RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        후두에 발생한 원발성 림프종

        이호중,권오진,우승훈,Lee, Ho Joong,Kwon, Oh Jin,Woo, Seung Hoon 대한후두음성언어의학회 2013 대한후두음성언어의학회지 Vol.24 No.2

        Primary lymphoma of the larynx is rare, accounting for less than 1% of all laryngeal neoplasm. Early symptoms are ambiguous and nonspecific, and confirmation of the diagnosis is often difficult. The aim of this study was to report the experience of our department in the management of these aggressive lesions, as they require special diagnostic and therapeutic attention. We enrolled 3 patients who diagnosis of lymphoma involving the larynx were retrospectively reviewed. The histopathological diagnosis revealed 1 case of diffuse large B cell lymphoma, and 2 case of NK-T cell lymphoma. Details of the presentation, diagnostic procedures, treatment, and outcome of these patients were presented. Primary laryngeal lymphoma is a rare entity. Early symptoms are subtle and nonspecific, and confirmation of the diagnosis is often difficult. Because of the rarity of this tumor type, the optimal management remains controversial and it seems that should be managed not as a distinct disease entity but as an unusual presentation of non-Hodgkin lymphoma, according to the recent treatment trends.

      • KCI등재
      • 아동학대개입시 상담원의 신변보호를 위한 법제도적 개선방안

        이호중 서강대학교 법학연구소 2009 서강법학 Vol.11 No.1

        The Korean justice system in dealing with child abuse encompasses two distinct subsystems : the criminal justice system and the child protection system. These subsystems are functioning as separate, and the major mission of child protection service(CPC) workers is to provide the maltreated children and their family with appropriate protection services. But many CPS workers have experienced violence or any other threats to their safety in working with children's parents or other guardians. This may impede the effectiveness of child protection intervention. This paper reviews the interactions between these two subsystems in intervention of child abuse cases and proposes that safety of CPS workers can be enhanced by structural improvement of cooperation relationship between CPS workers and police officers. Typically child protection agencies initially screen out the cases based on many suspicions and other informations, and the cases are referred to police and prosecutors only when the CPS worker has an opinion that the seriousness of the case justifies the punishment. This practices expose the CPS worker to serious danger, because it seems to be that the CPS worker executes their duties just like a police officer. So this paper suggests that the coordinate cooperations system between CPS worker and police officer should be anchored in our two-track system. Especially when CPS workers have information that indicates that the family behavior or situation could pose a danger to CPS worker, they must coordinate assessment and intervention activities with police officers.

      • 검찰에 대한 민주적 통제와 검찰개혁의 과제

        이호중 서강대학교 법학연구소 2007 서강법학 Vol.9 No.2

        In spite of fruitful judiciary reform promoted by the Government, the Korean Prosecution still has an unregulated strong power and authority in criminal investigations and in court. So far as the prosecution is concerned, the reform is not completed, because the major issues of judicial reform have focused only on the reformation of the criminal process rather than the democratic control over the judicial agencies, especially the prosecution. So this article raises the important, unended reform issues to procure democratic control over the prosecution. The uncompleted reform agenda are those : 1) democratic regulation over the prosecutor appointment system, 2) reform of the hierarchic structure of the prosecution, 3) rational control against the power to indict by citizens, 4) demanding the prosecution to play an active roll for retrial of the past unlawful judgements. This article suggests that the reform of the prosecution is not fulfilled until the power of the prosecution should be managed democratically by the ordinary citizens.

      • KCI우수등재
      • KCI등재후보

        회복적 사법의 이념과 실무

        이호중 梨花女子大學校 法學硏究所 2009 法學論集 Vol.14 No.2

        회복적 사법은 사회공동체와 구성원의 자발적 참여를 그 핵심가치로 한다. 사회공동체는 범죄가 발생한 지점이며 동시에 범죄로 인한 갈등이 해결되어야 할 공간이기 때문이다. 갈등 해결의 메커니즘이 ‘형사사법체계에 의한 권력적 제도화’에서 탈피하여 ‘일상화’되어야 한다는 회복적 사법의 이념은, 범죄자-피해자-사회공동체의 연계 안에서 ‘유대관계’의 회복에 주안점을 둔다. 우리의 경우에도 회복적 사법의 제도화 노력이 나타나고 있으나, 사회공동체의 자생적 기반이 거의 없으므로, 이러한 국가의 형사사법기관이 주도하는 회복적 사법 프로그램은 형사사법기관의 체계논리 내지 기관이익에 보다 편향된 모습으로 등장하게 될 위험이 도사리고 있다. 회복적 사법의 절차를 통해 범죄자와 피해자 및 사회공동체의 사회적 유대를 회복하는 데 기여할 수 있으며, 또한 회복적 절차는 전통적인 형사제재가 가져올 수 있는 범죄자에 대한 낙인 및 탈사회화 등의 부작용을 최소화할 수 있다. 따라서 회복적 사법은 공식적인 형사사법체계 속에서 단순히 다이버전의 한 수단으로 볼 것이 아니라, 관할 면에서 형사사법체계보다 우위에 두어야 한다. 대신에 형사사법체계는 회복적 사법의 갈등 해결 메커니즘이 제대로 작동하지 못하는 경우를 대비한 디폴트시스템으로 기능하여야 한다. 그리고 그 디폴트시스템은 공동체 구성원들의 적극적인 참여 속에 제어되어야 한다. 우리 사회의 공동체 속에 회복적 사법의 가치가 뿌리내리고 범죄자와 피해자 그리고 공동체 간의 유기적이고 연대적인 관계회복을 지향한다면, 회복적 사법의 진정한 가치가 구현될 수 있을 것이다. The core value of the Restorative Justice is a voluntary participation for community and each member of the community, because community is not only the spot where the accident took place, but also the place where the conflict-solving is needed. The ideology of the Restorative Justice, which is that conflict-solving mechanism should be ‘routinized,’ breaking away from powerful institutionalization for Criminal Justice, focuses on restoring relationships within the connection of victims, offenders and community. Although we try to institutionalize the Restorative Justice, there is no basis for autogenous to community. Therefore, the Restorative Justice, mainly taken the lead by Criminal Justice System, has the risk that it only concerns with Criminal Justice System’s logics and its profits. In the process of Restorative Justice, it is possible to restore the relationships among victims, offenders and community. In addition, it can minimize the side effect of traditional punishment, such as branding to offenders and de-socialization of offenders. Therefore, it is not just a means of diversion, but a good solution which is superior to Criminal Justice. Criminal Justice can be used as a default system preparing for malfunction of the Restorative Justice and it should be controlled by community member’s active participation. When Restorative Justice successfully put down roots in Korea and with the aim of restoring organic and joint relationships among three parties, the true value of the Restorative Justice can be realized.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼