http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Mattee, A.Z,Mahonge, C.P.I,Nsenga, J.V,Nindi, S.,H. Kayeye 한국외국어대학교(글로벌캠퍼스) 아프리카연구소 2010 Asian Journal of African Studies Vol.28 No.-
The mountainous areas are made of multiple and diverse natural resources with multiple uses as well as intricate interactions of socio‐economic and ecological interests. These interests are constructed on and governed by institutions. Both the resource use patterns and institutions are dynamic spatially and temporally and these changes determine sustainability of natural resource systems. This research used a methodology combing quantitative and qualitative techniques to study institutional and resource use pattern shifts in Mvuha watershed situated in the East Uluguru Mountains and implications of these shifts on sustainable management of the watershed. The analysis shows that institutional and resource use patterns have changed simultaneously but with some spatial and temporal congruencies and tensions. While the main institutional shifts occurred from traditional management regime through formal state‐centred management regime to the current collaborative institutional framework, the resource use shift was translated in changes in vegetation cover mainly due to the following anthropogenic factors. However, at some temporal points, changes in the institutions could not result in anticipated changes in resource use patterns. The analysis has further uncovered that the failure of centralised governmental efforts to effectuate sustainable natural resources management has led to the re‐accommodation of local institutions in the management regimes. However, local institutions should not be viewed monolithically and simplistically because within the local field exist diverse local institutions wherein some support sustainable natural resources management while others constrain this virtue. It is concluded that, first, thorough understanding of the informal institutional framework is imperative before formal institutional arrangements are proposed. Second, sustainable natural resource management cannot be attained until alternative livelihood strategies for the local people to meet their basic needs are considered and integrated.
Mattee, A.Z.,Mahonge, C.P.I.,Nsenga, J.V.,Nindi S.,H. Kayeye 한국외국어대학교 아프리카연구소 2010 Asian Journal of African Studies Vol.28 No.-
The mountainous areas are made of multiple and diverse natural resources with multiple uses as well as intricate interactions of socio-economic and ecological interests. These interests are constructed on and governed by institutions. Both the resource use patterns and institutions are dynamic spatially and temporally and these changes determine sustainability of natural resource systems. This research used a methodology combing quantitative and qualitative techniques to study institutional and resource use pattern shifts in Mvuha watershed situated in the East Uluguru Mountains and implications of these shifts on sustainable management of the watershed. The analysis shows that institutional and resource use patterns have changed simultaneously but with some spatial and temporal congruencies and tensions. While the main institutional shifts occurred from traditional management regime through formal state-centred management regime to the current collaborative institutional framework, the resource use shift was translated in changes in vegetation cover mainly due to the following anthropogenic factors. However, at some temporal points, changes in the institutions could not result in anticipated changes in resource use patterns. The analysis has further uncovered that the failure of centralised governmental efforts to effectuate sustainable natural resources management has led to the re-accommodation of local institutions in the management regimes. However, local institutions should not be viewed monolithically and simplistically because within the local field exist diverse local institutions wherein some support sustainable natural resources management while others constrain this virtue. It is concluded that, first, thorough understanding of the informal institutional framework is imperative before formal institutional arrangements are proposed. Second, sustainable natural resource management cannot be attained until alternative livelihood strategies for the local people to meet their basic needs are considered and integrated.