운반체를 함침시킨 액막에 의한 아미노산의 이동

우인성,강안수 한국화학공학회 1988 Korean Chemical Engineering Research(HWAHAK KONGHA Vol.26 No.4

운반체로 Aliquat 336을 다공성 고체지지막에 합침시킨 액막을 이용하여 아미노산과 첨가전해질의 역방향이동계에서 아미노산의 이동속도에 대한 모델을 세워 분석하였다. 정상상태의 아미노산의 이동속도 및 농도분포를 Nernst-Planck식을 이용하여 유도하였고 이동속도에 영향을 주는 확산전위계수(os-mo-electric coefficient)를 정의하였다. 실험결과 막전위가 커질수록 아미노산의 이동속도는 감소하였고 이론식에시 정의된 확산전위계수는 아미노산의 flux와 선형적 관계를 나타내었다. 첨가전해질의 종류에 따른 아미노산의 이동속도는 수화에너지의 크기와 반대경항을 나타내었고 아미노산도 같은 경향으로 Try>Tyr〉Hip의 순서로 감소하였다. The transport of amino acids through the immobilized liquid membrane containing Aliquat 336 as a carrier was analyzed by a theoretical model. The flux and concentration distribution of amino acids at steady-state were derived with Nernst-Planck equation in counter-transport system of amino acids and added electrolytes, and the osmo-electric coefficient which affect the flux to a large extent was defined. It was concluded that the flux of amino acids decreased with increasing membrane potentials and was linear with the osmo-electric coefficient. The transport rate of amino acids had the inverse relation with the magnitude of hydration energy. Also the transport rate according to the amino acids increased in the order: tryptophan > tyrosine > hippuric acid.

메칠, 에칠 알콜의 연소속도

우인성 (社)韓國火災 ·消防學會 1996 한국화재소방학회논문지 Vol.10 No.1

Burning rate of immobilized methyl and ethyl alcohols on ceramic balls was studied. Experiments were performed by burning methyl, ethyl alcohols immobilized on sands(particle size 0.35mm) and ceramic balls(particle size 1-5mm) to measure mass burning rate, height burning rate and combustion temperature. The longer time from ignition to extinguishment was resulted from the larger particle size of ceramic balls and the smaller size of ceramic balls exhibited the higher mass burning rate. Of alcohols tested the relative magnitude of facilitation of combustion was methyl > ethyl. Combustion temperature of alcohols, without regard to the types of alcohols, was not increased with smaller ceramic balls(up to 3mm of particle size). However, with larger ceramic balls, combustion temperatare of alcohols was increased by 40-50℃ and the highest combustion temperatare was obtained with sands(particle size 0.35mm).

의료 분쟁 사례

우인성 대한산부인과학회 2021 대한산부인과학회 학술대회 Vol.107 No.-

모래의 입경에 따른 알콜의 연소속도

우인성,강현춘 ( In Sung Woo,Hyun Choon Kang ) 한국화학공학회 1995 화학공학의이론과응용 Vol.1 No.2

방전 Plasma 화학반응을 이용한 유기용매 증기의 분해

우인성,S . Yamaguma ( In Sung Woo,Shigezo Yamaguma ) 한국화학공학회 1996 화학공학의이론과응용 Vol.2 No.1

형법 제37조 후단의 사후적 경합범에 관한 몇가지 쟁점 검토

우인성 대한변호사협회 2023 人權과 正義 : 大韓辯護士協會誌 Vol.- No.516

When a defendant commits multiple crimes and is tried in one proceeding by consolidating the cases of those crimes, he is sentenced according to the former part of the article 37(concurrent crimes). When he is tried on those crimes at different times in different proceedings and a judgement in one of those proceedings is finalized with an imprisonment without prison labor or a heavier punishment, he is sentenced on the other crimes according to the latter part of the article 37. The amount of the unlawfulness of the concurrent crimes shall be assessed samely whether the concurrent crimes is sentenced at the same time or at the different times, which means the punishment shall be the same irrelevant of the application of the former or the latter part of the article 37. But Supreme Court, when dealing with the punishment of the latter part of the article 37, decided that the court is not bound to the limit of the article 38, which is applied when the multiple crimes is dealt with in one proceeding(2006do8376). Supreme Court decided, when the judgement, which makes some of the multiple crimes subject to the latter part of the article 37, is a suspension of execution of sentence(article 62), the court cannot suspend the imposition of sentence on the crimes subject to the latter part of the article 37(2010do931). Supreme Court decided when one judgement(A) on a crime is finalized and the crime is dealt with according to the latter part of the article 37 by the other finalized judgement, the crimes committed before and after the judgement(A) cannot be concurrent crimes(2011do2351). Supreme Court decided the court cannot mitigate the punishment below the limit of the article 55(2017do14609 en banc). But the above decisions of Supreme Court cannot be agreed. With some exceptions, the defendant shall not be treated better or worse even when he is tried according to the latter part of the article 37(partial opposition to 2006do8376). Suspension of imposition of sentence shall be allowed when the judgement, which makes some of the multiple crimes subject to the latter part of the article 37, is a suspension of execution of sentence(article 62), because, if the court can exempt the punishment on a crime, it can be deduced that the court have the authority to impose the heavier punishment like the suspension of imposition of sentence(opposition to 2010do931). A judgement(A) on a crime is finalized and the crime is dealt with according to the latter part of the article 37 by the other finalized judgement, which is before the judgement(A) by time, the crimes committed before and after the judgement(A) can be concurrent crimes because the judgement(A) cannot function as a judgement which can block the constitution of the concurrent crimes(opposition to 2011do2351). Even the same word is used in different parts of Criminal Law, the meaning of that word can be interpreted differently by the context where the word is used(opposition to 2017do14609 en banc) 행위자가 수개의 범죄행위를 범하여 동시에 재판받게 될 경우 형법 제37조 전단의 경합범(동시적 경합범)으로 처벌된다. 그 수개의 범죄행위를 이시에 재판받아 그중 일부에 대하여 확정판결이 먼저 이루어질 경우 나머지 죄는 형법 제37조 후단의 경합범(사후적 경합범)으로 처벌받게 된다. 동시적 경합범과 사후적 경합범 모두 그 전체에 대한 불법 평가가 동일하여야 하므로, 동시에 재판받았을 경우에 관한 형법 제38조의 처단형의 범위 내에서 사후적 경합범의 처단형 범위도 결정되어야 할 것이다. 그러나 대법원 판례는 사후적 경합범으로 처벌받는 경우 형의 양정에 있어서, 동시적 경합범으로 처벌받는 경우의 처단형의 범위에 구속되지 않는다고 본다(2006도8376). 그리고 사후적 경합범으로 처리되게 하는 확정판결이 집행유예(징역형)일 경우 사후적 경합범에 대하여 선고유예가 불가하다고 본다(2010도931). 사후적 경합범으로 처리된 확정판결 전후의 범죄행위는 실체적 경합범이 성립하지 않는다고 본다(2011도2351). 그리고 사후적 경합범의 형의 감경 범위에 관하여 형법 제55조 제1항 제3호의 제약을 받는다고 본다(2017도14609 전합). 그러나 사후적 경합범으로 처벌받는 경우가 동시적 경합범으로 처벌받는 경우보다 원칙적으로 불리하거나 유리하여서는 아니된다는 점(2006도8376에 대한 일부 반론), 사후적 경합범으로 처리되게 하는 확정판결은 그 판결이 확정되지 아니하였다면 사후적 경합범과 병합되지 아니한 상태로 병행심리되어 동시에 선고될 수 있고(이 경우 다른 결격사유가 없다면 선고유예가 가능하다), 형의 면제가 가능하다면 그보다 무겁다고 볼 수 있는 선고유예도 가능하다고 보아야 한다는 점(2010도931에 대한 반론), 사후적 경합범으로 처리된 확정판결 전후의 범죄행위는 실체적 경합범의 성립을 차단하는 효력이 없다고 보아야 하므로 그 확정판결 전후의 범죄행위는 실체적 경합범으로 보아야 한다는 점(2011도2351에 대한 반론), 법문에 동일 용어가 사용되더라도 항상 동일한 의미로 파악할 필요는 없다는 점(2017도14609 전합에 대한 반론) 등에서 판례를 비판적으로 검토하여 보았다.

다양한 연속밀도 함수를 갖는 HMM에 대한 우리말 음성인식에 관한 연구

우인성,신좌철,강흥순,김석동,Woo, In-Sung,Shin, Chwa-Cheul,Kang, Heung-Soon,Kim, Suk-Dong 한국전기전자학회 2007 전기전자학회논문지 Vol.11 No.2

This paper is a study on continuous speech recognition in the Korean language using HMM-based models with continuous density functions. Here, we propose the most efficient method of continuous speech recognition for the Korean language under the condition of a continuous HMM model with 2 to 44 density functions. Two voice models were used CI-Model that uses 36 uni-phones and CD-Model that uses 3,000 tri-phones. Language model was based on N-gram. Using these models, 500 sentences and 6,486 words under speaker-independent condition were processed. In the case of the CI-Model, the maximum word recognition rate was 94.4% and sentence recognition rate was 64.6%. For the CD-Model, word recognition rate was 98.2% and sentence recognition rate was 73.6%. The recognition rate of CD-Model we obtained was stable.

화공안전분야 : 다단전해조를 이용한 도금폐수처리

우인성 한국안전학회(구-한국산업안전학회) 1996 `96 추계학술연구발표회 Vol.- No.-

‘성인지 감수성’에 관해 판시한 대법원의 성범죄 형사판결에 관한 소고 ― 대법원 2018. 10. 25. 선고 2018도7709 판결 ―

우인성 한국형사판례연구회 2021 刑事判例硏究 Vol.29 No.-

This article dealt with problems or hazards arising from the usage of the concept ‘Gender Sensitivity’ to the criminal case’s fact-finding and reasoning. First, if Supreme Court uses that concept in order to overturn the trial-court’s fact-finding under the name of violating the principle of free evaluation of evidence, it can infringe on the principle of the court-oriented trial system, which means the fact-finding should be done in the trial-court which conducts the discovery and examines the evidence, which Supreme Court can’t do generally. Second, the question arises whether there, in the case concerned, was a battery or threat which could constitute that of the rape. Third, the concept ‘Gender Sensitivity’ Supreme Court uses could be contradicted with the concept of ‘presumption of innocence’, further with that of ‘in dubio pro reo’, if it is used to induce the guilt of the defendant. Fourth, the concept ‘Gender Sensitivity’ is not obvious, which means it is too ambiguous to apply appropriately to the assessment of the weight of the evidence in the litigations. Fifth, the concept Supreme Court uses seems to ignore that the gender is divided not into the polarized binary but into the spectrum, because it seems that Supreme Court, despite of using the word ‘Gender’, rather focuses on and pays attention to the biological sex. Sixth, the decision neglects the issue of mistake-of-fact, which stems from the imperfection of the human beings. Seventh, the possibility of the motive to tell a lie about the reason of the intercourse seems not to be considered in the Supreme Court’s decision. Eighth, this decision can be misunderstood to underestimate the autonomy of the female on their ability in decision-makings, in other words, self-determinations. Ninth, the tendency to find the facts based on the statements of one party can drive the other party to have the motive to produce the inculpatory evidence, which is collected by the abnormal means like recording the sounds before, during, and after the intercourse. Tenth, the trial-courts can be obsessed with the implicit pressure that the evidentiary value of the victim’s statements should be assessed to outweigh that of the defendant. Eleventh, the possibility for the victim to be compensated for the injury in the civil case, even though the defendant is not punished in the criminal case, can be overlooked.

高速버스의 經濟壽命에 관한 硏究 : 代替理論과 財源調達 方案을 中心으로

禹仁性 연세대학교 경영대학원 1977 經營論叢 Vol.11 No.1