RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재후보

        인용분석에 의한 행정학분야 학술지의 특성

        윤석경(Suk-Kyeong Yoon) 한국공공관리학회 2007 한국공공관리학보 Vol.21 No.3

        학술지는 연구결과를 발표하고 공유할 수 있는 정보전달과 지식을 축적할 수 있는 수단으로서 매우 중요한 가치를 지니고 있다. 본 연구는 행정학분야 학술지 8종을 대상으로 하여 논문의 특성, 인용의 특성, 지식이전속도, 학술지영향력 지표 값을 산출하여 분석한 것으로 그 결과는 다음과 같이 요약할 수 있다. 행정학분야 학술지의 논문들에서는 점차적으로 공동연구 비율이 증가하고는 있으나, 아직 단독연구의 비중이 높아 학제적 공동연구의 확대를 도모할 수 있는 제도적 장치가 필요한 것으로 나타났다. 논문 1편 당 인용 수에 있어서는 자연과학 분야 학술지 논문들에 비해 많은 편이었으며, 인용문헌의 원천에 있어서는 대부분의 학술지에서 국내 자료보다는 국외 자료의 인용비율과 단행본에 대한 인용비율이 높았다. 이와 함께 저자 자신의 논문을 인용하는 개인 자기인용율과 자기학술지를 인용하는 학술지 자기인용율은 낮은 편으로, 연구주제의 후속연구 또는 1회성 저작형태가 많으며, 연구주제의 다양성에 비해 연구자들의 연구수요를 자기학술지에서 충족시켜주지 못함에 따라 타학술지를 많이 인용한 것으로 보인다. 인용집중률에 있어서는 일부 국내외 저명 학술지에 대해 인용이 집중되는 쏠림현상이 있었으며, ?한국행정학보?에 대한 인용집중률이 다른 국내외 학술지에 비해 높았다. 또한 즉시성지수, 인용절정기, 인용반감기를 통해 분석된 지식이전속도도 빠른것으로 분석되고 있어 행정학분야의 환경변화가 빠른 것으로 추정되고 있으며, ?한국행정학보?를 제외한 다른 학술지들의 영향력은 낮은 것으로 나타났다. 현재 국내외적으로 학술지 평가 및 연구자 평가를 위해 다양한 방법들이 활용되고 있다는 점을 고려해 볼 때 본 연구에서 활용된 체계적이고 객관적인 평가기법으로서의 인용 분석과 함께 다른 질적 평가기법을 적용한다면, 학술지 평가 및 연구자 평가에 있어 많은 도움이 될 수 있을 것이다. Academic journals have an important value as a venue to deliver information and accumulate knowledge by presenting and sharing research results. This study analyzes the characteristics of journals, the purpose of citations, the speed of knowledge transfers, and the index of the journal's influence on eight journals in Public Administration. The results are as follows: The amount of papers in public administration journals show that the rate of co-research has gradually increased, but the rate of independent research is still high. This results present that systematic support must be needed for interdisciplinary research. The number of citations per paper is higher than ones of natural science journals, but most citations of public administration journals are usually from international journals rather than domestic journals. Also, the rate of citations from books is higher than that of journals. Meanwhile, the rate of citations of writer's own papers and ones of journals that he or she belongs to are low. This means that there are some academic papers just for following up research or papers presented only once. Although there are many various research topics, researchers use citations from other journals rather than the ones that they belong to because they cannot satisfy their own research demands. And, there is a tendency that researchers cite only from the famous international or domestic journals. They quote from the Korean Public Administration Review much more often than that of other international or domestic journals. Also, the results show that the speed of knowledge transfer is fast considering index of immediacy, period of citation peak, and period of citation, which means that the research environment of political science is fast. The results also show the influence of other journals, except for the Korean Public Administration Review, is low. Currently, there are various methods to analyze academic journals and evaluate researchers domestically and internationally but it will be helpful if more systematic and objective evaluation methods used in research, as well as other quality evaluation methods, are considered to evaluate both academic journals and researchers.

      • KCI등재

        대학생들의 헌혈의도에 관한 집단 간 비교 분석: 성별과 헌혈경험을 중심으로

        윤석경(Suk-Kyeong Yoon) 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 2020 사회과학연구 Vol.31 No.2

        This study examined the impacts of university students’ attitudes toward blood donation, moral norm, and self-efficacy on their blood donation intention empirically by applying the theory of planned behavior. For this investigation, this research divided the university students into two groups based on their gender and experience of blood donation. According to the analysis, regardless of the comparison groups, the self-efficacy, moral norm, and attitudes toward blood donation were statistically significant on the blood donation intention. Specifically, according to the results of multi-group analysis based on gender, a path between self-efficacy and blood donation intention was statistically significant. On the other hand, two other paths related to the attitude toward blood donation and moral norm do not account for blood donation intention. In addition, when comparing two groups based on experience of blood donation, the self-efficacy was statistically significant on blood donation intention. On the other hand, the attitudes toward blood donation and the moral norm were not statistically significant. These findings suggest two implications. First, improving self-efficacy, strengthening the sense of moral norm, and promoting a positive attitude toward blood donation should be emphasized to develop blood donation education and promotion programs. Second, multi-group analysis indicated that improving self-efficacy should be focused more on female or non-donors than male or donors when developing blood education and promotion programs.

      • KCI등재

        ‘행정’의 일상개념 분석 논리와 분석

        권정만(Jeong-Man Kwon),윤석경(Suk-Kyeong Yoon) 충남대학교 사회과학연구소 2014 사회과학연구 Vol.25 No.1

        This research looks at survey results conducted with Undergraduate students in order to find out how the concept of “HaengJeong (meaning Administration in Korean)” is accepted in a daily basis. The survey is analysed with the methods of ordinary concept analysis and actual proof analysis. A preliminary research survey was conducted in November, 2011 targeting students attending three universities located in Daejeon Metropolitan City and Choongcheongnam-do Province. Upon the collection of the distributed survey, survey configuration was evaluated and developed into a more sophisticated one. Of the 360 copies of upgraded version of survey distributed to 6 universities across the nation, 60 copies each, over the period of time, May to July, 2012, 306 copies were collected, and 282 copies of those collected were analysed. With the survey, the researcher obtained three results: a. there is a difference between HaengJeong and Administration. b. the concept of HaengJeong includes a range of concepts, even vague ones. c. the criteria of distinguishing HaengJeong starts from the separation-of-power awareness, and the awareness on HaengJeong often turns out to be negative and is strongly influenced by personal experience and knowledge in administration. The purpose of the research, unlike the existing attempts to conceptualize administration as an effort to answer the question of “What is Administration,” is to approach to the most basic and fundamental logic and analyse it.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼