http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
박효종 경상대학교 통일문제연구소 1990 民族統一論集 Vol.1990 No.6
This study attempts to present a viable approach toward reunification of Korea in terms of theoretical methodolgy. It defends the pluralist approach in contradistinctin to the existing politicist approach. The essence of the pluralist approach under concideratin is that step-by-step economic exchanges between citizens of two Koreas are superior to crucial political choices made by political authorities of two Korea. The pluralist approach assumes that economic self-interest is more important than political commitment and that unintended consequences resulting from economic and cultural exchange are more effective in bringing about reunification in the peninsula than purposive behavior and the construction of elaborate grand designs by political elites. Certainly, this study acknowledges that the process of pluralist exchange including economic and cultural exchange does not lead autonomatically to political unity. Political elites are expected to play a proper role in the initiation of reunification efforts. Nevertheless, political authorities of Seoul and Pyongyang should maintain a laisse-faire attitude toward economic exchange between citizens of two Koreas. This study views depoliticization and a technical treatment of the reunification issues as he most promising route to ultimate political reunification. Over time integration is to spill over from the economic to the political sphere as political loyalties follow economic interests and become attached to new reunification efforts. Moreover, this study assumes that in the absence of a statesman with the vision to weld disparate publics together, Seoul and Pyongyang have no alternative but to resort to gradualism, to indirection and to pluralism.
金容大 경상대학교 통일문제연구소 1990 民族統一論集 Vol.1990 No.6
쵸塗年, 中國追求改革·關放政策, 雖然有局部性的成果, 但是中騷一直在 「關個鑒持」下推行所謂 「中國式社會主義」, 導致卷政權的自相矛盾, 中國在 -九八九年五月圈0, 遣遇到鬪 「天安門事件」 所帶來新的深刻危機, 鉥如何挽徊己經離開的民心和己經破産的政權之合法性等.針對象些危機的狀況, 中國改草開放的緣H之演變, 關鐘仍在下述畿個課題:業-, 中國還要繼續定 「社會主義道路」, 由於高度組織的政經一體化公有制社會生産化和權力被少數人强制性周定化壟斷兩者交조影響下, 所帶來約 「官到」 與 「貪汚」 等各種弊病現況, 是否能諦蠶滿處理?其二, 中騷推行改革·開故以後提高T人民對政府携待的層次, 多元化的價値準則, 浦經濟與政治幣病重重,使人民對現況極爲不滿, 「三信危機」R益嚴重, 中國如何挽麗民心?其三, 在大陸人民的要求民主, 自由的呼聲, 己經養理, 조與黨的麥出地位必然犧觸, 中國堅持 「中國共産黨領導」原則, 對此能否容認?總之, 죠是一個彷徨中的政權, 基本上是由於中國過度重視中國的利益, 緣中國的利益超越在中國人的利益之上, 以致因難無窮.