http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
연구개발서비스기업의 효율성, 생산성 및 생산성변화 결정요인 분석
황경연 ( Kyung-yun Hwang ) 한국생산성학회 2018 生産性論集 Vol.32 No.4
This study assessed the efficiency and productivity of R&D service firms using Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Sequential Malmquist Productivity Index (SMPI), while analyzing the factors that affect the productivity change of R&D service firms using the panel regression model. This study selected labor, capital, tangible assets and total assets as input variables, whereas, sales and operating profit where used as output variables for DEA and SMPI. Also, in this research, intangible assets, industrial property rights, capital adequacy ratio, in-addition to selling and administrative expenses were considered as factors influencing the productivity change of R&D service firms, based on existing empirical studies. In the empirical analysis, data on 66 R&D service firms from the last three years (2015 to 2017) were used. Results showed that CCR efficiency was 0.529, 0.474, and, 0.481, in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively, while BCC efficiency, in R&D service firms, was 0.599, 0.551 and 0.548 in 2015, 2016 and 2017, respectively. Even though, productivity, technology and scale efficiency increased by 6.0%, 15.4% and 2.1%, respectively, technical efficiency and pure technical efficiency decreased by 8.1%, and 10.1%, respectively in the same period. Panel regression analysis showed that intangible assets and industrial property rights had a positive effect on productivity change, while capital adequacy ratio, and selling and administrative expenses had a negative effect on productivity change. Finally, industrial property rights had a positive impact on efficiency change, whereas, capital adequacy ratio had a negative impact on efficiency change. Also, intangible assets, and selling and administrative expenses had no significant effect on efficiency change in R&D service firms. The results of this study will contribute to improve the efficiency and productivity of R&D service firms in practice. In addition, this study provides policy implications for the government to grow R&D service firms.
기술혁신능력 및 기술사업화역량이 경쟁우위에 미치는 영향: 대덕연구개발특구 수출기업을 중심으로
황경연 ( Kyung Yun Hwang ),성을현 ( Eul Hyun Sung ) 국제지역학회 2015 국제지역연구 Vol.19 No.1
본 연구는 대덕연구개발특구내 수출기업을 중심으로 기업의 기술혁신능력, 기술사업화역량 및 경쟁우위간의 관계를 분석하였다. 특히 본 연구에서는 수출기업의 기술혁신능력과 경쟁우위간의 관계에서 기술사업화역량의 매개효과를 분석하였다. 본 연구모형은 기업의 기술혁신능력, 기술사업화 및 경쟁우위에 관한 기존 문헌연구와 실증연구에 기초하여 설정되었으며, 이 연구모형 검증을 위해 대덕연구개발특구내 수출기업을 대상으로 수행한 설문조사를 통해 자료를 수집하였다. 설문조사는 2015년 1월 5일부터 2월 4일까지 약 1개월간 수행되었으며, 수집된 103개 수출기업 자료는 PLS분석에 활용되었다. 본 연구에서 기술혁신능력은 2차 구성개념으로 1차 구성개념인 학습능력, 전략계획능력, 연구개발능력, 제조능력 및 마케팅능력으로 측정되었으며, 2차 구성개념인 기술사업화역량은 1차 구성개념인 상용화속도, 시장범위 및 기술너비로 측정되었다. 본 연구의 실증분석결과에서 수출기업의 기술혁신능력은 기술사업화역량에 정의 영향을 미치고, 수출기업의 기술사업화역량은 경쟁우위에 정의 영향을 미치며, 수출기업의 기술혁신능력은 경쟁우위에 직접적으로 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 한편 수출기업의 기술사업화역량은 기술혁신능력과 경쟁우위간의 관계를 매개하는 효과가 있는 것으로 나타났다. This study aims to investigate the structural relationships between technology innovation capability, technology commercialization competence, and competitive advantage, focusing on the export firms in Daedeok Innopolis. In particular, this article attempts to analyze the mediating effects of technology commercialization competence on the nexus between a firm’s technology innovation capability and competitive advantage. The survey of 103 export firms was conducted from January 5, 2015 through February 4, 2015. Partial Least Squares analysis was applied to test the relationships between constructs set in the study. The commonality found in the results of the study is that a firm’s technology innovation capability has a positive effect on its technology commercialization competence and competitive advantage. The study also finds a solid evidence that a firm’s technology commercialization competence mediates the relationship between its technology innovation capability and competitive advantage while its technology commercialization competence used as mediating variable directly affects its competitive advantage, indicating that the null hypothesis of the non-existence of mediation effect can be rejected at the 5% significance level.
기업의 자원과 성과간의 관계에서 제품 및 공정혁신능력과 기술사업화역량의 역할 분석
황경연(Kyung-Yun Hwang),성을현(Eul-Hyun Sung) 한국기술혁신학회 2016 기술혁신학회지 Vol.19 No.1
본 연구는 기업의 보유 자원과 성과간의 관계에서 제품 및 공정혁신능력과 기술사업화역량의 역할을 분석하는데 목적을 두고 있다. 본 연구는 이를 위해 자원준거관점과 혁신 및 기술사업화 관련 실증연구에 기초하여 연구모형을 설정하고, 설문조사를 통해 수집된 대덕연구개발특구내 109개 기업 자료를 활용하여 검정하였다. PLS-SEM을 활용한 실증분석에서 기업의 인적 자원과 무형 자원은 제품혁신 능력과 공정혁신능력에 유의적인 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나 기업의 유형자원은 제품혁신 능력과 공정혁신능력에 유의적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났다. 또한 기업의 제품혁신능력과 공정혁신능력은 기술사업화역량에 유의적인 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났으나 기업성과에는 직접적으로 유의적인 영향을 미치지 못하는 것으로 나타났고, 기업의 기술사업화역량은 기업성과에 유의적인 정의 영향을 미치는 것으로 나타났다. 본 연구는 혁신능력을 제품혁신능력과 공정혁신능력으로 구분하고, 이러한 혁신능력이 기술사업화역량에 미치는 영향을 분석했다는 점에서 차별화된 연구이다. This study assesses the structure relationships between resource, product and process innovation capability, technology commercialization competence and performance of firms in Daedeok Innopolis. In particular, this study attempts to analyze technology commercialization competence that may be influenced by product and process capabilities. The development of the research model is based on the literature of resource-based view and the empirical studies of technology commercialization competence. The survey of 109 firms was conducted from January 5, 2015 through February 4, 2015. We investigate the role of a firm’s technology commercialization competence in determining its performance by performing Partial Least Squares analysis. The results indicate that a firm’s human resources and intangible resources lead to a higher level of its product and process innovation capabilities. This study, however, finds that a firm’s tangible resources do not have significant effects on its product and process innovation capabilities. And the study finds evidence that firm’s product and process capabilities have positive effects on its technology commercialization competence. The study also finds that a firm’s technology commercialization competence is a driving force behind its performance, showing that its technology commercialization competence positively involves its performance. In addition the study finds that technology commercialization competence mediates the relationship between a firm’s innovation capability and performance, indicating that the technology commercialization used as mediating variable positively affects its innovation performance.