pronunciation with headwords, but there were other cases which were not consistent with standard pronunciation of existing headwords although they had the same morphological construction. In other words, it is true that the mechanism of 'analogy' are influential, but it does not apply to every new word. The pedagogical implication of the present research is that it is a specialized study which new word was an object of study for lateralization and nasalization compared with previous researches that existing words were only studied. Some limitation was that voice data was not dealt with in this study, thus further research will be needed.
19,20세기 초 국어의 풀이씨 이름씨 씨끝 -ㅁ,-기 연구
서은아 ( Eun A Seo ) 한말연구학회 2001 한말연구 Vol.- No.8
This study deals with the direction of change of nominalizers `-m` and `-ki` with respect to the preservation, the expansion, and the reduction in the scope of their realizations. The contents discussed here can be summarized as the following. First, in the 19th-century Korean, the scope of nominalization had been expanded in the case that a `-m`-adjoined clause functioned as a subject in a clause and that a `-ki`-adjoined clause functioned as an object. In the 20th-century Korean, the scope of `-m` had been expanded when its realization functioned as an object, and the one of `-ki` was expanded when its realization functioned as a subject. Secondly, `-m` was more frequently used than `-ki` when `-m` and `-ki` each maintained its scope. Thirdly, the mixed uses of `-m` and `-ki` in the same sentence were identical in the two periods. Particularly, the historical evidences of these mixed uses provide the explanation about the direction of change in `-m` and `-ki`.