http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
STI for SDGs 역량분석 및 글로벌 협력전략 -국가연구개발사업 분석 중심으로-
선인경(Inkyoung Sun),김왕동(Wangdong Kim),장용석(Yongsuk Jang),박환일(Hwanil Park),유지영(JiYeong Yoo),김소은(Soeun Kim),안지용(Jiyong An),강신애(Shinae Kang) 과학기술정책연구원 2021 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
Given all countries’ commitment to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), it has been emphasized that countries should try to accelerate the achievement of the SDGs by utilizing Science, Technology, and Innovation (STI) as a key tool. Korea has lagged in setting the national-level STI for SDGs directionality and integrating STI and SDGs. In contrast, major countries such as Japan, Germany, and China have proactively framed their STI R&D investment in the SDGs and actively promoted their contribution to solving global challenges in the international community. Considering the urgency of the STI for SDGs strategy development, this research conducts a quantitative analysis on STI for SDGs activities in Korea, mainly focusing on the national R&D programs for the recent three years. Despite quite a low level of understanding about SDGs among Korean scientists and engineers, it finds out that most public research in Korea shows a high level of STI relevance to solving the SDGs targets. Among the 17 SDGs, research on the SDGs 8 (energy), 9 (industry, infrastructure, and innovation), and 11 (sustainable city) are the most popular in Korea, while research on the SDGs 1 (poverty), 4 (gender equality), and 10 (inequality) are the least. The most general-purpose research and technology, which can be defined as a multi-SDGs contributor with a potentially high impact on the SDGs achievements, are disaster and safety research, climate, renewable energy, agriculture and fisheries, big data, and artificial intelligence, etc. This research develops four types of STI for SDGs strategies based on the SDGs implementation level and STI capacity defined as R&D inputs and outputs of Korea. Its results suggest that the Korean government seeks strategically a selective approach rather than a comprehensive approach to deal with all 17 SDGs. As for the weak areas such as SDGs 5 (gender equality), 10 (inequality), 13 (climate change), 14 (ocean ecosystem), 15 (land ecosystem), and 17 (global partnership), the government is recommended to take the “Global Inbound Strategy” for fostering STI for SDGs capacity through accelerating international STI collaboration. On the other hand, the “Global Outbound Strategy” is recommended for the strong areas such as the SDGs 4 (education), 9 (industry, infrastructure, and innovation), and 11 (sustainable city) to utilize so-called “Korea-made STI” for contributing to the SDGs achievement of other countries and the international community as a whole. In conclusion, the research calls for timely action for the national-level STI for SDGs strategy development, keeping in mind that the domestic challenges are eventually universal challenges facing all countries.
선인경(Inkyoung Sun),유지영(Ji Yeong Yoo),안지용(Jiyong An),김태경(Tae Kyung Kim),김현옥(Hyun-Ok Kim) 과학기술정책연구원 2020 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
This study explores the intersections of Science, Technology, and Innovation(STI) and international development cooperation in order to analyze the global trends of STI for Sustainable Development Goals(SDGs) in recent years. STI for SDGs means all discourses and activities occurring in the international community that utilize STI as critical tools to achieve SDGs. As the SDGs have brought changes in many aspects of STI-related development cooperation activities, the study focuses on emerging signals-in particular, application of frontier technologies and new actors’ participation-that are not the major components in STI for SDGs yet but may lead the global trends of STI for SDGs in the coming decade. Throughout intensive interviews with experts in Korea and overseas during the expert group meetings and contents analysis of the most updated data and information provided by those experts, this study examines about 30 pilot or new types of STI for SDGs projects initiated by international organizations, major countries, non-profit organizations, and private companies. A conceptual framework of STI for SDGs is developed in this research project and is expected to be practically useful to understand a variety of STI for SDGs efforts and discussions. STI is found to have three different roles in each path to facilitate the achievement of SDGs: STI as a solution, STI as a tool, and STI as information. This framework may present opportunities for policy makers to design and implement STI for SDGs and international STI collaboration policies and programs with more evidence-based approaches.
이정원(Jungwon Lee),선인경(Inkyoung Sun),김왕동(Wangdong Kim),박병원(Byeongwon Park),임덕순(Deok Soon Yim),김기국(Kikook Kim),김지현(Jihyun Kim),이향희(Elly Hyanghee Lee),전병우(Byung Woo Jeon),이선아(Suna Lee),민지혜(Jeehye Min),이종일 과학기술정책연구원 2020 정책연구 Vol.- No.-
The Korean government has introduced Official Development Assistance (ODA) Partnership Programs as part of efforts to increase the efficiency of ODA programs while addressing segmentations between grants and concessional ODA programs and projects. This research has significance in the development cooperation policy in Korea, given that the research addresses the confusion related to concepts and challenges regarding ODA Partnership Program, and it also provides policy recommendations to address such challenges. The research on the “Planning of ODA Partnership Program in STI” is conducted with two purposes: the first is to increase the effectiveness of Korea’s ODA programs and to revitalize integrated ODA programs, by analyzing the status and the challenges about current ODA integration policies and programs of the government. The second is to proactively respond to the demands of the Korean government in development cooperation policy and programs by providing planning cases of ODA partnership program in STI. The research consists of two parts: in the first part, the main challenges in ODA integrated policies and programs are identified through conducting in-depth interviews with practical experts from public agencies and universities in the development cooperation community. The research team also conducted a survey to further clarify the issues and to develop policy recommendations to address such challenges. Survey questions are elaborated on the basis of results of the in-depth interviews, and the survey was targeted the experts from implementing agencies of ODA projects and government officials from ODA related ministries. Based on the interview and survey results, policy recommendations for integrated ODA policy and programs are suggested. The second part is how to plan ODA Partnership Program in STI, which can be used by relevant ministries and implementing agencies of ODA projects. The research team developed a guideline for the planning of ODA Partnership Program in STI, which includes process and methodology for the program planning. Based on the guideline, pilot cases of ODA Partnership Programs in STI are developed targeting six countries such as Laos, Sri Lanka, Azerbaijan, Indonesia, Cambodia and Tunisia. The research emphasizes that partnership in STI ODA programs is one of the key policy directions in the development cooperation for the successful transition to the problem-solving ODA programs. With several findings and implications from reviewing challenges and limitations of the current policies regarding ODA Partnership Programs, the research provides policy recommendations about how to implement ODA Partnership Programs in an effective manner. The research also provides useful results for the practitioners of aid projects. The guideline in the research provides the procedures for planning an ODA Partnership Program from the perspective of practitioners. Another contribution of the research also can be found in the problem-solving oriented planning with a top-down approach and the systematic planning procedures for an ODA Partnership Program. The usefulness of the research can be found that pilot cases of ODA Partnership Programs are developed by applying the methodology for ODA Partnership Programs in STI. It is expected that the pilot programs are good references for the government and practitioners in the development and implementation of their future ODA Partnership Programs in STI.