http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 발행기관 : 원광대학교 법학연구소 (검색결과 2,086 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
-
문재완 원광대학교 법학연구소 2019 圓光法學 Vol.35 No.2
우리 법학교육은 전통적으로 일본과 독일의 영향을 많이 받았다. 1990년대 법학교육 개혁 이 사회적 관심사가 되면서 법학교육에서 미국의 영향력이 급속히 커졌다. 2009년 3월 미국 로스쿨을 모방한 법학전문대학원 제도를 도입할 즈음 미국 법학교육이 우리나라에 미친 영향 력은 최고에 달하였다. 이 글은 미국의 법학교육이 우리 법학교육에 미친 영향을 법학전문대 학원 도입 이전, 도입 즈음, 그리고 도입 10년 후인 현재로 구분하여 검토한 후 마지막으로 향후 전망을 논하고 있다. 미국식 로스쿨을 지향하는 법학전문대학원의 근간은 앞으로도 상당기간 유지될 것으로 전 망된다. 그동안 법학전문대학원을 운영하면서 적지 않은 문제가 드러났지만, 그렇다고 폐기해 야 할 정도로 현행 제도에 결함이 있는 것은 아니다. 과거 제도에 대한 향수를 가지고 있는 사람도 많지만, 법학전문대학원의 틀이 고착되어 과거로 회귀하기에는 너무 멀리 왔다. 법학전 문대학원 제도의 개선 논의는 앞으로도 계속 될 것이다. 주시해야 할 것은 예비시험제와 변호 사자격 취득 후 실무연수 강화방안이다. 두 가지 모두 법학전문대학원 제도의 근간을 흔드는 것이어서 실현될 가능성은 크지 않다. 법학교육이 변호사시험에 예속된 상황에서 미국 법학교육이 한국에 미치는 영향은 아주 제 한적이다. 새로운 법적 분쟁에 관한 미국 판례 및 학계 반응을 비교법적으로 검토하는 정도에 그칠 가능성이 크다. 교육방법 역시 당분간 지금의 틀을 그대로 유지할 것으로 전망된다. 변호사시험의 방법이 바뀌지 않는 한 교육방법은 바뀌기 어렵다. 미국 로스쿨의 법학교육방법중 소크라테스 방식이 우리나라에서 인기를 끌 가능성은 거의 없다. 리걸클리닉 교육에 대한 관심은 여전히 있겠지만, 변호사시험에 대한 부담감이 사라지지 않는 한 크게 활성화될 가능성은 없다. South Korean legal education was traditionally affected by those of Japan and Germany. As legal education reform became a social issue from the 1990s, the influence of U.S. legal education model has increased rapidly. The influence of the U.S. model reached its peak when the U.S.-influenced law school was instituted in March 2009. In this article, the influence of U.S. legal education model to Korean legal education system will be reviewed in three stages―before the adoption of U.S. legal education model, around the adoption, 10 years after the adoption―and the forecast of Korean legal education will be discussed. The foundation of the law school aiming for the American law school seems to be maintained for a long time. Not a few problems have come out during the operation of the law school, but it is not a big defect to shut down the current system. There are many people who have nostalgia for the past, but the law school framework has been stuck and it has been too far to return to the past. The discussion on improving the law school system will be continued. What should be considered important is a preliminary exam and a plan to strengthen the practical training after attaining a lawyer’s qualification. It is not likely to be realized because both of them will shake the basis of the law school system. The claim that the legal education of the law school should be liberated from the bar exam is strong, but it is not likely to happen. Because the traditional thinking of examining capability through the exam is dominating the Korean legal profession, the bar exam is likely to take the form of assessing legal knowledge in the future. In conclusion, the impact of U.S. legal education on Korea is very limited in the situation where legal education is subject to the bar exam. It is likely that the U.S. case and academic response to the new legal dispute will only be comparatively scrutinized. The education method is also expected to maintain the current framework for the time being. Unless the way of the bar exam changes, the education method is difficult to change. It is very unlikely that the Socratic method of American law school will become popular in Korea. Although there is still interest in legal clinic education, there is no possibility that it will be greatly activated unless the burden of the bar exam is gone.
-
-
胡亞球 圓光大學校 法學硏究所 2006 法學硏究 Vol.22 No.1
目前中國的大學本科法學育呈現出一派欣欣向宋的景象。然而在繁化背后, 一些敎育的基本理念門題却始終沒有得到充分的重視, 本科法學敎育的目標1) 問題就是其中之一。這一問題涉及法學院人才培養的規格、層次和類別,決定法學 院人才培養的方向,因而對這一問題的認識和解決是中國法學本科敎育問題的失 鍵。筆者擬以中國法學本科敎育國標的確立狀況爲中心,對其定位現狀等問題進 行分析,最終試固確立一介符合時代潮流的敎育目標。
-
-
-
-
-
박경철(Gyung-Chul Park) 원광대학교 법학연구소 2017 원광법학 Vol.33 No.4
This article deals with the scope and limit of a self-legislative power of national university in reference to the statute of national university, the man or woman, who can not serve as university president for a full four-year of the president’s mandatory term on reaching etirement age, is not eligible to run as a candidate for a university president(retirement age clause as ineligibility for a university president). A self-legislative power of national university is guaranteed by the freedom of academy(section 22 subsection 1 of Korea Constitution) and the autonomy of university(section 31 subsection 4 of Korea Constitution). Section 6 of korean Higher Education Act(kHEA) confers a legislative power about university administration on a president of national university. Section 6 of kHEA confirm the autonomy of university guaranteed by Korea Constitution. The autonomy of national university about university administration should be highly guaranteed to actualize freedom of academy. But a self-legislative power of national university is not an unlimited power. It should comply with the fundamental principles of he constitutionalism, like principle of statutory reservation, supremacy of law over administrative legislation, doctrine of parliamentary reservation, the principle of proportion, and principle of equality, etc. There is no regulation about the candidate’s age as ineligibility for a university president in kHEA and korean Educational Officials Act(kEOA). So retirement age clause as ineligibility for a university president has no legal basis. Therefore I believe, it violates the principle of statutory reservation. And it dose not correspond to the purpose of kEOA to expand the scope of candidate for university president. So I believe, it violates supremacy of law over administrative legislation. Besides retirement age clause as ineligibility for a university president causes the people, who can serve as a university president for 3 years and 11 months, is not eligible to run as a candidate for a university president. I believe, it violates the principle of proportion, which public power should obey, when public power tries to restrict human rights. And it pursue age discrimination, which can not be justified with regards to mordern aged society phenomenon and national policy to abolish the discrimination based on the age in employment, not only in public sector, but also private sector. So I think, retirement age clause as ineligibility for a university president shall be abolished
-
KCI연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
