http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : S.P Willemsen (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
J.P.H. van Leur,T.S.C. Jakma,S.P Willemsen,B.J. Punt 대한고관절학회 2019 Hip and Pelvis Vol.31 No.1
Purpose: This study was performed to compare outcomes of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN) with a helical blade versus TFN with a femoral neck screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: A single center, retrospective cohort study. Patients (>18 years of age) with an intertrochanteric femoral fracture, who were operated on between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures were cut-out rate and intervention variables, respectively. Data from X-ray examinations and patient medical files were collected and analyzed. The chi-square test or Student’s t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 631 patients were surgically treated for an intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Of this group, 239 patients (37.9%) were treated with a TFN with helical blade and 392 patients (62.1%) with a TFN with femoral neck screw. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline characteristics of both groups. A total of 17 (2.7%) cut-outs were recorded, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.19). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcome measures between the two groups. Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes following treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with the TFN helical blade or TFN femoral neck screw. These findings suggest that the choice of collum implant for the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures cannot be made based on the surgical outcomes of the two implants evaluated here.
-
( J. P. H. Van Leur ),( T. S. C. Jakma ),( S. P Willemsen ),( B. J. Punt ) 대한고관절학회 2019 Hip and Pelvis Vol.31 No.1
Purpose: This study was performed to compare outcomes of the Trochanteric Fixation Nail (TFN <sup>®</sup>) with a helical blade versus TFN <sup>®</sup> with a femoral neck screw for the treatment of intertrochanteric femoral fractures. Materials and Methods: A single center, retrospective cohort study. Patients (>18 years of age) with an intertrochanteric femoral fracture, who were operated on between January 1, 2012 and December 31, 2016 were included. Primary and secondary outcome measures were cut-out rate and intervention variables, respectively. Data from X-ray examinations and patient medical files were collected and analyzed. The chi-square test or Student’s t-test were used for statistical analysis. Results: A total of 631 patients were surgically treated for an intertrochanteric femoral fracture. Of this group, 239 patients (37.9%) were treated with a TFN <sup>®</sup> with helical blade and 392 patients (62.1%) with a TFN <sup>®</sup> with femoral neck screw. There were no statistically significant differences between the baseline characteristics of both groups. A total of 17 (2.7%) cut-outs were recorded, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (P=0.19). Additionally, there were no statistically significant differences in the secondary outcome measures between the two groups. Conclusion: There are no statistically significant differences in primary and secondary outcomes following treatment of intertrochanteric femur fracture with the TFN <sup>®</sup> helical blade or TFN <sup>®</sup> femoral neck screw. These findings suggest that the choice of collum implant for the surgical treatment of intertrochanteric femur fractures cannot be made based on the surgical outcomes of the two implants evaluated here.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
