http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
이경식,이경식 한국방송·미디어공학회 2018 방송과 미디어 Vol.23 No.3
최근 IoT 산업의 발달로 각 산업의 특색에 맞는 IoT 생태계를 구축하려는 옴직임이 활발하다. 이에 ITU-T, ISO, IEEE 등 여러 국제 표준화 기구에서는 완전 개방적인 사물 인터넷을 위해 공통된 표준의 필요성을 인지하고 활발히 논의 중이다. 특히, MPEG-IoMT(Internet of Media Things)에서는 탈중앙화된 미디어사물인터넷 시스템 구성을 위해 블록체인을 적용하려는 논의가 진행 중이다. 이에 본 투고에서는 블록체인과 MPEG에서 진행 중인 IoMT 프로젝트의 연관성에 대해 설명하고, 블록체인 기반의 미디어사물 간 거래 프로세스를 설명한다.
이경식,Lee, Gyeong-Sik 대한석유협회 1996 석유와 에너지 Vol.1996 No.11
이 자료는 이경식 한국은행 총재가 8월 24일 현정부 출범 이후의 전직 장ㆍ차관 모임인 마포포럼 하계수련회에서 강연한 내용임. <편집자 주>
20세기 셰익스피어 비평 : 심리적 접근법과 시적 접근법 Psychological Approach vs Poetic Approach
李京植 서울大學校 人文學硏究所 1980 人文論叢 Vol.5 No.-
This article aims at comparing and evaluating psychological and poetic approaches, the two dominant critical methods of the 20th century Shakespeare criticism, and historical approach, another form of the 20 century critical method, has been mentioned whenever necessary. Bradley's Shakespearean Tragedy which was the culminating product of psychological approach or character criticism was attacked by poetic approach later known as the New Criticism which argued that a Shakespeare play is a dramatic poem and should be dealt with as such but not as a character-novel. F.R. Leavis, L.C. Knights, D.A. Traversi-core members of the so-called Scrutiny group-and American New Critics were more or less successful in bringing about a general disparagement of Bradley's point of view as well as his psychological approach. Among them Knights was perhaps most effecient and persuasive in effecting the relegation of Bradley. In his ironical title 'How Many Children Had Lady Macbeth?' he argued that the most important thing in a play is the words on the page and that images and their verse setting should be given full consideration to. According to him, to stress character or plot is to impoverish the total response of a play and to detach a character from its natural surroundings is fatal to the proper understanding of the play. More often than not, champions of poetic approach went too far and reduced Shakespeare's plays to images and irony, explaining them as if they were a self-contained universe without any extraneous reference. As no critical method is absolute and foolproof, both psychological and poetic approaches were attacked by scholarship or historical criticism, which argued that Shakespeare should be interpreted in terms of Elizabethan political philosophy, stage conditions and dramatic conventions. Bradley's line of criticism, however, not only survived the salvo from both the historical and New Critics but also continued to prosper as critical works of so many devout Bradleyites and anti-New Critics witness. In conclusion, the ideal critical method could be obtained by integrating all the existing methods.