질산증기 또는 공기로 산화된 등방성 핏치섬유의 탄화

이진기,인세진,이보성,유승곤 ( Jin Ki Lee,Se Jin In,Bo Sung Rhee,Seung Kon Ryu ) 한국화학공학회 1991 Korean Chemical Engineering Research(HWAHAK KONGHA Vol.29 No.4

Isotropic pitch fiber was oxidized with nitric acid vapor and hot air respectively. Carbonization characteristics and mechanical properties of these fibers were investigated by changing the heating rate of carbonization to get the optimum oxidation and carbonization conditions of pitch fibers. Two types of oxidized fibers show quite different weight loss curves during carbonization because of different functional groups. Nitric acid vapor could reduce and shorten the oxidation temperature and time of pitch fibers comparing to hot air without lessening the mechanical properties of carbon fibers.

태아의 권리능력에 관한 이론의 재평가

이진기(Lee, Jin-Ki) 한국가족법학회 2013 가족법연구 Vol.27 No.3

gehört der Rechtsstreit über Rechtsfähigkeit des nasciturus solchen Rechtstheorien, die für den Zweck der juristischen Ausbildung regelmäßig den Anfängerstudentinen und studenten am Angfang vorgestellt werden. Passend zum Gewicht hat er theoretisch vollständig und auch frei von dem Widerspruch zu sein, Aber es ist in der Rechtspraxis scheinbar nicht zu erreichen. Die bisherigen Rechtstheorien, nämlich sog. aufschiebende und auslösende Konstruktion, können nicht automatisch dem Rechtsfalle des nasciturus angewendet werden. Die Gesetzgeber hatten vor, die Fragen um die Rechtsfähigkeit des nasciturus einzel und kasuistisch au regulieren, denn es kam ihnen schwierig und gar unmöglich, sie mit einer einheitlichen Erklärung zu lösen. Das zeigt uns bereits, der Versuchkann nur gescheitert werden, die Rechterscheiung uniform mit Hilfe einer Theorie zu begründen. Das ist ein wichtiger Grund dafür, daß wir einen anderen Weg finden zu müssen. Einen Schlüssel bietet §858 KBGB, der die Anerkennung der Vaterschaft für den nasciturus. Wer den nasciturus anerkennt, der hat ihn Unterhalt gewähr zu leisten. Daraus folgt, der nasciturus auch Unterhaltsanspruch dem Vater gegenüber bekommt. Problmatisch ist dabei, daß weder aufschiebende noch auslösende Konstruktion dieses Phenomen vernünftig betrifft. Das sagt, der Versuch einer Begründung mit einer Konstruktion nie gelungen ist. Wichtig ist, die Lösung liegt bereits im Schutz und Fürsorge des nasciturus.

Acute Posterior Multifocal Placoid Pigment Epitheliopathy 1예

이진기(Jin Ki Lee),한승욱(Seung Wook Han),안태욱(Tae Wook Ahn) 대한안과학회 1986 대한안과학회지 Vol.27 No.4

유증제도의 새로운 이해

이진기(Lee Jin Ki) 한국가족법학회 2016 가족법연구 Vol.30 No.1

Nach dem koreanischen BGB besteht das Vermächtnis aus zwei Arten, nämlich Universalvermächtnis und Spezialvermächtnis. §1078 KBGB lautet: “Wird eine Erbschaft dem Vermächtnisnehmer universal zugewendet, so hat er gleiche Rechte und Pflichten wie der (ins. gesetzliche) Erbe.” Die herrschende Meinung und die gerichtliche Entscheidung sucht aufgrudn dieser Vorschrift die gleiche Rechtsstellung des Vermächtnisnehmers wie die eines eingesetzten Erben. Aber das ist Irrtum. Durch die letztwillige Erklärung allein darf auf keinem Fall ein Recht mit der sachenrechtlichen Kraft erworben oder begründet werden, denn sie widerspricht den numerus clausus des Sachenrechts. Dazu kommt, dass der Erblasser lediglich Im Erbrecht schriftlich geregelte Sache testamentarisch wirksam vefügen kann. Aber das KBGBkennt die Erbeinsetzung kaum. Daraus folgt, dass Universalvermächtnis sowie Spezialvermächtnis nur schuldrechtlich wirken müssen.

1980 국제물품매매계약에 관한 UN협약(CISG)의 해석과 적용

이진기(Jin-Ki Lee) 한국비교사법학회 2010 비교사법 Vol.17 No.2

CISG is a uniform law and at the same time a kind of codex, which must be recognised as belonging to a autonomous and independent legal order than the traditional nation produced law. A uniform methode of interpretation is indispensable in order to achieve and further the unification purpose of the Convention. The Convention strives to ensure a uniform interpretation and application through Art. 7 CISG. Uniformity can be only achieved by disallowing a homeward trend. Clear and unambiguous language is mostly regarded as a statute's primary source of meaning. But translation is special skill of its own. The interpretation of CISG follows the general methode of interpreting international treaties. Vienna Treaties Convention is widely regarded as embodying general principles of international law which can be used even by non-contraction nations. Art. 31-33 Treaties Convention provide a general framework of elements for interpretation - text, context, legislative history and purpose. Interpretation with respect to Conventions like CISG that tries to unify substantive law persues the uniform application of this instrument. Good faith in Art. 7 I CISG goes beyond the interpretation of the Convention alone; it is tied up with the performance of the contractual obligations. Good faith gives a court to build greater certainty to contractual parties, specially to party autonomy or freedom of parties. In order to understand and apply the unintended gap-filling provision of Art. 7 II CISG, it is essential to make clear distinction between the matters that are governed by the Convention and those which are not. The tool used to fill the gap in Convention is the analogous application of existing provisions. The methodical analysis concerning Art. 7 II CISG is theoretically relatively easy to achieve, but the use of general principles to solve controversies should also be kept in mind.

한정능력자의 대리능력과 무권대리

이진기(Jin-Ki Lee) 한국비교사법학회 2010 비교사법 Vol.17 No.4

Der Inhalt deises Aufsatzes ist zusammenzufassen wie folgt: 1. §117 KBGB findet seine Anwendung auf die Vollmacht; ein beschränkter Geschäftsfähiger kann die gesetzliche Vertretungsmacht nicht erwerben. 2. Wer ohne Vertretungsmacht als Vertreter einen Vertrag abgeschlossen hat, ist, sofern er nicht seine Vertretungsmacht beweist oder die Genehmigung des Vertretenen nicht erfolgt, hat nach Wahl des anderen Teils zur Erfüllung oder zum Schadensersatz verpflichtet; Erfüllung- und Schadensersatzhaftung bilden das Wahlschuldverhältnis im Sinne des §380 KBGB. 3. Ein beschränkter Geschäftsfähiger, der ohne Vertretungsmacht als Vertreter einen Vertrag abgeschlossen hat, hat keine Haftung für den Mangel der Vertretungsmacht zu tragen, so nach §135 Abs.2 KBGB. Ein Minderjähriger wird aber dann entlastet, falls er delikshaftungsunfähig ist, auch wenn er ohne Vertretungsmacht im Namen eines anderen einen Vertrag abgeschlossen und damit eine rechtswidrige Hadlung begangen hat: dagegen kann sich sein gesetzlicher Vertreter nicht davon befreien. Daraus entsteht ein Widerspruch mit der Deliktshaftung aus §§733,755 und 750 KBGB entstehen. Um dieses nicht hamonisierte Ergebnis zu vermeiden, ist dringend gesetzgeberisch empholen, die Zustimmung des gesetzlichen Vertreters als die Voraussetzung für die Handlung aufgrund der Vollmacht einzuführen,

개정민법 규정으로 본 성년후견제도의 입법적 검토와 비판

이진기(Lee, Jin-Ki) 한국가족법학회 2012 가족법연구 Vol.26 No.2

The provisions that are put into effect with the Amendment of the Korean Civil Code on February 18, 2011 seem unfit at the time of legislative process due to their struggle to protect the possibility for self-determination of disabled about their personal affairs. As a result, the legislation leads the Amendment into a conundrum. For the legal interpretation, the wording of each provision possesses the primary authority, followed by the system and construction of the provisions. The wording in Amendment, however, fails to fully disclose the legislative purposes. Furthermore, the legislators' intent is not principally considered. The Amendment, due to its ambiguity, incompleteness, complexity, and lack of harmony, is difficult to decipher and it is thus a challenge to prognosticate the results of its application. In conclusion, the Amendment can be described from the view of whole system of Korean Civil Code as a failed and unsuccessful legislation that should be revised in the near future.

대리제도와 당사자에 관한 대법원 기본판결

이진기(Jin Ki LEE) 한국비교사법학회 2013 비교사법 Vol.20 No.4

지도적인 基本判決(leading case, model case)은 표지석이 되는 법원의 판결로서 중요한 새로운 법원칙 또는 법률개념을 확립하거나 이밖에 실정법의 해석을 본질적으로 변경하는 先例를 말한다. 제정법만이 법원이 되는 시민법국가에서도 법이론과 재판실무는 해석론 못지않은 비중을 가지며, 대법원이 법령의 해석과 적용의 최고법원이므로 그의 판결은 하급법원에 대하여 사실상 구속효를 가진다. 그러므로 기본판결은 대법원 판결 중에서 선정되어야 한다. 기본판결을 선정하는 기준을 보면: (1) 이해가 쉽고, 특정 법률제도(이 글에서는 "대리")를 통섭적으로 개관할 수 있는 판결인가? (2) 대리의 원칙이 될 수 있는 논리적이고 일관성 있는 기본이론을 내용으로 하는가? (3) 대리와 그의 하부제도(유권대리, 무권대리, 표현대리 등)의 상호관계의 이해에 기여하는가? (4) 마지막으로 기본판결로 선정된 판결이 별 다른 어려움 없이 법학교육의 현장에 이식ㆍ사용될 수 있는가? 이를 위하여 선정된 판결이 법이론적 다툼으로부터 자유로운 그러한 성질의 판결이어야 한다. 이 글에서는 대판 1983.12.13., 83다카1489 (전원합의체판결)과 대판 1995.09.29., 94다 4912를 대리제도에 관한 기본판결로 고르고, 대법원판결례를 근거로 하여 이의 법리와 논점을 해설한다. 다만 이글은 특정판결의 평석이 아니라 기본판결의 해석과 교육적 적용을 논의의 주제로 하므로 연구논문의 일반형식을 따르지 아니한다. In line in any given Jurisdiction is the constitution and under it the laws passed bay the legislature. In spite of all these enactments, there are still many situations unccounted for that must subject to the interpretation of law. The development of the decisions is left to the court, especially to the Supreme Court of Justice. Even though one decision cannot be the precedent for subsequent ones in the most civil law countries, one decision of the Supreme Court enjoys as a fact the highest authority based on art.8 of Civil Procedure Act. A representative decision of the Supreme Court named as "leading case" can be adapted not only in legal practice but also for the purpose of legal education. The criteria are as follow: 1. Is a decision proper and adequate enough to show students the frame and contents of a certain legal institution? 2. Does it contain a rational and consistent basic theory? 3. Does it contribute to understand the relationship between a legal institution and an another one? 4. Is it easy to understand? 5. Is it free from theoretical contradiction? 6. can it function as a good material for educational purpose?

최신판례분석 : 부합과 양도담보권의 효력 - 대법원 2016. 4. 28. 선고 2012다19659 판결 -

이진기 ( Lee Jin Ki ) 법조협회 2016 법조 Vol.65 No.7

In Korean Civil Law a security on movable property by means of transfer comes under the category of “real right granted by way of security.” However, the well-established decisions made by the Korean Supreme Court shows a consistent disapproval of good faith acquisition of security by means of transfer because constititum possessorium alone can never satisfy its condition. The situation fares worse when through attachment a movable property loses its characteristic as a separate entity and becomes part of another main entity, such as a building or a ship, which is already offered as a security by means of transfer. With regards to this case, another matter comes into question; who among the pledger who put down his possession, the creditor, or the holder of a real right granted by way of security acquire ownership of the attached entity? Korean Supreme Court Decision 2016.4.28., 2012DA19659 sat in judgment on this case in favor of the pledger for reasons that material benefit should be vested in him. The person who lost his property should claim the restitution based on unjust enrichment against the pledger, not the creditor. But as the creditor also appears externally as the owner of the security, the owner of the attached entity may argue that he is the person who should restitute the loss because he is riding a wave of the enrichment. Korean Supreme Court had to consider this aspect.

상속의 이념과 방향

이진기(LEE Jin Ki) 한국비교사법학회 2019 비교사법 Vol.26 No.1

상속은 어느 누구도 비켜나지 못하는 문화현상(kuturelles Phänomen)이다. 상속법은 가족심리적 문제의 거울이며 동시에 사회현실의 거울이다, 현행민법 상속편은 민법개정의 풍파에서 비켜서서 제정민법의 원형을 거의 그대로 유지하는 법역이다. 상속의 본질과 관련하여 제기되는 핵심적인 의문은 1. 상속을 법률제도로 인정할 것인가, 그리고 인정한다면 그 근거는 무엇인가의 문제, 즉 상속의 근거와 2. 이때 누구에게 상속재산을 귀속할 것인가, 즉 상속의 귀속주체의 확정으로 요약된다. 2.는 1.을 전제로 하는 서로 차원을 달리하는 문제이다. 상속은 1. 재산소유자가 의도하여 남겼거나 특별한 의도 없이 쓰다가 남기거나 장래에 대한 불안 속에서 미처 쓰지 못한 殘餘[剩餘]財産, 즉 遺産의 處理를 본질로 한다, 다음으로 상속은 2. 권리자가 가졌던, 소유권을 비롯한 재산권의 내용을 구성하는 權能 자체 또는 그의 延長을 본질로 한다. 여기에서 유언은 재산소유자의 意思의 結果物이며, 유언이 없으면 그의 부존재가 바로 법률규정[법정상속]을 따르는 피상속인의 의사를 의제한다. 상속법의 개정에서도 현행 상속법의 원칙으로 이루는 사적 상속권, 가족상속, 유언자유와 재산의 당연 포괄승계는 고수되어야 한다. 그리고 상속환경의 변화 와 상속결과와 부양의 기존정신의 일치화가 이루어져야 하고, 이와 함께 특히 약자보호, 통일의 준비. 그리고 세계 속의 상속법의 이념이 실현되어야 한다.