RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        A Micro-Costing Analysis of Flexible Bronchoscopic Intubation in a Korean Tertiary Hospital

        제의모,권병주,정희교,장철호,이한길,구성욱 한국보건의료기술평가학회 2022 보건의료기술평가 Vol.10 No.1

        Objectives: To evaluate the per-procedure cost of flexible bronchoscopic intubation in relation to the monetary value of the practice expense relative value units (RVUs) of the procedure. Methods: A micro-costing analysis of flexible bronchoscopic intubation was performed in the anesthesiology and pain medicine department of a Korean tertiary hospital over the fiscal year 2019. Cost records were collected and then categorized into three cost components: depreciation of reusable flexible bronchoscopes and video equipment, reprocessing, and repairs. The per-procedure cost was calculated by dividing the total annual cost by the annual number of flexible bronchoscopic intubations performed. The resulting per-procedure cost was then compared to the monetary value of the practice expense RVUs of the procedure. Considering that the annual procedural volume would significantly impact per-procedure costs and overall profitability, a deterministic sensitivity analysis (DSA) was conducted. Results: In total, 748 flexible bronchoscopic intubations were performed during the fiscal year. Total annual costs for depreciation of the bronchoscopes and video equipment, reprocessing, and repair were US$ 31,921, US$ 22,268, and US$ 22,948 respectively. The calculated per-procedure cost of the flexible bronchoscopic intubation in the period was US$ 103.1 while the fee listed in the fee schedule and the monetary value of the practice expense RVUs of the procedure were US$ 69.9 and US$ 52.2 respectively. Therefore, the procedure was performed at a loss over the period: the amount that the subject department lost with respect to the practice expense RVUs totaled as much as US$ 38,039. The DSA demonstrated that the procedure would remain unprofitable even if twice the volume of procedures were performed over the same duration (n=1,500). Conclusion: The findings suggest that HIRA’s determination of the practice expense RVUs of the procedure may have been underestimated and thus in need of review and recalculation to achieve adequate compensation. The per-procedure cost would vary by procedural volume and site of practice which indicates that a further multicenter study is required to confirm the study’s findings.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼