RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 음성지원유무
        • 원문제공처
          펼치기
        • 등재정보
          펼치기
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
          펼치기
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • 美·蘇의 軍政과 對韓半島 統一政策

        李宇榮 경북대학교 사회과학대학 1983 社會科學 Vol.2 No.-

        The objective of this thesis is to study the policies of the United States and the Soviet Union with regard to their unification policies toward Korea during the three years of their occupation period on the Korean peninsula immediately following the end of the Pacific War in 1945. After a careful and thorough evaluation of their policies, the following conclusions were found: 1. It was the United States which suggested the trusteeship for Korea during the World War Ⅱ. It was finalized at Moscow Conference in December, 1945. However, the trusteeship plan turned out to be a failure of the American policy as the most of Korean sopposed the plan. The United States should have been able to persuade, if not convince, the leaders of the South Korea on the merits of the trusteeship plan, which Washington failed to do. Furthermore, inconsistence of the American policy as evidenced by its alteration of the original plan after the majority of the Koreans rejected the trusteeship plan also contributed to the failure of the American policy in Korea. 2. The Soviet Union participated actively on Korean problem since the end of the World War Ⅱ in Europe, particularly during the Yalta and Potsdam Conferences of Allied Powers. Moscow attempted to communize the entire peninsula from the outset of its occupation of North Korea in 1945. The Soviet Union tried to gather the support of Koreans for its scheme by insisting, in forming the Provisional government for Korea, on consulting only with "democratic"-meaning communist-parties and social groups. And its decision to shorten the period of trusteeship to five years instead of up to ten years as proposed by the United states, was to hasten the communization of entire peninsula. Also, Moscow's insistence on discussing the political affairs prior to the solution of the economic matters reflects the basic Soviet strategy of comminization of entire Korea. The Soviet Union's proposal at the United Nations that the withdrawal of foreign troops from Korea should precede the formation of a unified government also reflects Moscow's scheme of communizing Korea militarily. 3. In conclusion, the clash of national interests of both the United States and the Soviet Union on the Korean question resulted in the failure of the peninsula to he reunified after the liberation of Korea from the Japanese domination in 1945. The initial decision of the United States to partition the Korean peninsula along the 38th parallel was another reason, perhaps the most crucial reason, for the perpetuated division of Korea in the first place. Along with these, the lack of consensus among the political leaders of Korea on the formula for reunifying the peninsula also contributed toward the failure of the country to be reunited.

      • 亞太地域의 軍事·安保環境의 推移

        李宇榮 경북대학교 환태평양연구소 1988 環太平洋硏究 Vol.1 No.-

        The inportance of countries of Pacific area which will lead 21 century is newly emerging due to the increase of national income, the trade of goods. and the transfer of science and technology etx., which owe much to the population specific gravity, enormous resources, and industrialization. Especially, in the late of 1984, the second-term policy report or speech etc., by R. Reagan, the presdent of the United States said that the trade quantity with Pacific area began to exceed from 1982 in comparision with. Atlantic Europe countries and have declared the commencement of performance toward Pacific period on the basis of reversal phenomenon of trade quantity. new leading class of the Soviet Union is making a challenge to Pacific Rim area with triple objects, that is, 1) geographical expansion and increase of influence power, 2) approach of up-to-date techniques, 3) resources development and labor population increase in Siberia and Maritime Territory and so on, and the United states makes stress on control of the growth of the Soviet military power as a security interests. But this area is lacking in comprehensive security device and exposing potential fragility against outside military powers on aggressions without multilateral security device being able to cope with them. Just in this context, since now the problems of the Korean penninsula have international issues including Pacific Rim. visualizing active, wide, local security deivce, they have not to be limited only between the parties, South and North Korea, and they have to be studied, estimated and discussed by connecting with comprehensive international security problem. By doing so, we will preserve splendid achievements of Korea and other democratic countries of pacific Rim area and prevent them from war.

      • 韓末日本人 居留地의 設定과 그 役割

        李宇榮 慶北大學校 1969 論文集 Vol.13 No.-

        The Foreign Settlement of Western Powers in Asia was established for the purpose of free trade and settling their citizens, enjoying the extra-territoriality. The beginning of Foreign Settlement in Asia was made in China by Western Powers and it was overlapped by the invasion into the Chinese sovereignty. The Japanese Settlement in Korea was established in Pusan, Wonsan, Inchon, Masan, Kunsan and Chinnampo during Lee-dynasty, pretending to promote the good-neighbour-hood through he Korea-Japan relation, especially diplomatic contacts and commercial trade. However, a treaty-port was erected in Pusan according to Kwang-Wha Island Theaty by which Korea was turned into open-country and openport; subsequently Pusan Settlement was set up by Pusan Settlement Menorandum. In this article, I have attempted to examine the invasive role of Japanese Settlement in Korea. Then I have found that the roles of Japanese Settlement in Korea are two. One is the economic function from the open-country to Chino-Japanese war and the other is the military strategical function from the Chino-Japanese war to the Russo-Japanese war. In addition to this, I have compared the character of the Japanese Settlement in Korea with the China's. Here I have also found that the character of the Japanese Settlement in Korea is the mixed form of Leased Territory and Fereign Settlement in China. Continually, I will study how Japanese Settlement in Korea was linked with the marine transportation of Korea during Lee-dynasty.

      • 마르크스에 있어 아시아적 생산양식과 제 3세계

        李宇榮,李炳熙 慶北大學校 1985 論文集 Vol.39 No.-

        The Asiatic Mode of Production is one of the most controversial concepts in the history of Marxism and brings about a serious and intractable problem in the general marxist theory. Marx says that because there is no private property within Aisiatic Mode of Production, the original Asian commune suffers fewer internal cntradictions than elsewhere and as not so much tansformed as subjugated to a 'higher unity'-the-State-which in this environ ment is born chiefly out of the need to meet the basic requirements of drainage and irrigation networks, dams, and other major hydraulic engineering works dictated by local geography and climate, but soon takes on more or less despotic forms, transforming its original functional powers into political domination and exploitation. There are three basic features in Marx's coneption of Asiatic Society. First, there is no private ownership of land. Second, the base is a system of village communes, each one made self-sufficent through a close combination of agriculture and cottage crafts. Third, the central power plays a commanding role. The fact that in Oriental Society the relations of production are determined more by the state than the economics of the mode of production is quite contradictory to the general theory of Marx. It also sometimes cantradicts the more sweeping and general claims made on behalf of Marxism as a universal philosophy of history. Marx's theory of Asiatic Mode of Production has its own difficulties in the whole context of his theory but it sheds on intriguing light on some of Marx'g best insights in historical development of the third World: collectivism bureaucracy, totalitarianism, and may help to correct some of the models of modernization.

      • KCI우수등재

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼