http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Joong Jin Toh 중앙법학회 2013 中央法學 Vol.15 No.3
Recently, the Organized Crime has a tendence in increasing and its method of crime is diverse and intelligent by means of lawful business and company, disguising the lawful, including unlawful method. Because of the circumstances above-mentioned, it needs to introduce restrictively the system of Undercover Employees as a means of investigation, to protect and repress effectively the organized crimes. The Undercover Investigations have some merits which can allow to know the whole things, only a member of organized crime can know, and which can protect and treat effectively the crimes and by means of collecting the all information about the crime in effectiveness of crime investigation. Though Undercover Investigation is an effective investigation method in investigating the organized crimes, there must be some worries of its abuses, because Undercover Investigation is executed by the Government and does not have any regulation and rule. Ordinarily, general investigation is open and has a characteristic of posterior measure. On the other hand, Undercover Investigation is disguised, fraud and used by the attraction method and has a characteristic of proactive and confidential measure. Because of the confidential method of Undercover Investigation, it is not easy to collect the information about Undercover Employees. So, it is compulsory that Undercover Employees should be run by the Court`s Admission or Warrant of Undercover Investigation, because there must be the violations of Human Rights. In some needs of protection of undercover employees, we can have some problems in Prosecution Process. It is not possible to take the undercover employees as a witness and it can crashed by the party`s interrogation of witness. And there can be more problems like qualification of evidence, crimes of Undercover Employees and so on. It should be prudent to introduce and adopt the Undercover Investigation or Undercover Employees, because there are some problems that the essence of Undercover Investigation can not divided crime world and non-crime world, and crime investigation`s superiority to ethics, destruction of citizen reliability. In some reasons above-mentioned, Undercover Employees should be introduced restrictedly by the consideration of benefits of investigation and guarantee of civil rights, benefits of governments by means of comparative weight.
도중진(TOH JOONG-JIN) 인하대학교 법학연구소 2016 法學硏究 Vol.19 No.2
아동이나 장애인 성폭력범죄 피해자의 경우 그들의 가장 취약한 문제인 의사소통과 가해자의 이름, 피해날짜 등 특정사항에 대한 기억력 등의 제약으로 형사사법절차에서 공소유지와 유무죄 판단에 어려움을 겪을 뿐만 아니라 이러한 이들의 특성으로 제2차 피해를 경험하기도 한다. 아무리 강력한 처벌과 다양한 제도라도 방어능력이 취약한 아동이나 장애인의 경우에는 여전히 수사 및 재판과정에서 그 보호가 충분하지 못하다는 지적이 계속될 수밖에 없다. 이러한 상황인식 아래 2013년 12월 19일부터 성폭력범죄 피해 아동 및 장애인의 진술조력인제도가 실시되었다. 진술조력인제도는 진술의 신빙성을 높여 실체적 진실발견에 기여하고, 피해자의 제2차 피해를 방지하며, 범죄의 실체를 파악하여 범죄자를 빠짐없이 처벌함으로써 정의를 실현하고 범죄의 예방효과를 촉진하여 사법정의 실현에 기여하는 제도이다. 그러나 진술조력인제도는 법률규정상 제2차 피해 방지보다는 원활한 조사에 초점을 두고 운영될 뿐만 아니라 그 적용대상 범죄피해자에 비해 진술조력인의 부족으로 그 실효성에 의문이 제기되고 있는 실정이다. 따라서 진술조력인제도가 효율적으로 운영되기 위하여는 진술조력인의 역할이 제2차 피해방지임을 명확히 조문화하고, 중립의무 위반에 대한 제재와 선정취소 등 제도를 정비할 필요가 있으며, 진술조력인의 적용범위를 확대하고 예산을 충분히 확보하여 진술조력인의 수요에 맞게 운영될 수 있도록 양성함으로써 제도의 부작용을 최소화하고 전문성을 강화하기 위한 최선의 노력을 경주할 필요가 있다. There could be not only problems of maintenance of prosecution but also problems of the Second Victim because child of sexual violence or the disabled of sexual is hard to remember the offender’s name, date of crime and some descriptions. Even though there could be stronger punishment and diverse system, the child or the disabled could not be protected enough in investigation and trial. Under circumstance-recognized, testimony aider for child of sexual violence and the disabled of sexual violence was carried out since Nov. 19 in 2013. Testimony Aider System could find of substantial truth by raising reliability and protect the Second Victim and contribute the criminal justice and do justice by punishing the criminal. Testimony Aider System can run for smooth investigation not for the Second Victim, but some questions could be raised because of lack of Testimony Aider to Victim. To run the Testimony Aider System efficiently some effective solutions could be needed. Testimony Aider’s role stipulates for protecting the Second Victim. Restrictions on neutral duty violation and selection cancellation also should be needed. The range of application should be widen and budget should be also necessary enough for need of Testimony Aider, by minimizing the disorder and strengthening the professionalism.