http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Comparison of three skin-stretching devices for closing skin defects on the limbs of dogs
Vassiliki Tsioli,Lysimachos G. Papazoglou,Nikolaos Papaioannou,Dimitra Psalla,Ioannis Savvas,Leonidas Pavlidis,Maria Karayannopoulpou 대한수의학회 2015 Journal of Veterinary Science Vol.16 No.1
Our objective was to evaluate the effectiveness of skin-stretching devices for closing defects on the extremities of dogs. Antebrachial skindefects were created on the limbs of 24 dogs randomly divided into three groups. Skin stretchers included staples and sutures passing throughthem (group A), sutures and hypodermic needles (group B), and Pavletic device (group C). Wounds on the left were further undermined inall groups. Tension and blood perfusion were assessed. After removing the stretchers on day 3, the defects were sutured and wound healingwas clinically scored. Histological variables evaluated were cellular infiltration, edema, collagen orientation, and thickness of epidermis. Significant differences in tension were found among groups (p < 0.0005) and between measurement times for undermined (p = 0.001) ornon-undermined (p < 0.0005) wounds. In contrast, blood perfusion values did not differ significantly. Clinical scores for group B seemedto be better than those for groups A and C, but differences were not significant. Primary wound closure using the Pavletic device was notfeasible. Νo significant differences in histological variables were found between groups. Skin stretching with staples or hypodermic needlesresulted in successful wound management with minor side effects on skin histology and circulation.