Comparision of Penal Provisions on Sabotage for Radio Active Waste Facilities

Sangcheol Hyung 한국방사성폐기물학회 2021 한국방사성폐기물학회 학술논문요약집 Vol.2021 No.06

Radio Active Waste Storage Facility Located in Nuclear Power Plant and Physical Protection

Sangcheol Hyung 한국방사성폐기물학회 2021 한국방사성폐기물학회 학술논문요약집 Vol.2021 No.06

A Review on the DBT and Nuclear Damage Compensation Act

Sangcheol Hyung,Jaeyeong Jang 한국방사성폐기물학회 2022 한국방사성폐기물학회 학술논문요약집 Vol.20 No.2

It is still questionable if the Nuclear Damage Compensation Act can be applied to security accidents on nuclear facilities caused by hacking or drone attacks. If the Act is applied, the nuclear operator shall be liable for compensation for the damage even if there is no negligence, and no other person shall be liable. If it is not, victims must prove the negligence of nuclear operators and not only nuclear operators but also suppliers must be responsible. According to Article 5 of this Act, a nuclear operator cannot operate a reactor before signing liability insurance contract or a compensation contract or depositing in order to compensate for nuclear damage. The liability insurance contract includes the hacking accident, but it is not applied to drone attacks since only hacking accident is included in design basis accidents. However, Article 2 of this Act defines a nuclear accident as an event that may cause nuclear damage so it can be said that the ‘event’ includes intentional attacks. Article 3 stipulates that nuclear operators are not liable for compensation for damages caused by armed conflicts, hostile acts between countries, or civil war or rebellion. Therefore, if nuclear power plant is attacked by missiles from North Korea, the nuclear operator is not liable for compensation. And, it can be interpreted that the nuclear operator is liable for compensation for damages caused by actions of a third party that do not fall under this category. According to the Act on Indemnity Agreement For Nuclear Damage Compensation, nuclear damage caused during normal operation is included in the scope of compensation, but damage caused by actions of third parties is excluded. In the end, damage caused by actions of third parties is included in the scope of nuclear damage, but not included in the loss compensated by the government. According to the Act on Physical Protection, the Nuclear Safety & Security Commission is required to establish a design basis threat that is the standard for designing and evaluating physical protection systems. Therefore, it is reasonable to include the contents of design basis threats in liability insurance, or to apply the principle of no negligence liability and focus of responsibility to protect victims, if not.

Relationship Between Non-Compliance Notice and Corrective Order

Sangcheol Hyung,Min Baek 한국방사성폐기물학회 2023 한국방사성폐기물학회 학술논문요약집 Vol.21 No.2

Regulators conduct inspections and issue non-compliance notice, and it is necessary to examine whether this is equivalent a corrective order. A corrective order imposes binding obligations on a business, and violations of it can result in sanctions such as fines, license revocation, or suspension. Therefore, if it is a corrective order, it must go through procedures such as prior notification under the Administrative Procedure Act. However, so far, no such procedures have been followed when issuing non-compliance notice. There are three possible interpretations of it: 1) the issuance of a non-compliance notice is not a corrective order but a part of an inspection, 2) the issuance of a non-compliance notice is a corrective order but not a disposition, and 3) the process of hearing opinions and prior notification was carried out during the inspection. However, if it is a part of an inspection, it should be issued by KINAC or KINS, which is entrusted with the inspection, but it is issued by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission, and it is a disposition because it makes specific demands, and the corrective orders themselves have not gone through the procedure of hearing opinions. Therefore, in order for a non-compliance notice to be enforceable unlike a recommendation and to be issued by the Nuclear Safety and Security Commission instead of the inspection agency, the law should be amended and the procedure of prior notice and hearing opinions required by the Administrative Procedure Act should be carried out at the issuance stage.

Analysis and Design of a Wireless Power Transfer System With an Intermediate Coil for High Efficiency

SangCheol Moon,Bong-Chul Kim,Shin-Young Cho,Chi-Hyung Ahn,Gun-Woo Moon IEEE 2014 IEEE transactions on industrial electronics Vol.61 No.11

<P>This paper presents a theoretical analysis, an optimal design method, and experimental results for a wireless power transfer (WPT) system with an intermediate coil. The analytical expression of the dc voltage transfer function is presented and discussed. In a two-coil WPT system, which has low coupling coefficient, the intermediate coil boosts the apparent self-inductance and magnetizing inductance of the primary side at around the resonance frequency of the intermediate coil, so that the apparent coupling coefficient is compensated. The coupling coefficient makes the system efficiency increase and induces bifurcation phenomenon. From the analysis, this paper proposes an optimal design method using the second resonance frequency operation with the bifurcation phenomenon and presents design procedure for high efficiency. A prototype of the WPT system with the intermediate coil is implemented and experimented to verify the validity of the analysis and the proposed design method. The prototype operates at 100 kHz switching frequency and has an air gap between primary and secondary side of 200 mm. An overall system efficiency of 95.57% has been achieved at 6.6 kW of output power.</P>

Selective separation of solvent from deasphalted oil using CO₂ for heavy oil upgrading process based on solvent deasphalting

Im, Soo Ik,Shin, Sangcheol,Park, Jun Woo,Yoon, Hyung Jin,Go, Kang Seok,Nho, Nam Sun,Lee, Ki Bong Elsevier 2018 Chemical Engineering Journal Vol.331 No.-

<P><B>Abstract</B></P> <P>The solvent deasphalting (SDA) process is a heavy oil upgrading process in which deasphalted oil (DAO) is extracted from heavy oil feedstock by precipitating asphaltene using an excess amount of alkane solvent (C3-C6). After the extraction, solvent recovery should be carried out for separating the solvent from the DAO in order to recycle the expensive solvent. In the conventional solvent recovery method, the mixture of solvent and DAO is heated to evaporate the solvent, which requires massive heat energy, resulting in reduced process efficiency. In this study, CO<SUB>2</SUB> is applied for the first time to selectively separate solvent from DAO at a relatively low temperature. The experimental results in a batch separator indicate that the temperature required for high solvent recovery of over 80% decreases from 200°C to 40°C when using CO<SUB>2</SUB> compared to the conventional method. The theoretical approach using Hansen distance calculation based on the Hansen solubility parameter (HSP) was used to verify the mechanism of solvent separation using CO<SUB>2</SUB>. The results suggest that the increase in the interaction between CO<SUB>2</SUB> and solvent causes the separation of solvent from DAO, leading to an increase in solvent recovery. Also, numerical simulation results show the possibility of continuous operation for solvent recovery using CO<SUB>2</SUB>.</P> <P><B>Highlights</B></P> <P> <UL> <LI> Solvent recovery using CO<SUB>2</SUB> was newly developed for solvent deasphalting process. </LI> <LI> High solvent recovery was achieved at relatively low temperature. </LI> <LI> CO<SUB>2</SUB> acts as an anti-solvent to separate the solvent from DAO. </LI> <LI> Numerical simulation confirmed the possibility of a new solvent recovery operation. </LI> </UL> </P> <P><B>Graphical abstract</B></P> <P>[DISPLAY OMISSION]</P>