http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
조동준(Jo Dong-Joon) 21세기정치학회 2015 21세기 정치학회보 Vol.25 No.1
This paper shows that the three competing discourses related to slavery issues were interlinked with social forces in the 19th century England: political evangelism, ‘scientific racism,’ and liberalism. The three discourses came to be associated with social forces whose economic interests were compatible to the discourses. Also, it presents that the link between discourses and social forces reflects the changing economic environments. When the slavey was not abolished yet, commercial and industrial sectors allied with political evangelism and liberalism; plantation owners allied with Christian/‘scientific’ racism. In contrast, after the slavery was abolished, commercial and industrial sectors kept distances from political evangelism because of the economic dissonance between their economic interests and beliefs; plantation owners tried to invoke political evangelism to defend their economic interests. This case implies that researchers should extend the time span in their study of norms from emergence in domestic political configurations to internalization/adaptation. Multiple research paradigms need to be integrated in norm studies.
조동준 ( Dong Joon Jo ) 서울대학교 국제문제연구소 2014 세계정치 Vol.21 No.-
This paper compares the regional governance mechanism across the five regions: Europe, Americas, Africa, Arab, and East Asia. There has been a strong tendency to solve international issues by means of dyadic diplomacy and universal international organizations in East Asia. Meanwhile, regional organizations in East Asia have been weak and merely functional. The weakness of regional organizations in East Asia is a striking contrast to the fact that East Asia has been tightly integrated in terms of economic relationships. It may be called as the “Asian paradox.” There seem to be two explanations to the “Asian paradox.” First, ri-valries have been rampant in East Asia. China, Japan, and Korea still have had rivalries among them. There have been two divided nations: Korea and China. There have been rivalries in Southeast Asia. These rivalries have been hampering the development of regional organizations in East Asia. Second, the regional identity has been weak in East Asia. The tradi-tional culture in East Asia traces back to the two great ancient civilizations: Chinese and Indian one. Western cultures have been influential in modern days. Furthermore, the Cold War divided the East Asia into two camps. The Sino-US rivalry in the post-Cold War era has hampered the develop-ment of the regional identity in East Asia.
미국정치학회보에서 나타난 미국 정치학계의 연구동향, 1945-2005
조동준(Jo Dong-Joon) 한국정치정보학회 2010 정치정보연구 Vol.13 No.2
This paper presents three findings, after reviewing research papers presented at the American Political Science Review from 1945 to 2005. First, the journal shows the transition among the four research trends: formalism in the 1940s, behavioralism in the 1950-70s, post-behavioralism in the 1980-90s and Mr. Perestroika's reform in the 2000s. Also, the journal reflects the search for objectivity and generalization. which comes from the combination of the pragmatism, American political surroundings, and the job market in the discipline of political science. Third, the journal shows the widespread use of the null hypothesis significance test and the link between statistical significance and publication bias of research outcomes. 이 글은 1945년부터 2005년까지 미국정치학회보(American Political Science Review)에 게재된 연구논문의 연구분야, 연구방법, 연구대상국가 등을 분석한 후, 세 가지 연구결과를 보고한다. 첫째, 미국정치학회보는 1940년대 이전 구제도주의(formalism), 1950-70년대 행태주의(behavioralism), 1980년대 후기 행태주의(post-behavioralism), 2000년대 ‘개혁기’로 표현될 수 있는 큰 변화를 반영한다. 둘째, 미국정치학회보는 연구결과의 객관성과 보편성을 추구하는 경향을 보이는데, 이는 미국이 경험한 정치 환경의 특수성, 미국 정치학계의 실용주의, 고용기회에서 기인한다. 셋째, 통계분석에서 영가설유의도검증이 보편화되었고, 통계적 유의도의 충족 여부가 연구논문의 게재 편향성에 영향을 미친다.