RISS 학술연구정보서비스

검색
다국어 입력

http://chineseinput.net/에서 pinyin(병음)방식으로 중국어를 변환할 수 있습니다.

변환된 중국어를 복사하여 사용하시면 됩니다.

예시)
  • 中文 을 입력하시려면 zhongwen을 입력하시고 space를누르시면됩니다.
  • 北京 을 입력하시려면 beijing을 입력하시고 space를 누르시면 됩니다.
닫기
    인기검색어 순위 펼치기

    RISS 인기검색어

      검색결과 좁혀 보기

      선택해제
      • 좁혀본 항목 보기순서

        • 원문유무
        • 원문제공처
        • 등재정보
        • 학술지명
          펼치기
        • 주제분류
        • 발행연도
          펼치기
        • 작성언어
        • 저자
          펼치기

      오늘 본 자료

      • 오늘 본 자료가 없습니다.
      더보기
      • 무료
      • 기관 내 무료
      • 유료
      • KCI등재

        시공여건을 반영한 TBM선정 방법에 대한 연구

        오준근,사공명,Oh, Joon-Geun,Sagong, Myung 한국터널지하공간학회 2014 한국터널지하공간학회논문집 Vol.16 No.2

        본 연구에서는 지반 및 현장조건을 고려한 TBM 선정방법을 제시하였다. 지반, 환경, 가격조건별로 TBM 선정에 영향을 미치는 인자와 굴착장비를 선정 분류 하였다. 선정된 영향인자와 장비 간 가중치를 AHP기법을 적용하여 산정하였다. 선정된 영향인자의 분석결과 기본요소에서는 지반조건이 가장 중요한 영향요소로 확인되었으며, 세부요소로서 암반조건에서는 강도, 토사지반조건에서는 수압이 가장 중요한 인자로 확인되었다. 주변 환경조건에서는 시공성에 영향을 줄 수 있는 주변구조물 인접여부가 중요한 인자로 확인되었다. 마지막으로 도출된 각 영향인자별 가중치를 토대로 굴착현장에 적용 가능한 TBM을 선정하고 도출결과와 실제 현장에 적용된 장비의 비교를 통하여 본 연구에서 제안하는 방법에 대한 검증이 이루어 졌다. In this study, TBM selection methods to meet soil and site conditions were presented. Factors and excavation equipment affecting TBM selection by soil and environmental condition were selected and classified. Weights between equipment and influencing factors selected were calculated by applying the AHP (Analytic Hierarchy Process) method. The results of the analysis influence factors, Ground condition was a major factor in objective factors and strength was a major factor in the hard condition of criteria factors and water pressure was a major factor in the soft ground condition of criteria factors. In Environment condition, existence of adjacent structures was evaluated more important than existence of feasible site. Lastly, Adequacy was verified through the deduction of results that coincide with input equipment by applying derived weights to actual site conditions.

      • KCI등재

        대덕연구단지관련 법제의 정비방안에 관한 공법적 고찰

        오준근(Oh Jun-Gen) 한국토지공법학회 2004 土地公法硏究 Vol.22 No.-

        The purpose of this article is to present the direction of legislative reform necessary for developing the Korean Daedeok Science Town into a key Northeast Asian cluster. The Daedeok Science Town, which is located in Yuseong-gu, Daejeon Metropolitan City, the Republic of Korea, is expected to be developed into a model town standing comparison with foreign successful clusters. The reason is that the Daedeok Science Town has grown to play a key role of creating and popularizing science and technology knowledge, including core source technology, as well as training science and technology manpower through educational institutions installed in the Town, has contributed to the supplement and reinforcement of the core capability for industrial renovation, and has served to build science and technology infrastructures in Korea by furnishing abundant science and technology information databases. On the other hand, the Daedeok Science Town has its problems and limits. For example, it has no efficient means to put the accomplishments of research to commercial use and to activate a joint network between industrial circles, academia, and research institutes, has no foreign enterprises and foreign R&D centers, and lacks an effective system to provide necessary support to enterprises and a leading group to systematically push up with the cluster strategies. Such problems on the Daedeok Science Town leads directly to the defects in the legal system governing the Daedeok Science Town. The Daedeok Science Town Management Act is enacted and now in force. This Act, however, has its limit in that it just governs the Daedeok Science Town developed into industrial complex in view of the management of its site. In detail, it does not have the essential part of a law governing a special development zone for regional innovation, the legal basis for a management body to lead the innovation of the Daedeok Science Town, and the legal means to actualize dynamic factors specific to the Daedeok Science Town. To resolve the aforesaid problems, it is needed to enact a special Act to be substituted for the existing Daedeok Science Town Management Act. Such a new law must provide the legal basis for the main group to lead the development of the Daedeok Science Town as an innovation cluster, adopt the merits of a legal system related to a special development zone for regional innovation, and satisfy the requisites for a special law related to the development of science and technology beyond support provided under the Framework Act on Science and Technology and other related laws. It is expected that the enactment of new law, the establishment of necessary organizations and funds, and the building of a support system for the special development zone will enable the Daedeok Science Town to be developed into a core cluster in the Northeast Asia by making it possible to conduct efficient research and development and put the results to practical use.

      • KCI등재
      • KCI등재후보
      • KCI등재
      • 감차합의서의 불이행을 이유로 한 직권감차통보처분의 법적 성질 - 대법원 2016. 11. 24. 선고 2016두45028 판결 -

        오준근 ( Oh Jungen ) 법조협회 2017 최신판례분석 Vol.66 No.2

        이 판결은 현대 민주국가 행정의 새로운 현상 중의 하나인 “권력적·일방적 행정 작용을 비권력적·합의적 행정작용으로 전환”하는 과정에서 발생하는 법적 문제점을 단적으로 드러내는 사례에 해당한다고 할 수 있다. 택시의 수가 급증한 반면 인구가 감소하여 택시운송업 전체가 위기에 처해있다고 판단한 지방자치단체의 장이 택시운송사업자들과 만나서 택시의 수를 줄여서 상생의 구도를 형성하기로 합의하였으나 일부 사업자가 합의를 이행하지 아니하여 지방자치단체의 장이 직권으로 감차처분을 한 것은 행정청이 택시운송사업자를 동반자로 보고, 서로 교섭을 통하여 경쟁을 완화하고자 노력한 것이라 볼 수 있기 때문이다. 이와 같은 감차합의와 합의의 불이행에 따른 직권감차처분을 놓고 원심판결과 대법원판결은 서로 전혀 상반된 입장을 드러내고 있다. 원심과 대법원이 서로 다른 의견을 내는 데는 그럴만한 이유가 있다. 대한민국의 「행정절차법」에는 독일과는 달리 공법상 계약에 관한 일반적 근거 규정이 마련되어 있지 아니하다. 이러한 문제점 때문에 사법상 계약과 구분되는 공법상 계약을 인정할 것인가, 공권력적인 처분을 공법상 계약으로 대체할 수 있는가 여부 등에 관하여 법이론이 정립되어 있지 않다. 특히 공법상 당사자소송이 활성화되어 있지 아니하여 이 사례와 같이 행정처분과 공법상 계약의 경계선에 위치하고 있는 사건을 효율적으로 다툴 행정소송제도도 확립되어 있지 않다. 이와 같은 상황을 고려하고 이들 쟁점을 다룰 수밖에 없다는 점이 이 사건에 대한 법원의 판결을 엇갈리게 만들고 있다. 감차합의서가 Y시장과 택시사업자 상호간에 체결된 합의임은 분명하다. 그러나 이를 대등당사자간의 계약이라 판단하는 것은 의문이다. 대법원이 다각적으로 분석한 바와 같이 택시사업은 「여객자동차운수사업법」에 근거한 면허사업이고 택시사업면허는 수익적 행정행위에 해당한다. 행정청은 법률에 근거한 다양한 규제수단을 보유하고 있어서 현행 법률의 구조상 행정청과 택시사업자는 결코 대등한 당사자가 될 수 없기 때문이다. 자유민주적 법치국가원리를 국가의 기본질서로 택하고 있는 대한민국의 법현실상 행정청과 국민간의 권리의무관계를 형성하고자 할 경우 법률 유보의 원칙 및 법률우위의 원칙이 적용되어야 한다. 이 점은 계약의 형태로 이루어지는 행정의 경우에 있어서도 예외일 수 없다. 독일「연방행정절차법」과 같이 공법상 계약에 관한 일반 규정을 「행정절차법」에 도입하고, 이에 관한 쟁송수단을 「행정소송법」에 구체화하는 입법작업이 이루어진 경우에 한하여 행정청과 국민간에 행정행위를 대체하는 계약의 체결 및 이를 둘러싼 분쟁의 해결이 원활하게 이루어질 수 있을 것이라 생각한다. 이와 같은 점에서 감차합의서를 공법상 계약으로 보아 행정소송을 통한 분쟁해결 가능성을 부인할 것이 아니라 이를 “부관부 행정행위”를 함에 있어 부가한 “협약형식의 부관”으로 파악하고, 현행 「여객자동차운수사업법」의 규정을 준수하였는가, 부관의 위법성은 없는가를 구체적으로 분석하도록 한대법원의 파기환송 판결은 비록 아쉽지만 부득이한 것이었다고 생각된다. This case represents the legal problems of the resent Korean administrative practices which occurs in the course of the changing the authoritative one side administrative act to the consultative contractive one. The Mayor of Iksan County summoned the local passenger transport business chief executive officers and agreed with them about the reducing the number of the taxis in order to better the situation of the taxi business in their county. But a part of the taxi CEOs did not put into practice the planned reducing the number of their taxis and the Mayor ordered them to keep the agreement. The Agency regarded the local CEOs as the partners of the local administration and met and agreed with them about the plan of the strengthening the business situation. The Korean Supreme Court and the High Court showed quiet different viewpoint about the administrative order of the reducing the number of motor vehicles ; the Korean Supreme Court judges decided that this order was one of the administrative disposition with the additional clause in the form of an agreement, but the High Court judges saw that order as an enforcement of an agreement clause. This paper found the reason of the inconsistency of the judicial decisions in the problems of the current Korean legislative situation: There is no general regulation of the administrative contract in the Korean Administrative Procedures Act and the legal theory about this phenomena is not arranged. The process of the law suit about the dispute concerning the administrative contract is not activated in the Korean Administrative Litigation Act. The agreement of the reducing the number of the motor vehicles between the Iksan Mayer and the local business CEOs could not be regarded as a contract between the equal business partners. The passenger transport business is under the regulation of the Passenger Transport Service Act. Any person who intends to engage in passenger transport business shall prepare a business plan and obtain a license from the local agency. Therefore the agency and the license holder cannot be a equal partner of a agreement about the numbers of their motor vehicles. The decision of the Korean Supreme Court, which regarded the motor vehicle reducing order as a administrative disposition with the additional clause in the form of an agreement, was to be accepted as a unescapable judgement.

      • KCI등재

        국민권익위원회 개편 방안에 관한 입법정책적 고찰

        오준근(Oh, Jun-Gen) 경희법학연구소 2017 경희법학 Vol.52 No.1

        This Study aimed to analyze the legislative policy on the reorganization of the Korean Anti-Corruption and Civil Rights Commission(ACRC). The ACRC was launched on February 2008 by the integration of the Ombudsman of Korea, the Korea Independent Commission against Corruption and the Administrative Appeals Commission. With the consolidation of these three organizations, planned to provide with one-stop service of addressing public complaints, filing administrative appeals and fighting corruption by a single organization in a speedier and more convenient manner. But after the 10 years of the operation of this organization, the consolidation of these functions in ACRC did not create the effect of multiplication but became on obstacle of the effective functioning of these three organizations as their own characters. This study suggested the legislation of the separation of the ACRC into following two independent organizations : Anti-Corruption Commission and Administrative Appeals Tribunals. First, The Republic of Korea need a legislation of an independent organization against the corruption. This legislation should vest the Anti-Corruption Commission (ACC) a comprehensive power to establish and operate the anti-corruption policy and to investigate the corrupt public servant. Second, The Korean Administrative Appeals Tribunal(AAT) should become an independent organization. There are more than 27 organizations for the management of the administrative appeals cases. These organizations should be integrated to the comprehensive AAT. 이 논문은 2017년 대통령 선거에 따라 새로운 정부가 출범하여 정부조직개편 입법을 하고자 할 경우 국민권익위원회의 바람직한 개편방향을 제시하고자 기획되었다. “국민권익위원회”는 이명박 정부의 정부조직 개편과정에서 “국민고충처리위원회”, “국무총리행정심판위원회” 및 “국가청렴위원회” 세 기관이 통합되어 2008년 2월 29일 새롭게 출범한 기관이다. 입법내용 및 운용현실을 검토한 결과 고충민원, 행정심판과 부패방지를 한 기관에서 수행하도록 한 국민권익위원회의 행정조직은 통합으로 인한 상승효과를 발휘하기 보다는 각각의기능에장애요소로작용하기때문에국민권익위원회는“부패방지위원회”와“행정심판원”이라는 두 독립한 기구로 분리 개편되어야 한다. 첫째, 부패방지는 “부패방지위원회”와 같이 이 기능만을 전담하는 전문적 독립기구에서수행하도록 개편되어야 한다. 정치적으로 중립적인 위원의 복합체인 합의제 행정기구를 법률에 의하여 설치하고 이 기구에 강력한 독립성을 부여하는 것이 바람직하다. 공직자의 부패문제를 근원적으로 해결하려면 부패의 예방과 부패문화의 청산을 위한 정책의 수립 및집행, 공직자와유관단체 및 국민에대한 교육 및홍보, 비리를 저지른공직자에 대한 수사권의 부여 등 부패의 청산과 관련한 제반 권한이 전담기관에 빠짐없이 부여될 수 있어야한다. 둘째, 행정심판은독립한준사법기구로서의“행정심판원”을설치하고 이기구에서전담하도록 개편되어야 한다. 이 경우 소청심사위원회, 조세심판원, 중앙토지수용위원회 등 27개이상에달하는전형적인특별행정심판위원회를최대한행정심판원으로통합 이관하여야한다. 고충민원은 대안적분쟁해결기능에속하지만, 현재권고이상을 할수없게 제도화되어있고, 행정심판을 제기한 경우 반드시 각하하도록 하여 제도적으로 분리된 상태이다. 고충민원과행정심판의실질적인통합이이룩되어야한다. 이논문은그조화적통합을위한대안을 제시하였다. 국민권익위원회를 “부패방지위원회”와 “행정심판원”으로 분리하고 각각의 기관에 전문성과 독립성을 부여할 경우 부패방지와 행정심판은 보다 합목적적으로 수행될 수 있을 것이다. 기관의수가 증가하는 것처럼보일 수 있지만, 여러 기관에 분산되어있는 부패방지 행정조직과 수십개에 달하는 행정심판조직을 통합할 경우 30개가 넘는 행정조직을 두 개의통합된 기관으로 이관하는 것이어서 그 통합의 효과를 극대화할 수 있을 것이라 생각한다. 정부조직의 개편을논의하는입법과정에서국민권익위원회의 개편이보다합리적이며바람직한 방향으로 이루어질 수 있기를 기대한다.

      • KCI등재

        부동산 개발사업 허가의 부관과 개발협약에 관한 한국과 미국의 비교법적 고찰

        오준근(Oh Jun-Gen) 한국토지공법학회 2008 土地公法硏究 Vol.40 No.-

        Land Development requires a variety of public facilities - roads, water, parks, schools - to support it. States and local governments expanded developer funded public facility provisions by means of required exactions, dedications and fees and land development conditions. The major legal issue with respect with these conditions is the connection to the land development. The cases and laws of the Republic of Korea and the United States about these land development conditions were compared in this article. It dealt with the cases of the Korean Supreme Court - the Reconstruction of old Apartment Housing Complex in Seoul and the Development of New Collective Housing Area in Yongin and the cases of the United States Supreme Court - Nollan v. California Coastal Commission and Dolan v. City of Tigard. The Results of the analysis were summarized as follows. First, the government agencies of the Republic of Korea and the United States imposed various conditions accompanied by land development permissions. Second, the standards of the legitimacy of these conditions were developed through the decisions of the courts. The Korean Supreme Court used ""Proper Connection Doctrine."" The necessity and usefulness of the conditions and mutual consent beforehand were the major contents of this doctrine. According to the decisions of the Supreme Court of the United States land development conditions must seek to promote a legitimate state interest, had to be related to the land development project and must be proportional to the needs or problems which the land development projects were expected to cause. Because both developers and agencies face difficult problems in the land development approval process, the system of ""Development Agreement"" has been used in the United States. Some specific statutory authorization were established to make clear that the agreements effectuate a public purpose recognized by the state. There had been no legal foundation for the introducing of this system in Korea. But the Korean agencies made actual consent with the developers about the conditions before they gave approvals of the land development projects. The Korean Supreme Court made the confirmity between the contents of the consents and land development conditions as major standard of decision of the legitimacy. This article indicated these problems and discussed the possibility of the introducing the development agreement system.

      • KCI등재

        영국법상 사회기반시설에 대한 민간투자사업과 공공계약규정의 관계에 관한 연구

        오준근(Jun, Gen Oh) 한국토지공법학회 2008 土地公法硏究 Vol.42 No.-

        This article aims a scientific analysis about the relationship between the Public-Private-Partnership and the Public Contract Regulations in the United Kingdom. First, the meaning, the legal foundation and the model of Public-Private- Partnership (PPP) in Great Britain were put in order. Second, the structure and main contents of the Public Contract Regulations(PCR) were adjusted. The relationship between the PPP and the PCR in the United Kingdom was analysed on this basis. Followings are the results of this analysis. The PPP is widely used in the United Kingdom, but there is no special regulation only for the PPP. The PCR specify the procedures to be followed in relation to the award of public works contract, public supply contracts and public services contract. The contracting authorities are listed in regulation 3 of the PCR. The contracting authorities for the PPP contracts have to be one of the authorities in regulation 3 of the PCR. The PCR apply whenever a contracting authority seeks offers in relation to proposed public works contract, public supply contracts, public services contract, framework agreement or dynamic purchasing system according to the regulation 5 of the PCR. But the PPP contracts are such a complex situation as to choose one of the contract type regulated in the PCR. For the purpose of seeking offers in relation to a proposed public contracts, a contracting authority shall use the open procedure or the restricted procedure in all circumstances, except where it may use the negotiated procedure or the competitive dialogue procedure. This principle of contracting procedures have to be applied in PPP contracts. A checklist about how to select a contract award procedure in PPP contracts was formed in this article.

      • KCI등재

        서울시 뉴타운 개발의 법적 문제점

        오준근(Jun-Gen Oh) 한국토지공법학회 2006 土地公法硏究 Vol.30 No.-

          The "Special Act on Promotion of Urban Area Readjustment" is passed by the National Assembly in December 2005 and promulgated in January 2006. This Act is expected to help provide special legal supports for the development of new towns. However, it remains at issue whether such legislation is proper in the light of the whole system of public law governing the development and utilization of national land. In such context, this study handles the following.   First, it includes legal analysis on whether such legislation undermines ① the principles of integrated legal application due to enactment of the Special Act, ② the Seoul Metropolitan Area Readjustment Planning Act, or ③ the ranking structure of laws, although it is required to perform new town projects,   Secondly, it contains reviews on the provisions governing the new town projects including issues as to ① whether the new town projects are compatible with the national land and urban planning system in the designation of readjustment promotion zones, ② whether decisions on readjustment promotion plans can be made in a systematized and unified way, ③ problems in legal logic such as the establishment of unreasonable exceptions to assessment of impacts on environment, traffic, disasters, etc., and ④ problems in legal policies such as incomplete integration of readjustment promotion projects.   Lastly, it includes reviews on operators of the new town projects, including issues regarding ① the unbalance of persons in charge of the establishment of the plans concerned, ② the excess undertakers of the readjustment promotion projects, ③ the weakness of institutional foundations for project operators related to the expansion of infrastructures, and ④ the unreasonableness of the provisions governing the supervisors of project operators.   Some critics may say that this paper is focused on research into the demerits of both the new town projects and the Special Act on Promotion of Urban Area Readjustment applicable to such projects, rather than their merits. However, I think such research is indispensable taking into consideration the functions of jurisprudence as a science. The stressing of positive points may be necessary for public relations, but discussion and the raising of problems are essential in the area of scientific research. I expect that this study will help perform new town projects in a more reasonable way by encouraging further study on such development projects.

      연관 검색어 추천

      이 검색어로 많이 본 자료

      활용도 높은 자료

      해외이동버튼