http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
조효원(Cho, Hyo-won) 계명대학교 인문과학연구소 2011 동서인문학 Vol.0 No.45
Walter Benjamin’s famous posthumous script “On the Concept of History” still remains somehow problematic and cryptic. One may, however, resolve the riddle of the text, if we focus on the aspect of Benjamin’s Messianism. It seems to be plausible that the concept and figure of “citation” is taken as a point of departure. Karl Kraus, the famous and prodigious writer in the fin-de-siecle Vienna, enormously influenced the mode and structure of Benjaminian thoughts and writings. As a constant reader of Kraus, Benjamin borrowed the esprit and strategy from the texts of Kraus ranging of newspaper articles to literary works. However, the core of these is to be found in the method of citation. One might summarize Benjamin’s citation-concept, which he renovated from the one of Kraus, in one short sentence: “The origin is the telos [Ursprung ist das Ziel].” This sentence is quoted from Kraus’ poetical works. In a critical essay about Kraus printed in the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (1931), Benjamin analyzed Krausian practices of journalistic writings and constructed a trilogy, i. e. “cosmic man [Allmensch]”, “demon [Damon]”, and “nonhuman [Unmensch]”. “Nonhuman” reveals the essence of the enigmatic figure of Benjaminian historical thoughts, Angelus Novus. It has two contradictory faces: the destructive one and the childlike one. The central thesis presented in this article suggests that these ambivalent aspects of the new angel can be confirmed in the juxtaposition of the ‘real’ Kraus and the fictional character ‘Kraus’ who appears in the novel Jakob von Gunten by Robert Walser. The real Kraus presents the destructive aspect of the new angel and the fictional Kraus the transient and fugacious one. This very ambivalence of Angelus Novus is the core of Walter Benjamin’s Messianism.
비감각적 유사성과 가족유사: 벤야민과 비트겐슈타인의 언어철학
조효원 ( Hyo Won Cho ) 조선대학교 인문학연구원 2012 인문학연구 Vol.0 No.43
Walter Benjamin and Ludwig Wittgenstein are contemporaries. Not only because they lived in the same period and had the almost same cultural background, but also they breathed in the exactly identical intellectual atmosphere, But what constructs their metaphysical contemporariness is first and foremost the issue of language (Sprache). This article aims to account for the correlation between the theories of unsensuous similarity (Benjamin) and of family resemblance (Wittgenstein). Espousing Detlev Schottker`s hypothesis that Benjamin highly envy Wittgenstein`s Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, this essay suggests that we could read the masterpiece of Wittgenstein in the final years, Philosophical Investigation as if it were written earnestly to reciprocate Benjamin`s sacarstic question (Was ist ``gelost``?) which he inserted in his One-Way Street. This virtuoso of literature (Schrifttum) from Berlin regards the language as an idiosyncratic space, while the fastidious philosopher in Cambridge metaphorizes it as a kind of city (scape) that ist comprised of old and new streets, buildings, and many an alley. That is to say, the one who follows their theory of language could or should imagine a labyrinth like metropolis streets which have diverse intensity and modality. And we might name it word-place-model (Wortplatzlehre). Benjamin and Wittgenstein precisely figure force of words as peculiar clouds in lifeworld(Lebenswelt) out by presenting them as an agency producing the singular place or atmosphere. With reference to this conception, the creaturely perspective, with which many a jewish intellectual brings his unique thoughts out in fin de siecle and the Weimar period, emerges as very noteworthy. For it points the perishability of worldly things out, and, moreover, makes us see the arcane interior of them. All in favour of Johann Peter Hebel, the pietistical german author in 18th century, both of them credited the creaturely perspective with accessibility to the innermost secret of worldliness. And they found this secret at the disfigurement of all creatures. This specific mark constitutes the unsensuous similarity/family resemblance of all creatures including human beings. The mission of intellectuals of utmost importance, then, is to translate the silent language of things into names. It means that they consider all things in this world, even themselves too, fugacious creatures. All human beings and things resemble in terms of their distortedness. All sounds in this world echo each other, because they are voices of creature. And all things in this world are similar in aspect of their brokenness. But this brokenness can be perceived only in the dimension of the wholeness (das Ganze). That Benjamin and Wittgenstein together, but in each way, did grasp this idiosyncratic affinity(Verwandschaft) between human beings and things is the quintessence of their philosophy of language, and at this point we watch a kind of surreal correspondence between two different thinkers.
심하게 흡수된 치조제에 Titanium 강화 Gore-Tex (TRG) 및 Titanium Mesh로 수직적 골증대술을 실시한 증례보고
김원직,윤경성,홍수련,최진경,이용욱,김동석,현종오,조효원,최지혜,정태웅,배윤기,권선규,최현준,이현수,양수남,Kim, Won-Jik,Yoon, Kyung-Sun,Hong, Su-Ryun,Choi, Jin-Kyung,Lee, Yong-Uk,Kim, Dong-Suk,Hyun, Jong-Oh,Cho, Hyo-Won,Choi, Ji-Hye,Jung, Tae-Woon 대한악안면성형재건외과학회 2011 Maxillofacial Plastic Reconstructive Surgery Vol.33 No.1
A severely vertical resorbed ridge is a significant challenge in implant dentistry. To solve this problem, several augmentation techniques, such as guided bone regeneration (GBR), onlay bone grafts, distraction osteogenesis, and ridge splitting techniques, have been proposed and used for several years. Among these methods, vertical ridge augmentation using guided bone regeneration aims to build space and guide osteoblasts to this space to promote osteogenesis. The aim of guided bone regeneration is to maintain and stabilize the space and block the proliferation of adjacent soft tissue. In our hospital, we encountered a case of a woman in her forties with an atrophied mandible, who underwent implant surgery in the right mandible. Titanium reinforced Gore-Tex (TRG) was used to augment the mandible and titanium mesh was used in the left mandible. Favorable results were obtained. This report compares the two methods and reviews the relevant literature.