RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재

        비선택적 결속과 다중전치 의문사구조

        윤만근 대한언어학회 1999 언어학 Vol.7 No.3

        Man-Kun Yoon. 1999. Unselective Binding and Multiple Wh-Fronting Construction. linguistics 7-3, 1-26. The first aim of this paper is to argue that any event in our world necessarily co-occur with four adverbials which can turn into four different wh-adjuncts; when, where, why and how. This paper further argues that this phenomenon is language universal. Second aim is that unselective binding applies only to wh-NPs, not wh-adjuncts, and hence covert raising is necessary for the checking of wh-adjuncts. Although wh-NPs can be interpreted in situ by unselective binding, case checking of wh-NPs requires covert or overt riasing of them. Third aim is that nominative wh-NPs can be checked by C and accusative wh-NPs by C^omax. Detailed explanations about the C^omax are provided in section 5 below. (Chongju University)

      • 母音標記의 類型에 關한 考察

        尹萬根 淸州大學校 1983 論文集 Vol.16 No.1

        First, the phonological systems and articulatory places of vowels have been for the most part described by the abstract Cardinal Vowel Systems of Daniel Jones. However, the articulatory places of vowels, which were identified by X-rays and. frequencies of formants are drastically different from those of Cardinal Vowel Systems. It is quite natural that such differences are noticed, because the speech organ of human beings is a semi-circled tube rather than a abstract square. Secondly, the feature dichotomy of generative phonology has provided good solutions in the description of vowels, but as diagram(16) shows, such binary system has lost its balance, because the number of vowels in [+back] and [-back] is not equal. Hence, my suggestion is that the mid-central vowels /i/, /??/ and /a/ should be assigned feature [neutral] so that the rest of vowels be arranged in a balanced system. Thirdly, in Korean vowel phonology, /으/ and /어/ described /i/ and /??/ respectively, but according to the frequencies of formants, it has been proved that such description is not valid: /으/ and /어/ should be described as /?/ and /?/ respectively. In spite of the such unreasonable points, if one wants to follow the system, one has to admit that the system ignores the correct identification of acticulatory points in order to organize a well-balanced phonological system. Finally, the articulatory place of /u/ in the frequency chart of formant shows that /u/ is located near the mid high area rather than in the back high area, and the real articulatory place of the /u/ is changeable according to the following phonological environment as was shown in diagram(26).

      • Vicarious Functions of &P : The Problems of &P and its Solutions

        윤만근 청주대학교 국제문제연구원 1999 國際文化硏究 Vol.17 No.-

        As was mentioned in the above, every syntactic unit is being described in a binary blanching mode except the structures conjoined by "and" However, Zoerner (1995) made an attempt to describe it in a binary branching mode and we have to accept his notion of & P even though there are some problematic points in his argument It leads me to believe that both the argument that presented in (15) which has multiple NPs conjoined by "and" and the multiple subject construction (16) presented by Chomsky (1994; 41-42) can capture a generalization in that they can maintain "binary branching system" Further, (15) does not violate the Spec-Head Agreement condition in terms of a m-command structure and a logical point of view In these two points, (15) shows strong explanatory power than that of a traditional diagram (14a,b) The second point I have made is that the function of "and" which shows In surface structures is not the true function of It, but Its real function Is vicarious one. "and" takees over oyer the functions of V, N, Adj, Ady, P, T, C, etc according to different syntactic contexts which were demonstrated In the examples (21)-(26) The third argument that I presented here is that in the multiple subject object constructions and further the compound noun phrases conjoined by "and", each element should move in an independent way, even though these elements are contained in one XP If they are moved in one unit as a DP or a NP, then the checking head may be change form T to D or N as shown in (18b) above. Further (18b) may violate the ECP and an M-Command checking configuration

      • A Sociolinguistic Approach in EFL : A Focus on Communicative Competence 意思轉達能力에 초점을 둔

        YOON, Man Kun 淸州大學校 1981 論文集 Vol.14 No.1

        이 글은 外國語敎育에 있어서 社會言語學的 規則과 言語學約 規則에 同一한 重要性을 부여하고서 다루어져야 하며, 아니면 오히려 Communicative-Competence의 開發을 위해서는 社會言語學的 規則에 더 큰 比重을 부여해야 한다고 强調했다. 왜냐하면 어린이들이 母國語를 習得할 때 公式的인 形式的인 表現보다 口話나 非言語的表現(nonverbal expressions)을 훨씬 먼저 배우기 때문이다. 그러므로 Chomsky의 Competence機念이 言語의 社會的인 뜻을 形式締인 모두 포함시킬 수 있도록 擴大되어야 하고, 나아가 言語學習者가 어떤 특수한 경우에 처했을 때, 여러가지 表現中, 그 경우에 가장 적합한 表現을 選擇하여, 다양한 사회환경에 맞추어 言語를 구사할 수 있는 能力도 포함시켜야 할 것이다. 이와같은 社會言語學的 見地에서 본다면, 言語學習者는 自身의 母國語와 外國語를 두고, 社會言語學的 對照分析을 通해 語學的 轉移(transfer)는 물론 社倉言語學的 轉移를 하게 된다는 假設을 세울 수 있게 된다. 그렇다면 外國語敎育에서 最適의 效果를 達成할 수 있도록 아래와 같은 分析이 先行되어야 한다고 본다. 1. 一般社會言語學的 規則과 非言語的表現(non-verbal expressions) 및 cliches 等等에 對한 對照分析 2. 學習하는 外國語의 形式的, 非形式的表現, 文語體, 口話體 및 俗語등의 對照分析 3. 學習하는 外國語發音에 있어서 標準, 非標準 및 速音(blending or liaison)이 강한 표현과 약한 표현과의 對照分析 4. 以上 例示한 資料들이 敎材開發에 반드시 적용되어야 함.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼