http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
( Abdullah Yasar ),( Amtul Bari Tabinda ),( Uzma Shahzadi ),( Pakeeza Saleem ) 한국화학공학회 2014 Korean Chemical Engineering Research(HWAHAK KONGHA Vol.52 No.5
The main focus of this study was the evaluation of arsenic concentration in the ground water of Lahore atdifferent depth and application of different mitigation techniques for arsenic removal. Twenty four hours of solar oxidationgives 90% of arsenic removal as compared to 8 hr. or 16 hr. Among oxides, calcium oxide gives 96% of Asremoval as compared to 93% by lanthanum oxide. Arsenic removal efficiency was up to 97% by ferric chloride, whereas95% by alum. Activated alumina showed 99% removal as compared to 97% and 95% removal with bauxite and charcoal,respectively. Elemental analysis of adsorbents showed that the presence of phosphate and silica can cause a reductionof arsenic removal efficiency by activated alumina, bauxite and charcoal. This study has laid a foundation forfurther research on arsenic in the city of Lahore and has also provided suitable techniques for arsenic removal.
Abdullah Yasar,Sadia Khalil,Amtul Bari Tabinda,Afifa Malik 한국화학공학회 2013 Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Vol.30 No.1
The study investigated the efficiency and cost effectiveness of solar-assisted photochemical processes in comparison with advance oxidation processes (AOPs) for the textile effluents treatment. Efficiency of UV irradiation alone for one hour in removing color was almost double in comparison to solar radiation alone for effluents of different dye concentrations (E1>E2>E3). For coupled UV/H2O2 process, there was higher color removal efficiency obtained for effluent E3 (85%) as compared to E2 (70%) and E1 (57%), while E1 showed higher COD removal efficiency (70%) as compared to E2 (50%) and E3 (62%). However, the efficiency of solar/H2O2 for COD removal was comparable to UV/ H2O2, i.e., E2 (57%) and E3 (53%). In the case of UV and solar-assisted photo-Fenton processes, removal efficiency of the UV process was further increased as approached to almost 90% removal for E1; on the other hand, the solar-assisted process efficiency remained the same. The relative efficiencies of AOPs were found to be in the order of UV assisted photo-Fenton process>UV/H2O2>UV alone. Although, solar-assisted Fenton treatments were relatively low and slow but without any energy consumption in comparison to high energy consumption of UV. Among the UV processes, UV assisted photo-Fenton treatment appeared to have better color removal efficiency with energy requirements of 5 kWh/m3, 8 kWh/m3 and 3 kWh/m3 for E1, E2 and E3, respectively.