RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        Power Transition or Peaking Power Trap in Explaining the Hegemonic Competition

        조해지,김우상 신아시아연구소 2023 신아세아 Vol.30 No.4

        In this study we focus on the oldest IR theory that correctly predicted the current Sino-US hegemonic competition and the newest theory that suggest an imminent collision between the two superpowers. We theoretically compare Organski’s (1958) power transition theory and Brands and Beckley’s (2022) peaking power trap theory and try to empirically test key arguments of both theories. Power transition theory suggests that the key independent variables that explain the great power war are power parity between the rising challenger and the declining dominant power, and the rising challenger’s level of dissatisfaction with the existing international order. In contrast, the peaking power trap theory argues that when a rapidly rising great power, which tries to catch up with the dominant power, begins to foresee its near-future economic stagnation, and when the dominant power tries to build and strengthen its alliance system against the rising challenger, the rising power is more likely to hasten to challenge the dominant power. Results of our study indicate that power transition war is very likely when the capability of the rising challenger becomes more or less equal to that of the dominant state and that war is highly likely when the rising state is dissatisfied with the status quo. These strongly support the power transition theoretic arguments. However, these do not totally reject the peaking power trap arguments since the peaking power situation occurs when the two states are more or less equal in their national capabilities. Our study demonstrates that it is not the overtaking of power or the peaking power but the power parity situation that matters most in explaining the likelihood of the power transition war.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼