RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        Administrative Claims Datasets in South Korea and Japan: A Comparative Assessment Based on Extensive Practical Experience

        Haine Lee,Younghyun Kang,Ji-Hyun Lee,Jae-Eun Myung,Liesl Strachan,Yoko Ishiguro,Sang-Soo Lee 한국보건의료기술평가학회 2020 보건의료기술평가 Vol.8 No.1

        The administrative claims datasets refer to the data that occurs when healthcare providers claim ser- vices and items of care rendered to patients from payers. The purpose of this study is to review and compare the characteristics and differences of the administrative claims data in South Korea and Ja- pan. We compared the differences of claims data and examined the utilization of the data based on the hands-on experience of analyzing the data in both countries. The structure of claims data of both countries are comparable since they originated from similar health insurance systems in general. However, there also exist some differences: 1) institution in charge of managing claims data, 2) data access, and 3) data component. First, while the claims data in South Korea are only constructed and operated by National Health Insurance Service and Health Insurance Review and Assessment Ser- vice, those in Japan are constructed not only Ministry of Health, Labor and Welfare but also local governments, academic societies or private entities. Second, in Japan, only government officials or academic societies members can have access to the claims data while other stakeholders can access data that are constructed by private entities but not nationally representative. However, private sector is allowed to access the claims data with public Institutional Review Boards in South Korea. Lastly, unlike Korea, the Diagnosis Procedure Combination database in Japan has a unique characteristic that contains important clinical outcomes and can be analyzed together with claims data. Generating robust research using real-world datasets such as claims, clinical and Electronic Medical Records data is emerging. Based on the review of this study, to enable researchers to perform extensive re- search projects, policies on the use and management of medical big data need to be developed and strengthened.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼