http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 진희관 ( Chin Heegwan ) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
진희관(Chin Heegwan),진희권(chin heegwon) 21세기정치학회 2015 21세기 정치학회보 Vol.25 No.3
The purpose of this paper is to find the answer to the question on what is 'field survey', which is a term that first appeared in 2011. Accordingly, analysis was conducted by reviewing 207 news articles and reports not repeated that included the term 'field survey' in the title among the news articles and reports reported in Rodong Sinmun and Korean Central News Agency during February 2011 - December 31, 2014. Based on the summary of above results, the reason why top leader field survey and inspection were concentrated in the area of military units and the livelihoods of the public can be seen as the result of role allocation with Prime Minister. top leader is empowering cabinet system by showing his lack of direct involvement in the area of economy while indirectly providing guidance and control of cabinet through the Party, which can be seen as an attempt to alleviate the burden of top leader in the area of economy that has long been a task of the North Korean regime. In addition, Director of General Political Bureau appears to be concentrating on activities to gain full control of the military workforce by being responsible for 'construction of socialism' for which he is mobilizing the military, while assisting top leader right by his side. In the main areas of top leader's interest of military first policy and economy, it is thought that role allocation has been implemented for Director of General Political Bureau to be in charge of military first policy and Prime Minister in charge of economy. In regards to the full control of the military and livelihoods of the general public, Director of General Political Bureau appears to be in charge of the military, while Prime Minister is in charge of the livelihoods of the general public.
-
진희관 ( Chin Heegwan ) 북한연구학회 2017 北韓硏究學會報 Vol.21 No.2
The purpose of this study was to conduct analysis on how Works - literature of North Korea’s supreme leaders - emerged as well as contents, meanings and forms of Works of leader Kim Jong-Un. Five years on following the pronouncement of his Works, we may need now research focused on his Works. And this study analyzed characteristics of 53 Works North Korea asserted to have pronounced. So, in a bid to have a understanding and comparative analysis of emergence of the term ‘Works’, the study analyzed Works during Kim Il-Sung and Kim Jung-Il periods, targeting at articles including the term Works in Rodong-Shinmun. Kim Jong-Un’ Works was composed of writings in the diverse fields, while its emergence showed similarity with those of Kim Il-Sung and Kim Jung-Il in the past. Through Kim Jong-Un’s Works, the study was able to learn and ascertain the characteristics of his ruling methodology as well as his policy and stances. And it could also learn that the aspect of policies, in particular, consisted mainly of mentions about economic policies and Kim Jong-Un pursued the unity of people by pronouncing Works for a diverse range of classes for the purpose of ruling. And yet through the frequency of his mentioning, the study could learn of his keen interest in Youth League and the Boy Scouts. Given his short period in power, his Works was assessed to lack mentioning on diverse fields and subjects in comparison with those of leaders in the past. In light of the recent trend, it can be predicted that Works before and after the death of Kim Jung-Il would continue to be pronounced, though his Works so far was known to have been pronounced since his father’s death. Especially Korean Peninsula issue and unification issue all were mentioned only at the New Year’s addresses and the study predicts successive Works about them may continue to be made.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
