http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
金勳(Kim Hun) 한국의사학회 2005 한국의사학회지 Vol.18 No.2
This paper seeks to contemplate the background of the advent of acupuncture specialists and the social status of doctors including acupuncture specialists, by examining their activities of in the times of SunJo, GwangHaeGun, and InJo through the chronicles of Chosun Dynasty’s Official Records. In addition, the meaning of Lee Hyung Ik’s BunChimSool, which was even referred to as ‘peculiar’, and what diseases were meant to be cured by it were looked into.
金勳(Kim Hun) 한국의사학회 2004 한국의사학회지 Vol.17 No.2
The King Hyo-Jong is the 17th King in the Chosun dynasty. King Hyo-Jong carried forward the subjugation of the northern areas, but the subjugation of the northern areas was failed for the reason that he was died in 41 years old. After that time, his death is wrapt in a shround of suspicion, such as a rumor of killing by poison. But the cause of his death in direct was the septicemia arised from the boil. Besides, We suppose that he was afflicted with gout and renal failure.
金勳(Kim Hun) 한국토지공법학회 2007 土地公法硏究 Vol.36 No.-
Ased on Article 2 “Doctrine of Responsability of a fault” in the State Tort Liability Act, the completion of the obligation of compensation requires illegal actions of public official, that is, intentional fault.<BR> In the projective view to the “fault” doctrine of subrogating obligation denies the obligation of compensation in the case of illegality with no fault.<BR> Therefore, in the view of saving of victims, the concept of the fault should be in the need to be objective, and there were arguments that it is the violation of the responsibility of highly objective attention.<BR> In the result, from the Case 95 Da 38677 in Feb. 15 in 1996 that is sentenced by the supreme court, the light fault of the public official is the obligation of oneself, intentional heavy fault is deemed as subrogating obligation: the victim is acknowledged of the right of selective demand. In the latter case, the country can exercise the right to indemnity if compensating instead of the official.<BR> Nowdays in order to enlarge the range of the compensating obligations of the country, after considering the kind and degree of the infringement in addition to whether the action is illegal, “the illegality” should be admitted in the case of the lack of justifiability. The problem of “fault” may be right if considering as the violation of the responsibility of attention or the violation of the responsibility of general actions.<BR> Furthermore, if the action of the official infringes the basic rights, being the obligation of no fault naturally admitting the obligation of the compensation of a country would be better for a nation.