http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.
변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.
- 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
- 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
RISS 인기검색어
- 검색키워드
- 저자 : 전미경(Mee-Kyung Jun) (검색결과 2 건)
- 무료
- 기관 내 무료
- 유료
-
알코올 중독자와 일반인의 음주동기와 부정적 정서에 관한 비교 연구 - 알코올중독 치료전문병원을 중심으로 -
전미경(Mee-Kyung Jun),한우상(Wou-Sang Han),정종일(Jong-Il Jeong),이기원(Gi-Won Lee),김태우(Tae-Woo Kim) 한국중독정신의학회 2003 중독정신의학 Vol.7 No.2
Objective:This study was performed to compare the drinking motives and negative affects such as depression, anxiety and anger between alcoholics and nonalcoholics. Subjects and Methods: Subjects examined in the study were 51 Korean alcoholic patients from two mental hospitals and 73 controls. All subjects were assessed using the Seoul National Mental Hospital Alcoholism Screening Test, drinking motive questionnaire, State-Trait Anxiety Inventory, State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory, and Beck Depression Inventory. Results:1) In alcoholics, the enhancement, coping, and conformity motives were significantly higher than in controls (p<0.05). Alcoholics viewed drinking motivations first as a coping motive and secondly as a social motive respectively. Controls viewed drinking motivations first as a social motive and secondly as a coping motive respectively. 2) For negative affect, alcoholics scored significantly higher than controls in depression, anxiety and trait anxiety (p<0.01). 3) In alcoholics, four drinking motives were not correlated with negative affects. In controls, four drinking motives were correlated with negative affects with the exception of depression (p<0.05). Anxiety was the most significant variable accounting for the coping motive and the conformity motive (p<0.05). Conclusions:Drinking motives were different between alcoholics and controls. In controls, anxiety had a significant effect on drinking motivations linked to both coping and conformity motives, so multiple appropriate assesment and inter-vention strategies are needed for alcoholic problems.
-
일 정신병원의 알코올리즘 치료 프로그램의 중도 퇴원 환자들의 특성
정종일(Jong-Il Jeong),한우상(Wou-Sang Han),전미경(Mee-Kyung Jun),이기원(Gi-Won Lee),김태우(Tae-Woo Kim),김진영(Jin-Young Kim),신경철(Kyung-Chul Shin) 한국중독정신의학회 2004 중독정신의학 Vol.8 No.2
Objective:This study was performed to compare the sociodemographic, clinical variables, self-efficacy, drinking motive, personality characteristics such as impulsivity, sensation-seeking, and insight between the completion group and dropout group. Subjects and Methods:Subjects served for the study were 63 Korean alcoholic patients who participated in an alcoholism treatment program. All subjects were assessed using the Seoul National Mental Hospital Alcoholism Screening Test, the alcohol use inventory, the drinking motive questionnaire, the Barratt impulsivity scale, the Zuckerman sensation seeking scale, the self-efficacy scale, and the Hanil Alcohol Insight Scale. Results:In summary, the results of this study were as follows:1) 29 of the 63 subjects were dropped out, so the dropout rate was 46.1.%. 2) The numbers of patients who completed program was significantly higher among patients of semivoluntary admission than among patients of either voluntary or involuntary admission. 3) There was a relative tendency, not so prominent in a statistical sense, that the drinking style is more severe in the dropout group, 4) The incident of alcohol-related medical diseases was significantly higher in the dropout group than in the completion group. 5) The number of patients who completed the program was significantly higher in the ‘fair insight group’ than in either the ‘poor insight’ or ‘good insight group’. 6) In the dropout group, the scores of all drinking motives were higher than in the completion group. It was especially noted that the enhancement and conformity motive scores were significantly higher in the dropout group than in the completion group. 7) In the completion group, there were no correlations among drinking motives, AUI subscales, and HAIS score. However, in the dropout group, each drinking motive correlated with the AUI subscales in a different pattern; additionally, the coping motive correlated with the HAIS score. 8) The most common reasons noted for dropout were psychosocial ones, lack of interest in the program, and difficulties to follow the program. Conclusions:Between the completion group and dropout group, there were some differences in the mode of admission, drinking style, alcohol-related medical diseases, insight level, drinking motives and in their correlation pattern with the AUI subscales and HAIS scores. Considering these characteristics and the reasons of dropout, we can improve future treatment program adherence.
연관 검색어 추천
이 검색어로 많이 본 자료
활용도 높은 자료
