http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
Formation Characteristics of Propane Hydrate Using Fiber Layer
HIROYUKI KUMANO,Tatsunori Asaoka,Kento Sugaya,Yuta Mochizuki,Masashi Okada 대한설비공학회 2015 International Journal of Air-Conditioning and Refr Vol.23 No.4
Formation characteristics of propane hydrate using fiber layer were investigated experimentally. Water and propane gas contact in the fiber layer, and the propane gas hydrate can be formed continuously. In the experiment, pressure, temperature, the quantity of water and porosity of the fiber layer were varied as the experimental parameters, and the formation ratio and the formation rate were measured. As a result, it was found that the high formation ratio can be obtained by using the fiber layer. Therefore, it can be said that this method is useful to reduce energy consumption and to simplify the apparatus, since it does not need circulation system. Moreover, it was found that the formation rate increases with the subcooling and the quantity of water, and it is slightly affected by the porosity of the fiber layer
Preoperative Pain Control in Arthroscopic Rotator Cuff Repair: Does It Matter?
Hisahiro Tonotsuka,Hiroyuki Sugaya,Norimasa Takahashi,Nobuaki Kawai,Hajime Sugiyama,Keishi Marumo 대한정형외과학회 2019 Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery Vol.11 No.2
Background: The purpose of this study was to clarify the importance of preoperative pain control using corticosteroid injections in patients with persistent rest pain (RP) before arthroscopic rotator cuff repair (ARCR). Methods: A total of 360 patients (374 shoulders) who underwent primary ARCR and were followed up for at least 2 years were enrolled. After one-to-one propensity score matching, 266 patients (145 men and 128 women, 273 shoulders) were included in the study. Their mean age was 65.2 ± 7.7 years (range, 42 to 88 years) at the time of surgery. The patients were divided into three groups: those who required several intra-articular or subacromial bursa corticosteroid injections preoperatively for refractory RP (group A+), those in whom RP was resolved preoperatively (group A−), and those who had no RP and did not require any injections (group B). The incidence of postoperative RP and preoperative and final follow-up American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) scores were compared among the three groups. Results: The incidence of postoperative RP was significantly higher in group A+ (35/91 cases, 38.5%) than in group A− (10/91, 11.0%) and group B (7/91, 7.7%, p < 0.001 for both). The preoperative ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (33.2 ± 14.2) than in group A− (53.9 ± 11.9) and group B (62.3 ± 11.2, p < 0.001 for both), and it was significantly lower in group A− than in group B (p = 0.000). The final follow-up ASES score was significantly lower in group A+ (92.1 ± 8.4) than in group A− (97.6 ± 5.4) and group B (99.0 ± 2.5, p < 0.001 for both). There was no significant difference in the final follow-up ASES score between group A− and group B (p = 0.242). Conclusions: Patients in whom preoperative RP could be resolved before surgery achieved postoperative outcomes comparable to those in patients who had no RP before surgery, whereas the outcomes in patients with refractory preoperative RP were inferior. The results suggest that preoperative pain control is important in patients undergoing ARCR.