RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Machine Learning for Benchmarking Critical Care Outcomes

        Louis Atallah,Mohsen Nabian,Ludmila Brochini,Pamela J. Amelung 대한의료정보학회 2023 Healthcare Informatics Research Vol.29 No.4

        Objectives: Enhancing critical care efficacy involves evaluating and improving system functioning. Benchmarking, a retrospectivecomparison of results against standards, aids risk-adjusted assessment and helps healthcare providers identify areasfor improvement based on observed and predicted outcomes. The last two decades have seen the development of severalmodels using machine learning (ML) for clinical outcome prediction. ML is a field of artificial intelligence focused on creatingalgorithms that enable computers to learn from and make predictions or decisions based on data. This narrative reviewcenters on key discoveries and outcomes to aid clinicians and researchers in selecting the optimal methodology for criticalcare benchmarking using ML. Methods: We used PubMed to search the literature from 2003 to 2023 regarding predictivemodels utilizing ML for mortality (592 articles), length of stay (143 articles), or mechanical ventilation (195 articles). Wesupplemented the PubMed search with Google Scholar, making sure relevant articles were included. Given the narrative style,papers in the cohort were manually curated for a comprehensive reader perspective. Results: Our report presents comparativeresults for benchmarked outcomes and emphasizes advancements in feature types, preprocessing, model selection, andvalidation. It showcases instances where ML effectively tackled critical care outcome-prediction challenges, including nonlinearrelationships, class imbalances, missing data, and documentation variability, leading to enhanced results. Conclusions:Although ML has provided novel tools to improve the benchmarking of critical care outcomes, areas that require further researchinclude class imbalance, fairness, improved calibration, generalizability, and long-term validation of published models.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼