러시아어 능동사전에 대하여

조남신(Cho, Nam?Shin),박수빈(Park, Subin) 한국사전학회 2016 한국사전학 Vol.- No.28

Active Dictionary of Russian(=ADR) is an new type of dictionary which aims at combining the latest achievements of linguistic theory with a practical usefulness for a wide range of language learners. ADR is an attempt at its radical modernization in adherence to modern lexicographic principles. In other words, integral description of language and systematic treatment of kindred linguistic phenomena, with the latest theoretical achievements in semantics, syntax, coᐨoccurrence properties and lexicalized prosody. We look forward to showing some lexicographic mechanisms in ADR against other dictionaries. A completely different way to systemize the meaning of words would be alternatives for all of us – grammarians, lexicographers, and laymen alike.

루돌프 보렌의 『설교론』과 현대문학의 관계

조남신(Nam Shin Cho) 한신대학교 한신신학연구소 2009 신학연구 Vol.55 No.-

내용과 형식의 일치에 관한 논의: 루돌프 보렌(Rudolf Bohren)의 이름신학적 설교학의 관점에서

조남신(Nam-Shin Cho) 연세대학교 신과대학(연합신학대학원) 2021 신학논단 Vol.105 No.-

The relationship between content and form was one of the most difficult but the most central topics throughout Western philosophy. They have also been one of the very important pairs of concepts in the fields of art and literature since the 18th century. The issue of the unity of content and form has also become an important issue not only in theology but also in language-related studies. Its confrontation can be said to have been reinforced by a paradigm shift called the empirical change after 1968. Such a change took place in the field of preaching as ‘the new homiletics’ movement. Now, as we enter ‘the era after the new homiletics movement’, issues such as the search for the unity of content and form in the crisis of church and preaching are bound to be raised again. This paper seeks to explore this problem, which can be said to be the longing task of Christian homiletics, in a pioneering way based on Rudolf Bohren’s homiletics and the emerging name theology. In such a case, what I want to seek will be a ‘name-theological, pneumatological, and aesthetic homiletics’, which pursues the unity of content and form, and uses the linguistics of faith, hope, and love. Therefore, I intend to open the way for the reconstruction of Christian theology and renewal of the church by continuously seeking alternatives through name theology.

비단일파생과 그 형태의미적 특성

조남신(Nam Shin Cho) 연세대학교 인문학연구원 1992 人文科學 Vol.68 No.-

설교의 기적과 인간의 섬김 사역

조남신(Cho, Nam-Shin) 한국신학연구소 2014 신학사상 Vol.0 No.166

본 논문의 목표는 보렌(R. Bohren)의 설교론을 중심으로 '설교의 기적과 인간의 섬김 사역'이란 주제를 신학적인 구도 속에서 고찰하는 것이다. 설교학에 있어서 이 주제영역은 하나님의 말씀과 인간의 말, 기적적인 것과 만들 수 있는 것, 기적과 기술, 성과 속, 내용과 방법 등의 양 차원을 포함한다. 보렌에게 있어서 기적으로서의 설교는 전적으로 '하나님의 일'이다. 그러나 경험론적 설교학이 주장하는바와 같이, 그는 또한 설교자의 관점에서 '인간의 일', 인간의 생산가능성의 측면도 강조한다. 그는 이와 같이 설교의 기적과 생산가능성 사이의 긴장관계, 기적과 기술의 변증법적 관계의 특성을 고려하면서 "설교는 인간이 만들 수 없는 일에 섬김 사역하는 일종의 생산가능성의 행위"라고 강조한다. 그래서 그는 설교사역에 대해서 인간으로서 할 수 없는 일을 감히 하는 모험이라고 묘사하기도 한다. 그러나 경험론적 설교학과는 달리, 무엇보다도 보렌은 성령론적 토대 위에서 하나님과 인간의 파트너십을 지칭하는 '신율적 상호관계성' 개념과 또한 설교의 기적의 실체로서의 하나님의 이름에 관한 사상을 그 중심에 갖다 놓으며, 신학적으로 그의 설교론을 전개한다는 점에서 차별적이다. 결과적으로, 내용과 형식의 일치, 즉 재료설교학과 형식설교학의 융합을 모색하는 차원에서 보렌이 주장하는 바, 설교의 기적에 대한 인간의 섬김 사역은 다음의 세 가지로 제시될 수 있다. ① 약속에 대한 믿음과 기적에 대한 기도, ② 호신명(呼神名, Namensnennung) 행위와 신율적인 예술과 기술, ③ 경외와 기쁨으로 그 이름의 능력을 증언하기. Das Ziel dieser Arbeit besteht darin, das Thema "Der menschliche Dienst am Wunder der Predigt" in einer theologischen Perspektive zu betrachten in Anlehnung an R. Bohrens Predigtlehre. Für Homiletik enthält dieses Thema die beide Dimensionen von Gotteswort und Menschenwort, Wunderbares und Machbares, Wunder und Technik, Heiliges und Profanes, Inhalt und Methode usw. Predigt als Wunder ist bei Bohren ganz Gottes Sache(opus Dei). Aber wie die empirische Homiletik behauptet, betont er auch mit Nachdruck, daß aus der Perspektive des Predigers durchaus das Predigen eine menschliche Tätigkeit( opus humanis) ist. Wobei er so die Spannung zwischen dem Machbaren der Predigt und dem nicht herzustellenden Wunder, bzw. die Eigentümlichkeit des dialektischen Verhältnisses zwischen Wunder und Technik überlegt, betont er, "daß Predigt eine Machbarkeit darstellt, die einer Sache dient, die Menschen nicht machen können". Er beschreibt also die Predigt darum auch als ein Wagnis. Aber Auffallend ist, daß anders als die empirische Homiletik er in der pneumatologischen Grundlage den Hauptbegriff "theonomer Reziprozität" und den Gedanken über den Namen Gottes in die Mitte seiner Predigtlehre legt, und daß er theologisch statt empirisch seine Predigtlehre entwickelt. Schließlich, wie Bohren behauptet in der Dimension, Einheit von Inhalt und Form, d.h. Verbundenheit zwischen materieller und formeller Homiletik zu suchen, läßt sich der menschliche Dienst am Predigtwunder dreierlei sagen wie folgt.: ① Glaube an der Verheißung und Gebet um das Wunder, ② eine theonome Kunst und Technik der Namensnennung, ③ mit Furcht und Freude die Macht des Namens zu bezeugen.

제1발표 ( 경영학 일반 ) : ORGANIZATIONAL LAG AND PERFORMANCE A COMPARATIVE STUDY OF TWO KOREAN AUTOMOBILE PLANTS

조남신 ( Nam Shin Cho ) 한국경영학회 1988 추계학술연구발표회 발표논문집 Vol.- No.-

하나님의 이름 언설의 원천으로서 성서 본문

조남신(Nam-Shin Cho) 연세대학교 신과대학(연합신학대학원) 2015 신학논단 Vol.81 No.-

한국소비재 신제품성패의 결정요인 분석

조남신(Cho Nam Shin),이진주(Lee Jin Joo) 한국경영학회 1980 經營學硏究 Vol.9 No.-

The modern decision environment is characterized by the presence of multiple objectives or goals, which are generally competing or conflicting. Therfore, it has been well established that virtually every decision making problem involves several key criteria. Mathematical programming techniques based on a single objective criterion such as cost minimization or profit maximization are restricted in application to real-world problems. Radford (14) contended that the goal of a global optimum solution should be discarded when considering complex and multiple objective decision problems. Under the modern complex decision environment, it is necessary to simultaneously consider all of the multiple and often conflicting objectives appropriately in selecting a best strategy or policy. Among the various techniques which have been developed to handle multicriteria decision making problems, goal programming is perhaps the most promising approach as it is an appropriate, powerful, flexible, and pragmatic tool. This technique was originally introduced by Charnes and Cooper (2, 3), and further developed by Ijiri (g) and Lee (11). The goal programming model can be solved through the use of a computer program based on an iterative algorithm. Currently, the most widely used computer program is Lee`s program (11) written in Fortran. Another popular algorithm was developed by Ignizio (7). Lee`s and Ignizio`s programs were designed using the modified simplex method. Lee`s and Ignizio`s programs did not consider efficiency in terms of the running time and storage requirements. Computational inefficiency results from unnecessary information being computed from iteration. to iteration. Recently Arthur (1) attempted to design a more efficient algorithm. This algorithm was tested in comparison with Lee`s algorithm in terms of computational time. Arthur`s goal partitioning algorithm is more efficient than the other two algorithms because it reduces the number of computations by modifying the matrix size when the number of subproblems increases and by eliminating unnecessary nonbasic variables. The critical disadvantage of this algorithm is its inability to provide the final optimal simplex tableau required to perform sensitivity analysis. This paper presents a new efficient GP algorithm based on the product represenation of the revised simplex method in order to overcome deficiencies of computational inefficiency on the part of the Lee and Ignizio algorithms and the lack of the final simplex tableau on the part of the Arthur algorithm.

관용구 ‘카라 베쉠 야웨’(qārā’ bᵉšēm JHWH, “야웨의 이름을 부르기”)에 관한 언어적 연구

조남신(Nam-Shin Cho) 한신대학교 한신신학연구소 2023 신학연구 Vol.60 No.2

The idiom, “calling on the name of Yahweh” that appears throughout the rituals in the Old Testament, as Gerhard von Rad noted, takes main function at the heart of the cult. The idiom by itself does not speak, but describes the act of repeatedly chanting the name of YHWH before the altar with the sacrifice. “Calling on the name of Yahweh”(Gen. 4:26; 12:8, etc) literally means to pronounce His name. Hendrik Antonie Brongers’ related study of this phrase has made a significant contribution to our understanding. He succinctly systematizes the work of previous scholars and defines the term as an official confession or hymn. The recent studies on the idiom, especially by William Quillian Parkinson, John Strazicich, and A. Tim Spann, lead us to conclude that the idiom “calling on the name of Yahweh” is to be a terminus technicus for legitimate YHWH-cults and YHWH beliefs. In terms of content, the idiom means ‘abad YHWH(worshiping Yahweh). ‘abad(worship), in the sense of invocare, includes more than just calling the name. Also, the idiom signifies that YHWH’s name is being proclaimed. And in terms of form, Yahweh’s name is not only called, but also proclaimed in the form of a creed or hymn, thanksgiving, praise, and petition. Seeing that this worship tradition of “calling on the name of Yahweh” is continued in the New Testament, we should not lose sight of its theological importance and succeed it.

한국기업의 국제거래 협상에 관한 질적연구: 이문화간 협상사례의 문화기술지적 접근

조남신 ( Nam Shin Cho ),김승철 ( Seung Chul Kim ),정용준 ( Yong Jun Jeong ) 한국협상학회 2004 협상연구 Vol.10 No.1