“포스트코로나 시대에 대응한 과감한 패러다임의 전환이 필요합니다” : 이인영 더불어민주당 국회의원, 전 원내대표

이인영,이강식 국토연구원 2020 국토 : planning and policy Vol.464 No.-

한국인 일본어 학습자의 오용분석 : 文脈指示語 「その,あの」の誤用を 中心にして 문맥지시어 「その(그),あの(저)」의 오용을 중심으로

이인영 한국외국어대학교 외국어교육연구소 1996 외국어교육연구 Vol.- No.10

김수영 시와 한반도의 통일

이인영 한남대학교 한남어문학회 2023 한남어문학 Vol.44 No.-

양도소득세의 개선방안에 관한 연구

이인영 경영행정대학원 1997 최고경영자과정 논문집 Vol.7 No.-

被疑者保釋制度의 問題點과 改善方案에 관한 考察

이인영 한림대학교 법학연구소 2001 한림법학 FORUM Vol.10 No.-

The Criminal Procedure is given two tasks;one is the necessities of discovering the substantial truth including arrest and punishment of criminals, protechtion of sufferers and maintenance of public order. The other is the requirement for the security of human rights, which protected the human rights of the suspected and the accused from being punished with committing no crime by the potential misjudgement of human being who was not god. There occur a conflict between the two tasks throughout the whole area in the criminal procedure. A primary purpose of bail can be said to implement the ideology of embodiment of justice and to protect human rights in criminal justice system. A major justification of bail was that the bail procedure can be employed in courts as a way to avoid the probable confinement of innocent persons, who are falsely accused. Another justification of bail was that the historical legal doctrine. Presumption of Innocent, would not be appropriately implemented in judicial processing without a bail provision. However the results of empirical analysis showed that the bail provision of person before indictment in Korea has been implemented in a limited scope, and that the provision has been improperly applied in several ways. This study recommends that more efforts should be given to correct the problem on the implementation and application of bail provision of a person before indictment in Criminal Procedure Law. This Study suggests that it is necessary to enlarge the scope of application of bail. Bail shall be available even for the suspects, if it is certain that they will be appear at courts on the appointed date. It is necessary to develop alternative methods-Release on personal recognizance, Conditional release, Station house Citaion Release-for the allowance of bail in addition to the traditional method-Monetary bail. It is necessary to provide the judge with detailed guides, which can be adopted when the judge decide the amount of the bail bond. This Study suggests that the amount of the bail bond shall be considered as a way for poor defendants to prepare the bail money.

『생명윤리 및 안전에 관한 법률』상의 처벌규정과 규제논거를 중심으로

이인영 연세법학회 2005 연세법학 Vol.11 No.1

醫療分業과 信賴의 原則

이인영 연세법학회 1999 연세법학 Vol.6 No.1

뇌신경윤리위원회의 설치에 관한 제언

이인영 미래의료인문사회과학회 2018 FUTURE MEDICINE & HUMANITIES Vol.1 No.2

뇌신경과학의 발달로 인해 기술적 수단을 동원해 뇌에 직접적으로 개입하는 과정을 찾거나 직접 이러한 구현을 해보는 뇌연구가 지속적으로 빠른 속도로 증가하고 있다. 이에 따라 야기되는 법적, 윤리적 이슈들도 빠른 속도로 늘어나고 있으며, 안전에 관한 이슈도 무시할 수 없는 이슈 중의 하나이다. 이러한 윤리적 이슈에 대해 적절하게 대응하는 기구가 뇌신경윤리위원회이다. 뇌신경윤리위원회의 기본 기능은 자문・심의기능으로 볼 수 있다. 뇌신경윤리위원회는 구성, 절차 및 의사결정에 있어서 정치적・제도적 영향과 관련 산업계의 영향으로부터 독립적이어야 하고, 뇌과학 전문가, 신경윤리 전문가 뿐 아니라 공익, 시민사회단체의 대표들도 포함해 널리 의견을 수렴할 수 있는 구조를 가진 위원회이어야 한다. 개정법률안의 뇌신경윤리위원회은 장관소송의 위원회로서의 위원 구성에서 위원장은 위원 중에서 호선하는 것이 적절하다고 본다. 특히 뇌신경윤리위원회 위원들을 위촉하는 경우 정부의 정책결정에 대해 중립적으로 정책방안에 대해서 비판적 자세를 가질 수 있는 민간계 위원의 구성비율을 높여야 할 필요가 있다. 뇌신경윤리위원회의 업무사항으로 뇌신경윤리에 관한 기본정책을 수립하는 사항과 뇌신경윤리 기본정책에 관한 공공의 인식제고 및 대국민 공감대 형성에 관한 사항을 포함하는 역할을 하여야 한다. 뇌신경윤리위원회의 효율적 운영을 위해서 분야별 전문위원회를 둘 수 있다는 규정이 필요하다. 따라서 뇌신경윤리위원회의 업무, 기능과 관련하여 심의사항별 전문위원회를 설치 운영하는 것을 제안하며, 위원회 운영의 효율성을 위해서 전문위원회와 사무국 전담기구를 설치한다는 규정을 두고 이를 시행령에 위임하여 입법하는 것이 적절하다. The ‘Brain Research Promotion Act’ was legislated in 1998 in order to provide institutional strategies for promoting brain research to develop advanced industrial technologies for the 21st century and to improve national welfare. Since then, the Brain Research Promotion Act has been revised several times, but there have been no regulations on organizations or procedures to address the social and ethical issues according to the development of advanced brain science. In 2017, the government and members of the National Assembly respectively announced a revision bill on the Brain Research Promotion Act. The main contents suggest the establishment of a Brain Neuroethics Committee to the Brain Research Promotion Act. According to the revision bill, the main task of the Neuroethics Committee is to conduct consultation and deliberation on the matters related to the convergence of brain research with other fields of science and technology and the ethical, social, and legal issues that arise when it is utilized. The safety and ethical issues arising from the development of brain science technology may be a sensitive issue with disagreements and conflicts between researchers, ordinary citizens, and social groups. Unlike the rapidly accelerating pace of advanced brain research, the process of publicizing, consulting, and inspecting ethical and safety issues is not properly implemented, which may result in a high possibility of wasteful arguments and conflicts related to brain science research. Expectations and concerns often coexist in the issues posed by the development of brain science. Therefore, a careful and calm response is required for the development of brain science and its implications. One of the measures for such response is establishing a Neuroethics Committee. The Neuroethics Committee has the function of collecting, reviewing, analyzing, advising, and recommending information on the issues with social significance that brain science technology can bring. In this sense, the Neuroethics Committee can serve as an institutional measure that implements the function of counsel and advice for the ethical practice of brain science research by pursuing integrated activities of ethicists and brain scientists as well as presenting public-level recommendations or agreements on the issues of neuroethics.

한일양국어 대조의 기초적 연구(1)

이인영 한국외국어대학교 언어연구소 2005 언어와 언어학 Vol.0 No.35

When in need of setting a research target on both the Korean and the Japanese languages, two major linguistic disciplines the historical comparative linguistics and the contrastive linguistics are assumably available. However, genetic affiliation between Korean and Japanese has not yet been fully proved; traditional methodology of the historical linguistics, thus, has not been so successful as to deal with the above two languages in genetic perspectives. Meanwhile, contrastive linguistics has had its own effect on such research as above, with its theoretical foundations based on the descriptive linguistics of the structuralism. It has served practical foreign language education, and has played great roles in developing teaching methods and materials for practical uses. However, argument over contrastive linguistics seems to be current in various levels even these days; due to the fact that linguistic theories are presumably so fluid and even in chaotic status that we would find difficulties in finding reliable theories that are suitable for contrastive research. Thus, output often ends up with a mere description of similarities and/or differences among the target languages. Considering the current situation as stated above, the present paper aims not only to overview the targets and units of the contrastive research, but also to describe the fundamental operations that are needed for the contrastive research in the Korean and the Japanese languages.

비주거용 집합건물 최초 관리단집회 소집 절차에 관한 연구

이인영,한자선,권대중 한국집합건물법학회 2019 집합건물법학 Vol.31 No.-

As the housing culture has changed and apartment houses have become common, non-residential real estate has also become larger. In this way, the number of cases of disputes increases along with the expansion of the type of condominium buildings, and the need for systematic and efficient management is raised. Generally if construction is completed after receiving the sale through the seller The registration process for ownership transfer is in progress, If the schedule requirements are met A management group consisting of all the classifications of owners will be established. A management team through the meeting of the management team through the act of selecting a manager and setting a contract The practice of full-scale management begins. related to the procedure for convening an initial management meeting. However, in this process, different interests between the seller and the consumer are preventing the management assembly from being held. Therefore, the initial management group meeting shall be convened in accordance with the due process, so that the management of the Condominium Building shall be transparent with the exercise of the rightful rights of the sorting owners. Therefore, this study proposes improvement measures for problems arising from current laws, such as preventing gaps in the management of Condominium Buildings by analyzing problems related to the procedure for convening an initial management group. 주거문화의 변화로 공동주택이 일반화된 것처럼 비주거용 부동산의 경우도 대형화되고 있다. 이처럼 집합건물의 형태가 확대됨에 따라 분쟁사례도 함께 증가하면서 체계적이고 효율적인 관리에 대한 필요성이 제기되고 있다. 일반적으로 분양자를 통해 분양을 받게 된 후 준공이 이루어지면 소유권 이전 등기 절차가 진행되고, 일정 요건이 충족되면 구분소유자 전원으로 구성된 관리단이 설립된다. 관리단은 관리단집회 소집을 통해 관리인 선임 및 규약 설정 등의 행위를 통해 본격적인 관리 행위가 시작된다. 하지만, 이 과정에서 분양자와 수분양자간 첨예한 이해관계속에 최초 관리단집회를 개최하는데 있어 분쟁이 발생한다. 이에 적법한 절차에 따라 최초 관리단집회가 소집되어 구분소유자들의 정당한 권리 행사와 함께 집합건물 관리가 투명하게 이루어져야 한다. 따라서 본 연구는 최초 관리단집회 소집 절차와 관련된 문제점들을 분석함으로써 집합건물 관리의 공백을 방지하는 등 현행 법률에서 나타나는 문제점에 대한 개선방안을 제안하고자 한다.