http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : Farhad Ghanbari (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
Ductility and strength assessment of HSC beams with varying of tensile reinforcement ratios
Mohammad Mohammadhassani,Meldi Suhatril,Mahdi Shariati,Farhad Ghanbari 국제구조공학회 2013 Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An Int'l Jou Vol.48 No.6
Nine rectangular-section of High Strength Concrete(HSC) beams were designed and casted based on the American Concrete Institute (ACI) code provisons with varying of tensile reinforcement ratio as (ρmin, 0.2ρb, 0.3ρb, 0.4ρb, 0.5ρb, 0.75ρb, 0.85ρb, ρb, 1.2ρb). Steel and concrete strains and deflections were measured at different points of the beam’s length for every incremental load up to failure. The ductility ratios were calculated and the moment-curvature and load-deflection curves were drawn. The results showed that the ductility ratio reduced to less than 2 when the tensile reinforcement ratio increased to 0.5ρb. Comparison of the theoretical ductility coefficient from CSA94, NZS95 and ACI with the experimental ones shows that the three mentioned codes exhibit conservative values for low reinforced HSC beams. For over-reinforced HSC beams, only the CSA94 provision is more valid. ACI bending provision is 10 percent conservative for assessing of ultimate bending moment in low-reinforced HSC section while its results are valid for overreinforced HSC sections. The ACI code provision is non-conservative for the modulus of rupture and needs to be reviewed.
-
Ductility and strength assessment of HSC beams with varying of tensile reinforcement ratios
Mohammadhassani, Mohammad,Suhatril, Meldi,Shariati, Mahdi,Ghanbari, Farhad Techno-Press 2013 Structural Engineering and Mechanics, An Int'l Jou Vol.48 No.6
Nine rectangular-section of High Strength Concrete(HSC) beams were designed and casted based on the American Concrete Institute (ACI) code provisons with varying of tensile reinforcement ratio as (${\rho}_{min}$, $0.2_{{\rho}b}$, $0.3_{{\rho}b}$, $0.4_{{\rho}b}$, $0.5_{{\rho}b}$, $0.75_{{\rho}b}$, $0.85_{{\rho}b}$, $_{{\rho}b}$, $1.2_{{\rho}b}$). Steel and concrete strains and deflections were measured at different points of the beam's length for every incremental load up to failure. The ductility ratios were calculated and the moment-curvature and load-deflection curves were drawn. The results showed that the ductility ratio reduced to less than 2 when the tensile reinforcement ratio increased to $0.5_{{\rho}b}$. Comparison of the theoretical ductility coefficient from CSA94, NZS95 and ACI with the experimental ones shows that the three mentioned codes exhibit conservative values for low reinforced HSC beams. For over-reinforced HSC beams, only the CSA94 provision is more valid. ACI bending provision is 10 percent conservative for assessing of ultimate bending moment in low-reinforced HSC section while its results are valid for over-reinforced HSC sections. The ACI code provision is non-conservative for the modulus of rupture and needs to be reviewed.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
