http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Olberg, Sven (검색결과 1 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Olberg, Sven,Green, Olga,Cai, Bin,Yang, Deshan,Rodriguez, Vivian,Zhang, Hao,Kim, Jin Sung,Parikh, Parag J.,Mutic, Sasa,Park, Justin C. BioMed Central 2018 Radiation oncology Vol.13 No.-
<P><B>Background</B></P><P>To simplify the adaptive treatment planning workflow while achieving the optimal tumor-dose coverage in pancreatic cancer patients undergoing daily adaptive magnetic resonance image guided radiation therapy (MR-IGRT).</P><P><B>Methods</B></P><P>In daily adaptive MR-IGRT, the plan objective function constructed during simulation is used for plan re-optimization throughout the course of treatment. In this study, we have constructed the initial objective functions using two methods for 16 pancreatic cancer patients treated with the ViewRay™ MR-IGRT system: 1) the conventional method that handles the stomach, duodenum, small bowel, and large bowel as separate organs at risk (OARs) and 2) the OAR grouping method. Using OAR grouping, a combined OAR structure that encompasses the portions of these four primary OARs within 3 cm of the planning target volume (PTV) is created. OAR grouping simulation plans were optimized such that the target coverage was comparable to the clinical simulation plan constructed in the conventional manner. In both cases, the initial objective function was then applied to each successive treatment fraction and the plan was re-optimized based on the patient’s daily anatomy. OAR grouping plans were compared to conventional plans at each fraction in terms of coverage of the PTV and the optimized PTV (PTV OPT), which is the result of the subtraction of overlapping OAR volumes with an additional margin from the PTV.</P><P><B>Results</B></P><P>Plan performance was enhanced across a majority of fractions using OAR grouping. The percentage of the volume of the PTV covered by 95% of the prescribed dose (D<SUB>95</SUB>) was improved by an average of 3.87 ± 4.29% while D<SUB>95</SUB> coverage of the PTV OPT increased by 3.98 ± 4.97%. Finally, D<SUB>100</SUB> coverage of the PTV demonstrated an average increase of 6.47 ± 7.16% and a maximum improvement of 20.19%.</P><P><B>Conclusions</B></P><P>In this study, our proposed OAR grouping plans generally outperformed conventional plans, especially when the conventional simulation plan favored or disregarded an OAR through the assignment of distinct weighting parameters relative to the other critical structures. OAR grouping simplifies the MR-IGRT adaptive treatment planning workflow at simulation while demonstrating improved coverage compared to delivered pancreatic cancer treatment plans in daily adaptive radiation therapy.</P>
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
