http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Félix Téllez-Ávila,Josué Barahona-Garrido,Sandra García-Osogobio,Gustavo López-Arce,Jesús Camacho-Escobedo,Angela Saúl,Salvador Herrera-Gómez,Javier Elizondo-Rivera,Rafael Barreto-Zúñiga 대한소화기내시경학회 2014 Clinical Endoscopy Vol.47 No.1
Background/Aims: No clear data have been established and validated regarding whether rectal retroflexion has an important and therapeutic impact. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact of rectal retroflexion compared with straight view examination. Methods: A prospective single-blind study was conducted. Consecutive patients evaluated between October 2011 and April 2012 were included. Results: A total of 934 patients (542 women [58%]) were included. The mean age was 57.4±14.8 years. Retroflexion was successful in 917 patients (98.2%). Distinct lesions in the anorectal area were detected in 32 patients (3.4%), of which 10 (1%) were identified only on retroflex view and 22 (2.4%) on both straight and retroflex views. Of the 32 identified lesions, 16 (50%) were polyps, nine (28.1%) were angiodysplasias, six (18.8%) were ulcers, and one (3.1%) was a flat lesion. All 10 patients (1%) in whom lesions were detected only by rectal retroflexion showed a therapeutic impact. Conclusions: Rectal retroflexion has minimal diagnostic yield and therapeutic impact. However, its low rate of major complications and the possibility of detecting lesions undetectable by straight viewing justify its use.