RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Grammatical Judgment of Korean Short-form Negation as Prefix

        Hohyeuk Won,Hyoungyoub Kim 한국중원언어학회 2018 언어학연구 Vol.0 No.48

        This study aims to do a research for the judgement of the grammaticality of the short-form negation sentences through SNGM following hierarchical constrains within the theoretical framework of Optimality approach. Unlike long-form negation, the expressions including short-form negations that could act as prefixes show the patterns of distributional limitations with derivatives, compound words, long-syllable words, Sino-Korean words, and idiomatic expressions. However, in these days, some people show that they seem to feel comfortable though they even add short-form negations with those limited expressions; moreover, the previous studies could not find how to explain this phenomenon. Following the survey, we statistically discover the fact that as the predicate forms include more and more limitations, they hardly allow the attachment of short-form negation, and the number of accepted cases in the survey questionnaire is significantly recessed. In addition, we come across the result that there exists the hierarchy among the limitations. Idiomatic expressions are the hardest criterion when short-form negations tend to get combined. In the case of other limitations, Sino-Korean words, compound words, long-syllable words, and derivatives follow it.

      • KCI등재

        Translating Korean Negation : Based on the Lexically Layered Model

        Won, Hohyeuk,Kim, Hyoungyoub 한국중앙영어영문학회 2017 영어영문학연구 Vol.59 No.4

        This study explores the hierarchy of negative prefixes in English and Korean. English prefixes could be divided into class Ⅰ affixes and class Ⅱ affixes. Korean short-form negation has five limitations of prefixes, and Korean short-form negation has broader productivity, precedes negative prefixes, works in post-lexical boundary, and has word boundary. However, Korean negative prefixes have few applications and cannot transgress short-form negation, work in lexical boundary, and has syllable boundary. We could consider Korean short-form negation as a class Ⅱ affixes and Korean negative prefixes as a class Ⅰ affix. We also could apply this hierarchy to Korean-English translation&interpretation. With regards to long-form negation working in sentence boundary as class Ⅲ negation, the model matches each language’s negation to other language’s negation. If there are no appropriate expressions in one category, we move to a higher boundary. However, in spoken text, we return to class Ⅱ affixes when translating English to Korean because short-form negations are used more commonly in spoken text than long-form negations.

      • KCI등재

        Nanosyntactical Approach to Korean Negations

        Hohyeuk Won,Hyoung Youb Kim 한국중원언어학회 2020 언어학연구 Vol.0 No.54

        The purpose of this study is to explain Korean negations using the nanosyntactical method, in which even lexical items can be explained by the syntactically designed tree diagram. Unlike this approach, in DM the lexically related alternations are considered exceptions beyond syntactic boundary. According to Chung (2007) following DM framework, short-form negations must be an adverbial element located under the syntactic node, NegP. He maintains that the adverbial aspect of short-form negation grammatically allows short-form negations to appear in the sentence with NIPs element. Also, in the same research, ‘molu- (do not know)’ is counted as a lexically inserted expression resulted from the combination of two inter-fractions like ‘not’ and ‘know’. In this paper we will reanalyze the logical explanations more in detail. And, the nanosyntactical approach with the redesigned syntactic structure comprised of the nodes such as TNeg, FocNeg, ClassNeg and QNeg will be applied to refute the viewpoints. Thus, the properties of short-form negations and other negative prefixes can be accounted for more successively by arranging them under the disparate nodes like Q2Neg and Q1Neg respectively.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼