http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
한현옥,서정환,이인권 한국경제연구원 2002 규제연구 Vol.11 No.1
Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) needs to consider the copyright attributes of goodwill BM developers because a number of Business Methods (BMs) in KIPO evaluation process to obtain official patent are those which embody similar level of information tech-knowledge into similar idea. It is desirable for KIPO to exercise multiple patent scheme on similar BMs unless one concerned party submits a solid evidence on illegal copying of the other. KIPO should leave the competing BMs m market test of the fittest survival. Such patent policy may contribute to the minimization of unnecessary social cost due to the frequent civilian infringement suits associated with BM patent in the near future. It is expected that competition issues in relation to BM patent exercise are four; 1) BM patent holders unduly refusal of patent licensing, 2) BM patent holders demand of unfair stipulation when he licenses BM patent, 3) cross licensing of BM patents, 4) buying of BM intellectual property. Korea Fair Trade Commission (KITC) needs to be cautious in applying Intellectual Property Guideline against such competition issues. KITC should fairly weigh positive effects against negative effects before final judgment of regulation because these competition Issues generally contain both effects.
한현옥,서정환,이인권 한국경제연구원 2002 규제연구 Vol.11 No.2
Korean Intellectual Property Office (KIPO) needs to consider the copyright attributes of goodwill BM developers because a number of Business Methods (BMs) in KIPO evaluation process to obtain official patent are those which embody similar level of information tech-knowledge into similar idea. It is desirable for KIPO to exercise multiple patent scheme on similar BMs unless one concerned party submits a solid evidence on illegal copying of the other. KIPO should leave the competing BMs m market test of the fittest survival. Such patent policy may contribute to the minimization of unnecessary social cost due to the frequent civilian infringement suits associated with BM patent in the near future. It is expected that competition issues in relation to BM patent exercise are four; 1) BM patent holders unduly refusal of patent licensing, 2) BM patent holders demand of unfair stipulation when he licenses BM patent, 3) cross licensing of BM patents, 4) buying of BM intellectual property. Korea Fair Trade Commission (KITC) needs to be cautious in applying Intellectual Property Guideline against such competition issues. KITC should fairly weigh positive effects against negative effects before final judgment of regulation because these competition Issues generally contain both effects.
한현옥(hyunok han) 한국경제연구원 2011 한국경제연구원 연구보고서 Vol.2011 No.4_2
Early actions are actions undertaken in the covered sector to reduce greenhouse gas(GHG) emission, prior to the establishment of an emission trading scheme(ETS). Early actions include not only early emission reduction but also R&D and investment in technology of reducing GHG emissions in the future. On the other hand, an offset represents project-based GHG reduction in the uncovered sector. The recognition of early action and offset could lessen the burdens of firms caused by ETS. In addition, early action could accelerate the achievement of environmental benefits from emission reduction and encourage firms to invest in R&D and innovation for abatement technology. The compensation for early action depends on the design of ETS. First of all, if the emission allowance is not allocated for free, the compensation for early action is not necessary. However, it is most likely that the emission allowance is allocated for free. Under free allocation, especially which is based on the historical emission, the recognition of early action gives an incentive not to postpone emission reduction until the implementation of ETS. However, too generous compensation gives rise to distorting incentive, hurting the environmental benefits. Thus, it is important to design optimal early action and offset program. The programs are not the same across countries. While countries such as USA, Canada issue credits for early action which can be traded in ETS, EU countries allow for early action in the allocation of emission allowance. Even though each country has its own program for early action, the standards for the eligibility of early action or offset are similar. In most countries, to be qualified for early action or offset, the reduction should be additional, real, permanent, quantifiable and verifiable. In coping with the commencement of ETS, therefore, firms should take early action according to these standards.