http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
흡연 청소년의 신념, 친구교제, 통제력, 흡연 의도 및 자기효능에 대한 비교연구
김희경(Hee-Kyung Kim),최은숙(Eun-Sook Choi),문선순(Sun-Soon Moon),강현숙(Hyun-Sook Kang),강희숙(Hee-Sook Kang),박연숙(Yoen-Suk Park),신연순(Yeon-Soon Shin),안정선(Jung-Sun Ann),조순자(Soon-Ja Cho) 한국보건교육건강증진학회 2004 보건교육건강증진학회지 Vol.21 No.1
The purpose of this study was to compare beliefs about social rule, differential peer association, perceived behavioral control, intention of smoking, and self efficacy for rejecting smoking among smokers, reformed smokers, and non smokers in adolescence. The subjects were 576 adolescents in middle and high school, living in K city. The data was collected through questionnaires from December 1st to 18th, 2002 was analyzed using descriptive statistics, x2-test, and ANOVA. 1) The general characteristics and characteristics related to smoking among smokers, reformed smokers, and non smokers in adolescence showed differences as follows: sex, mother's education, monthly allowance, thinking about teacher's smoking, feelings about the smoking scene, thinking about father's smoking, drinking, satisfaction of school, and sexual experience. 2) Belief about social rule, differential peer association, perceived behavioral control, intention of smoking, and self efficacy for rejecting smoking among the three groups showed differences as follows: smokers have a lower belief about social rule, lower perceived behavioral control, lower self-efficacy for rejecting smoking, but higher differential peer association and higher intention of smoking than those of reformed smokers and non smokers. We recommend the development of a nursing program for anti-smoking behavior including the research factors affecting attitudes of smoking adolescents.
정재원 ( Jae Won Jeong ),김광수 ( Kwang Su Kim ),조순자 ( Sun Ja Cho ),이상준 ( Sang Joon Lee ) 한국환경과학회 2012 한국환경과학회지 Vol.21 No.9
This study was performed to evaluate the asbestos exposure levels and to calculate excess lifetime cacer risks (ELCRs) in asbestos-containing buildings for maintenance and management. The range of airborne asbestos concentration of 33 buildings was 0.0018 ~0.0126 f/cc and one site exceeded indoor air-quality recommended limit 0.01 f/cc, And ELCRs based on US EPA IRIS (Integrated risk information system) model are 1.5E-06 ~ 3.9E-05 levels, and there was no site showed 1.0E-04 (one person per million) level or more, and 11 sites showed 1.0E-05 (one person per 100,000 people) level or more. To prevent the release of asbestos fibers, it needs operation and maintenance of asbestos-containing building materials, and there are some methods such as removal, repairment, enclosure and encapsulation. In conclusion, a risk-based air action level for asbestos in air is an appropriate metric for asbestos-containing building management.