http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
R. C. Sihag,S. Kumar,S. K. Gahlawat 한국양봉학회 2004 韓國養蜂學會誌 Vol.19 No.2
The acute oral toxicity of ten insecticides to Apis mellifera and Apis dorsata by mass feeding method were determined and their safety indices were calculated. The honeybees were acclimated in the laboratory at 28±2℃. Different insecticidal concentrations were fed to the bees in 30 percent sugar solution. Endosulfan was the least toxic to A. mellifera (LD??=6.086 ㎍/bee) while deltamethrin was the most toxic insecticide (LD??=0.0264 ㎍/bee), and carbaryl, oxydemeton-methyl, monocrotophos, fenvalerate, malathion, dimethoate, phosphamidon, cypermethrin and deltamethrin were about 16.5, 18.6, 29, 32.5, 39, 50, 57, 169.5 and 230.5 times more toxic than endosulfan, respectively. Safety index values of acute oral tests suggested that endosulfan should be the safest and carbaryl should be the most toxic insecticide under field conditions. Apis dorsata was found to be more susceptible than A. mellifera and endosulfan was the safest insecticide for the former honeybee also in acute oral tests (LD??=3.903 ㎍/bee). If toxicity of endosulfan is taken as one, then carbaryl, oxydemeton-methyl, monocrotophos, fenvalerate, malathion, phosphamidon, dimethoate, cypermethrin and deltamethrin was 16.8, 18.5, 29.8, 42.7, 70.5, 130.5, 652.6 and 1364.6 times more toxic than endosulfan, respectively.
A New Model on Honeybee Repellencyfor their Safety against Pesticides
R. C. Sihag 한국양봉학회 2008 韓國養蜂學會誌 Vol.23 No.3
The previous honeybee repellency model is erroneous as it shows fifty percent repellency even for a non - repellent chemical. This has resulted into incorrect and ineffective recommendations. A new model has been presented after removing this error in the previous model.