RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        사잇소리와 합성명사의 내부구조

        하세경(Ha Sekyeong) 한국음운론학회 2006 음성·음운·형태론 연구 Vol.12 No.1

          This paper discusses the morphological condition in the use of Sai-sori in modern Korean. Sai-sori typically appears in genitive sub-compounds and it is possible to classify compounds into two parts as follows : co-compound and non-genitive sub-compound versus genitive subcompound. This paper explores another factor to support such division. That is the meaning structure of compounds. Co-compounds and non-genitive sub-compounds can be decomposed into ‘N₁, syntactical relation, N₂’, but genitive sub-compounds can be decomposed into ‘N₁, syntactical relation, new lexical meaning, N₂’. According to the meaning structure, the former is simpler and more unmarked than the latter. Also the former is simpler and more unmarked in terms of morphological structure. Based on this, I hypothesize that an unmarked morphological structure depends on an unmarked meaning structure in the compounds not containing Sai-sori. Moreover, this paper discusses two exceptional cases. Unexpected use of Sai-sori in appositive subcompounds is explained by the fact that Sai-sori was an appositive case marker as well as a genitive case marker. The purpose-construction is considered as genitive subcompounds on the meaning structure but according to the property of meaning it may be regarded as non-genitive sub-compounds. Due to such twofold nature, exceptions often occur in purpose-constructions.

      • KCI등재

        용언 굴절과 동음이의어 회피 제약

        하세경(Sekyeong Ha) 사단법인 한국언어학회 2012 언어학 Vol.0 No.62

        This paper investigates the function of the allomorphs in modern Korean verbal inflectional paradigms, especially in ‘r’ final stem verb ‘r?’, ‘r?’ irregular verb. Because the phonological conditions of the allomorphs are not natural classes, allomorphs can not be explained by the pure phonological approach. When considering simultaneously these verb types, this paper proposes the systematic homophony avoidance constraint between two verb types. Without allomorphs ‘nanik’a(fly) and ‘nallas?(carry)’, two lexemes of ‘nal-’ and ‘nari-’ would have same word forms. Finally, by the Optimality theory this paper analyzes the standard inflectional verbal paradigms. IDENTITY Input Output(PHONOLOGICAL DIFFERENCE) demands the uniform correspondence of the phonological differences between two lexemes in the inflectional paradigms. And also using MAX IO(SEGMENT), DEP IO (SEGMENT), OPTIMAL PARADIGM constraints, this paper solves the problem of the right direction of the analogical leveling in verbal paradigms as well as the standard allomorphs.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼