RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        국내외 석면피해 소송의 현황과 문제점

        정남순(Jeong Nam-Soon),전형배(토론자) 강원대학교 비교법학연구소 2009 환경법과 정책 Vol.2 No.-

        Recently many people who lived near asbestos mining in ChungCheongnamdo, S outh Korea were found to have asbestos-related diseases. The major use of asbestos started in the 1960s, however asbestos-related diseases may have not appeared more than 20 years after the exposure has occurred and the number of victims will increase in the future, therefore suits are expected to follow. Under the tort system, victims bear the burden of identifying a specific product, and proving that asbestos caused their illness. Victims also face difficulties in identifying the cause of the claimant's exposure, resulting in is a lag of several years between the filing and resolution of a suit. Furthermore, suits by impaired claimants have bankrupted companies. In America and Japan, there is widespread agreement that the current tort system does not fairly compensate asbestos victims. As a result, the bill was enacted and made into a bill in Japan(Introduced in the U. S. Senate). The purposes is to ensure that people who become sick, as a result of exposure to asbestos, are compensated surely, fairly, and quickly. Our current tort system lacks the capacity to resolve the claims of asbestos victims. It is time to make a social consensus that creates an alternative compensation system to better resolve the claims of these victims and maintain some surveillance programs.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼