RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        독립기념관의 자료수집 현황과 과제

        장세윤 ( Chang Sei-yoon ) 한국민족운동사학회 2001 한국민족운동사연구 Vol.27 No.-

        The Independence Hall of Korea collected data(69,000 pieces) on independence movement from Aug. 1983 till the end of Dec. 2000. About 8,000 pieces of them are on exhibition at 7 standing exhibition halls, and the rest of them are in storage at the storehouse, and used for special planning, research and publication as occasion needs. Also at the photo department has about 8,000 copies film and related photos, and the attached library has about 33,000 volumes of independence movement related books, which is open to the public. General data except photos and books are preserved and utilized as ① general donation and purchase data ② An, Chang-ho’s(安昌浩) data ③ Heungsadan’s(興士團) data ④ Seo, Jae-pil's(徐載弼) data ⑤ data of Jungang Educational Training Center ⑥ data donated by Lee, Jong-hak(李鍾學) ⑦ reproduced data ⑧ commissioned data ⑨ micro-film data. Most data are those contributed by general people. These data the Independence Hall of Korea has are compose of books, documents, photos, which is a different character compared to other museums. However, these data are useful for research and reference, but most of them are not suitable for exhibition, so its own specialization plan should be devised. As a result of reviewing the status of collecting data, considerable problems and imminent problems have come to the surface. At first, the problem that the specialized personnel in charge of collecting, managing, exhibiting, studying on data is lacking. And other problems to reform include the insufficiency of data collecting budget, exclusive organization data analysis, adjustment and use. To solve these problems, the following reforms should be devised. ① positive reform will of the management, ② consolidation of data research, collection, exhibition and research function, ③ security of specialized personnel and sufficient budget, ④ searching for effective data collection system and utilization plan, ⑤ training database(information strategy) and exchanging activation of experts.

      • KCI등재

        관동대지진 때 한인 학살에 대한 『독립신문』의 보도와 그 영향

        장세윤 ( Sei Yoon Chang ) 수선사학회 2013 史林 Vol.0 No.46

        On September 1, 1923, the Great Kanto Earthquake struck the Kanto region of Japan, including Tokyo, causing widespread damage throughout it. Koreans living in the region were no exception. Furthermore, misunderstanding and prejudice toward Koreans during the Japanese colonial period resulted in the most tragic incident suffered by Koreans during the Colonial Period (1910-1945), namely, the Massacre of Koreans in 1923 by Japanese civil militia and other groups in the wake of the earthquake. Ninety years have passed since the tragedy, which was instigated by the imperial Japanese government amid the terrible chaos caused by the massive earthquake. The full facts behind the massacre, including its implications and lessons, have yet to be thoroughly investigated and discussed by contemporary Koreans living through an age of prosperity that owes a lot to the sacrifices of their ancestors, who struggled against the Japanese colonial rule. Korea is now faced with the difficult challenge of fully investigating how Japan has dealt with the massacre not just in its research papers but also in its classrooms and civic movements, over and above the genuine efforts made by Koreans in their academic studies, history education and citizen campaigns about the massacre.In the aftermath of the earthquake, the Japanese government quickly declared martial law, which is why there were very few reports on the additional sufferings of Koreans during the earthquake. The massacre of Koreans in 1923, in fact, was committed jointly by the Japanese military, police, and vigilantes. The crime was ultimately overshadowed by the coverage of the earthquake damage both in Japan and abroad at that time. One significant exception was the coverage of the massacre by The Independence, an official newspaper of the Korean Provisional Government based in Shanghai, China. In its extradated September 4, 1923, i.e. four days after the earthquake and the massacre of Koreans, the paper published a report on the earthquake and the massacre. The following day, December 5, the newspaper wrote that 6,661 Koreans had been killed by the Japanese during the massacre, causing a tremendous commotionin the Korean community across the world. The coverage by The Independence of the Massacre of Koreans during the Great Kanto Earthquake has greatly impacted academic and educational institutions at home and abroad. The newspaper`s report on the number of Koreans massacred during the earthquake in 1923 is still considered to be relatively precise because it was based on the investigations not only of correspondents of the newspaper based in Japan but also of many Koreans who were living in the Kanto region at the time. That is why the newspaper`s coverage has been widely referred to at home and abroad. There is a consensus among academic and educational institutions in South Korea, North Korea and Japan that around six to seven thousand Koreans were killed by the Japanese during the massacre. Now, it is a case of an historic mission that Korea, and particularly its academic circles, must carry out to identify all the victims, investigate every aspect of the massacre, and hold all those who participated in the massacre accountable. In the end, a lesson must be learned from the tragedy to make the victims` deaths significant. It is our job to figure out how we can remember them, too.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재
      • 한국학계의 재만한인 이주사 연구 동향

        장세윤(Chang, Sei Yoon) 전남대학교 글로벌디아스포라연구소 2011 전남대학교 세계한상문화연구단 국제학술회의 Vol.2011 No.2

        China’s ethnic minority policy has been implemented relatively well based on the principles of minority self-rule and equality and unity. However, in a long-term perspective, the policy is that of gradual and indirect assimilation. On top of the limits of the “minority,” minority ethnic groups living mostly in agricultural and border regionsare threatened by capitalist trends such as the economic reform and opening, rapid economic growth, wide-ranging industrialization and urbanization, and adoption of the market economy. In particular, the Korean nationality in China’s Northeast (Manchuria) faces a serious crisis of dissolution due to the North Korean crisis and refugees since the 1990s, illegal immigration to the Republic of Korea, movement to urban and central Chinese regions due to industrialization and the open policy. Moreover, the Yanbian Korean Autonomous Prefecture faces a predicament of Korean population decrease, lowering of education quality, family crisis, dissolution of the agricultural social structure, and assimilation to Han Chinese culture. The time requires a many-sided strategy to solve the problems. The ethnic Korean society in China is affected by the adoption of the capitalist system and the decrease in the state support as much as the policies and influences of the Chinese Communist Party and government. The trends of a high degree of assimilation into Han Chinese, rapid urbanization and globalization have more effect on Korean society in China. The solution to this crisis depends on Korean nationality’s correct analysis of the crisis and finding an effective measures and strengthening community’s capability. A few scholars explain the current situation as the pains of the shift from the agricultural to urban social setting. However, without strong ethnic identity and education and formation of new centers of community, dissolution of Korean society and assimilation into the mainstream Chinese society will only accelerate. To overcome these problems, it requires formulation and implementation of a multifaceted development plan based on particularity of the Korean ethnicity and generality of the Chinese society.

      • KCI등재

        만보산사건 전후 시기 인천 시민과 화교의 동향

        장세윤(Chang, Sei-yoon) 인천대학교 인천학연구원 2003 인천학연구 Vol.2 No.1

        So-called‘ Manbosan Incident’broken out at Wanpaoshan, Changchun county, North-east area of China(Manchuria) on July 2, 1931 was caused by the conflict of Korean and Chinese peasants. But the Chosun Ilbo distortedly reported this incident, so attack on overseas Chinese merchants took place at Incheon in Korea for the first time on July 3. Then boycott agitation to overseas Chinese merchants developed on a large scale throughout the country including Seoul, and Pyungyang. This incident too the opportunity to have a great effect on three states of Norh-east Asia, Korea?China and Japan. From the viewpoint of regional history, Manbosan Incident much influenced Incheon and other regions at home. This incident Koreans putting down Chinese at Inheon, Pyungyang and Seoul at the beginning of July, 1931 created a great sensation at one time. However, since then, both Korean and Chinese people represented looks to get over temporary hardship, and gradual solidarity. For this reason, Japanese Kwantung Army formulating the core power of Japanese imperial incursion finally waged ‘9.18 disturbance’(so-called Manchurian invasion) committing overall invasion to Manchuria on Sept. 18, 1931. Originally attack incident on overseas Chinese merchants at Incheon has been simply known as‘ a riot’. But as a result of this researcher’s review, new facts and characters were made clear. At the first stage, it was developed in rebellious phase. However, as the state of affairs was expanded, anti-Japanese character was manifested, triggering a plan to develop anti-Japanese demonstration campaign. This riot undertaking plan ended in a failure due to the suppression of Japanese police, but subsequently this incident took the opportunity to develop anti-Japanese strife, which has a significant meaning. Attack on Chinese people at Incheon at the beginning of July 1931 can be said to be a representative example having not a little effect on the history of modern Korea and North-east Asia. Thus it is more urgent to establish the concept and identity of Incheon studies(research into Incheon region), and conduct further study on it.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼